Influence of human and bovine substrate on the microleakage of two adhesive systems

The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the marginal sealing of two adhesive systems and to analyze the influence of human and bovine substrates on marginal microleakage in enamel. Rectangular-shaped class V cavities (4 mm wide x 2 mm high x 2 mm deep) were made as follows: 8 cavities were pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karoline Guará Brusaca Almeida, Kristine Guará Brusaca Almeida Scheibe, Ana Emília Figuerêdo Oliveira, Cláudia Maria Coêlho Alves, José Ferreira Costa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of São Paulo 2009-04-01
Series:Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000200004
_version_ 1818602626422407168
author Karoline Guará Brusaca Almeida
Kristine Guará Brusaca Almeida Scheibe
Ana Emília Figuerêdo Oliveira
Cláudia Maria Coêlho Alves
José Ferreira Costa
author_facet Karoline Guará Brusaca Almeida
Kristine Guará Brusaca Almeida Scheibe
Ana Emília Figuerêdo Oliveira
Cláudia Maria Coêlho Alves
José Ferreira Costa
author_sort Karoline Guará Brusaca Almeida
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the marginal sealing of two adhesive systems and to analyze the influence of human and bovine substrates on marginal microleakage in enamel. Rectangular-shaped class V cavities (4 mm wide x 2 mm high x 2 mm deep) were made as follows: 8 cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of the human teeth with margins located on enamel and 16 cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of the bovine teeth. The cavities were randomly assigned to 4 groups of 8 cavities according to the adhesive system and substrate: G1 - Prime & Bond 2.1 (Dentsply)/human substrate; G2 - Adhese (Ivoclar/Vivadent)/human substrate; G3 - Prime & Bond 2.1 (Dentsply)/bovine substrate; G4 - Adhese (Ivoclar/Vivadent)/bovine substrate. The cavities were filled with microhybrid composite resin (Fillmagic) and after polishing/finishing procedures, the teeth were subjected to a thermocycling regimen of 500 cycles with 1-min immersions in water at 55° ±2°C and 5° ± 2°C. Next, the teeth were coated with two layers of nail polish to within 1 mm of the margin, submerged in a 50% silver nitrate solution for 2 h, rinsed thoroughly in running tap and immersed in developing solution for 8 h. The restorations were bisected resulting in 16 specimens. Microleakage was observed under a stereomicroscope at x25 and recorded using four-point (0-3) scoring system. The data were analyzed statistically by the Mann Whitney U-test at 5% significance level. Leakage was present in all specimens and there was statistically significant difference between the adhesive systems. Adhese self-etching system showed significantly more leakage in both substrates (human - p= 0.0001 and bovine - p= 0.0031). There was no statistically significant difference between human and bovine substrates for either of the adhesive systems based on different bonding mechanisms (Prime & Bond 2.1 - p= 0.6923 and Adhese - p= 0.6109). Neither of the adhesive systems was capable to completely prevent microleakage and the self-etching system was more susceptible to microleakage.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T13:10:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7b00a2211f924342affa1195fabb0299
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-7757
1678-7765
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T13:10:16Z
publishDate 2009-04-01
publisher University of São Paulo
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Oral Science
spelling doaj.art-7b00a2211f924342affa1195fabb02992022-12-21T22:30:38ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-77571678-77652009-04-01172929610.1590/S1678-77572009000200004Influence of human and bovine substrate on the microleakage of two adhesive systemsKaroline Guará Brusaca AlmeidaKristine Guará Brusaca Almeida ScheibeAna Emília Figuerêdo OliveiraCláudia Maria Coêlho AlvesJosé Ferreira CostaThe aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the marginal sealing of two adhesive systems and to analyze the influence of human and bovine substrates on marginal microleakage in enamel. Rectangular-shaped class V cavities (4 mm wide x 2 mm high x 2 mm deep) were made as follows: 8 cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of the human teeth with margins located on enamel and 16 cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of the bovine teeth. The cavities were randomly assigned to 4 groups of 8 cavities according to the adhesive system and substrate: G1 - Prime & Bond 2.1 (Dentsply)/human substrate; G2 - Adhese (Ivoclar/Vivadent)/human substrate; G3 - Prime & Bond 2.1 (Dentsply)/bovine substrate; G4 - Adhese (Ivoclar/Vivadent)/bovine substrate. The cavities were filled with microhybrid composite resin (Fillmagic) and after polishing/finishing procedures, the teeth were subjected to a thermocycling regimen of 500 cycles with 1-min immersions in water at 55° ±2°C and 5° ± 2°C. Next, the teeth were coated with two layers of nail polish to within 1 mm of the margin, submerged in a 50% silver nitrate solution for 2 h, rinsed thoroughly in running tap and immersed in developing solution for 8 h. The restorations were bisected resulting in 16 specimens. Microleakage was observed under a stereomicroscope at x25 and recorded using four-point (0-3) scoring system. The data were analyzed statistically by the Mann Whitney U-test at 5% significance level. Leakage was present in all specimens and there was statistically significant difference between the adhesive systems. Adhese self-etching system showed significantly more leakage in both substrates (human - p= 0.0001 and bovine - p= 0.0031). There was no statistically significant difference between human and bovine substrates for either of the adhesive systems based on different bonding mechanisms (Prime & Bond 2.1 - p= 0.6923 and Adhese - p= 0.6109). Neither of the adhesive systems was capable to completely prevent microleakage and the self-etching system was more susceptible to microleakage.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000200004ToothMicroleakageBovine and human teethSelf-etching adhesives
spellingShingle Karoline Guará Brusaca Almeida
Kristine Guará Brusaca Almeida Scheibe
Ana Emília Figuerêdo Oliveira
Cláudia Maria Coêlho Alves
José Ferreira Costa
Influence of human and bovine substrate on the microleakage of two adhesive systems
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Tooth
Microleakage
Bovine and human teeth
Self-etching adhesives
title Influence of human and bovine substrate on the microleakage of two adhesive systems
title_full Influence of human and bovine substrate on the microleakage of two adhesive systems
title_fullStr Influence of human and bovine substrate on the microleakage of two adhesive systems
title_full_unstemmed Influence of human and bovine substrate on the microleakage of two adhesive systems
title_short Influence of human and bovine substrate on the microleakage of two adhesive systems
title_sort influence of human and bovine substrate on the microleakage of two adhesive systems
topic Tooth
Microleakage
Bovine and human teeth
Self-etching adhesives
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000200004
work_keys_str_mv AT karolineguarabrusacaalmeida influenceofhumanandbovinesubstrateonthemicroleakageoftwoadhesivesystems
AT kristineguarabrusacaalmeidascheibe influenceofhumanandbovinesubstrateonthemicroleakageoftwoadhesivesystems
AT anaemiliafigueredooliveira influenceofhumanandbovinesubstrateonthemicroleakageoftwoadhesivesystems
AT claudiamariacoelhoalves influenceofhumanandbovinesubstrateonthemicroleakageoftwoadhesivesystems
AT joseferreiracosta influenceofhumanandbovinesubstrateonthemicroleakageoftwoadhesivesystems