A randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate a novel noninjectable anesthetic gel with thermosetting agent during scaling and root planing in chronic periodontitis patients

Aim: To study the efficacy of a noninjectable anesthetic gel with a thermosetting agent in the reduction of pain during scaling and root planing (SRP) in untreated chronic periodontitis patients. Materials and Methods: This study is a randomized, double-masked, split-mouth, placebo-controlled trial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M M Dayakar, S M Akbar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2016;volume=10;issue=2;spage=192;epage=197;aulast=Dayakar
_version_ 1811337963837063168
author M M Dayakar
S M Akbar
author_facet M M Dayakar
S M Akbar
author_sort M M Dayakar
collection DOAJ
description Aim: To study the efficacy of a noninjectable anesthetic gel with a thermosetting agent in the reduction of pain during scaling and root planing (SRP) in untreated chronic periodontitis patients. Materials and Methods: This study is a randomized, double-masked, split-mouth, placebo-controlled trial. Thirty patients were enrolled who underwent SRP in a split-mouth (right side/left side) manner. Before commencement of SRP, both quadrants on each side were isolated and had a randomized gel (either placebo or test gel) placed in the periodontal pockets for 30 s. The pain was measured using numerical rating scale (NRS) and verbal rating scale (VRS). Results: The median NRS pain score for the patients treated with the anesthetic test gel was 1 (range: 0-4) as opposed to 5 (range: 3-7) in the placebo treated patients. The mean rank of pain score using NRS in test gel was 16.18 as compared to 44.82 in placebo treated sites. Hence, significant reduction in pain was found in test gel as compared to placebo using NRS (P < 0.001). The VRS showed that the majority of patients reported no pain or mild pain with a median of 1 as compared to placebo treated sites with a median of 2 suggestive of moderate pain. Conclusions: The NRS and VRS pain scores showed that the side treated with anesthetic gel was statistically more effective than the placebo in reducing pain during SRP.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T18:02:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7aeb74c4bd8149e28f9c3f39793fb451
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1658-354X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T18:02:40Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj.art-7aeb74c4bd8149e28f9c3f39793fb4512022-12-22T02:36:11ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Journal of Anaesthesia1658-354X2016-01-0110219219710.4103/1658-354X.168823A randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate a novel noninjectable anesthetic gel with thermosetting agent during scaling and root planing in chronic periodontitis patientsM M DayakarS M AkbarAim: To study the efficacy of a noninjectable anesthetic gel with a thermosetting agent in the reduction of pain during scaling and root planing (SRP) in untreated chronic periodontitis patients. Materials and Methods: This study is a randomized, double-masked, split-mouth, placebo-controlled trial. Thirty patients were enrolled who underwent SRP in a split-mouth (right side/left side) manner. Before commencement of SRP, both quadrants on each side were isolated and had a randomized gel (either placebo or test gel) placed in the periodontal pockets for 30 s. The pain was measured using numerical rating scale (NRS) and verbal rating scale (VRS). Results: The median NRS pain score for the patients treated with the anesthetic test gel was 1 (range: 0-4) as opposed to 5 (range: 3-7) in the placebo treated patients. The mean rank of pain score using NRS in test gel was 16.18 as compared to 44.82 in placebo treated sites. Hence, significant reduction in pain was found in test gel as compared to placebo using NRS (P < 0.001). The VRS showed that the majority of patients reported no pain or mild pain with a median of 1 as compared to placebo treated sites with a median of 2 suggestive of moderate pain. Conclusions: The NRS and VRS pain scores showed that the side treated with anesthetic gel was statistically more effective than the placebo in reducing pain during SRP.http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2016;volume=10;issue=2;spage=192;epage=197;aulast=DayakarAnesthesiaintra-pocketpainscaling root planing
spellingShingle M M Dayakar
S M Akbar
A randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate a novel noninjectable anesthetic gel with thermosetting agent during scaling and root planing in chronic periodontitis patients
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Anesthesia
intra-pocket
pain
scaling root planing
title A randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate a novel noninjectable anesthetic gel with thermosetting agent during scaling and root planing in chronic periodontitis patients
title_full A randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate a novel noninjectable anesthetic gel with thermosetting agent during scaling and root planing in chronic periodontitis patients
title_fullStr A randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate a novel noninjectable anesthetic gel with thermosetting agent during scaling and root planing in chronic periodontitis patients
title_full_unstemmed A randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate a novel noninjectable anesthetic gel with thermosetting agent during scaling and root planing in chronic periodontitis patients
title_short A randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate a novel noninjectable anesthetic gel with thermosetting agent during scaling and root planing in chronic periodontitis patients
title_sort randomized placebo controlled trial to evaluate a novel noninjectable anesthetic gel with thermosetting agent during scaling and root planing in chronic periodontitis patients
topic Anesthesia
intra-pocket
pain
scaling root planing
url http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2016;volume=10;issue=2;spage=192;epage=197;aulast=Dayakar
work_keys_str_mv AT mmdayakar arandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialtoevaluateanovelnoninjectableanestheticgelwiththermosettingagentduringscalingandrootplaninginchronicperiodontitispatients
AT smakbar arandomizedplacebocontrolledtrialtoevaluateanovelnoninjectableanestheticgelwiththermosettingagentduringscalingandrootplaninginchronicperiodontitispatients
AT mmdayakar randomizedplacebocontrolledtrialtoevaluateanovelnoninjectableanestheticgelwiththermosettingagentduringscalingandrootplaninginchronicperiodontitispatients
AT smakbar randomizedplacebocontrolledtrialtoevaluateanovelnoninjectableanestheticgelwiththermosettingagentduringscalingandrootplaninginchronicperiodontitispatients