A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation
In this paper, I spell out and argue for a new epistemic theory of argumentation. Contrary to extant views, this theory is compatible with a pluralistic framework on argumentation, where the norms governing argumentation depend on the aim with which we engage in the practice. A domain of specificall...
Main Author: | Job de Grefte |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/7020 |
Similar Items
-
Developing argumentation in history texts: epistemic modality and evidentiality
by: Francisco Alonso Almeida, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01) -
In Defense of the Objective Epistemic Approach to Argumentation
by: John Biro, et al.
Published: (2008-02-01) -
Determinism and Judgment. A Critique of the Indirect Epistemic Transcendental Argument for Freedom
by: Luca Zanetti
Published: (2019-12-01) -
An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation
by: Alvin I. Goldman
Published: (2004-01-01) -
Impacts of a Digital Dialogue Game and Epistemic Beliefs on Argumentative Discourse and Willingness to Argue
by: Omid Noroozi, et al.
Published: (2016-05-01)