Pure intervention effect or effect in routine health care - blinded or non-blinded randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background Randomized trials provide the most valid evidence of effectiveness of interventions. The study aims to determine the primary study question for randomized controlled trials; to evaluate the study questions in trials on effectiveness of arthroscopic meniscectomy for meniscal ruptu...
Main Author: | Antti Malmivaara |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-08-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-018-0549-z |
Similar Items
-
Statistical analysis plan for the 5-year and 10-year follow-up assessments of the FIDELITY trial
by: Raine Sihvonen, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Participation of patients during arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is conducive to postoperative rehabilitation and satisfaction: a single-center retrospective study
by: Pengfei Ruan, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL MENISCECTOMY FOR CHRONIC MENISCAL TEARS
by: Asad Ullah Burki, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Specific-class Skin Side-effects of Drugs Might Compromise Blinding in Randomized Controlled Trials
by: Giao Do-Pham, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Knee septic arthritis caused by α-hemolytic Streptococcus in a patient with a recent history of knee arthroscopy: a case report
by: Giovanni Balato, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)