A comparative content analysis of newspaper coverage about extreme risk protection order policies in passing and non-passing US states
Abstract Background Extreme risk protection order (ERPO) laws are a tool for firearm violence prevention (in effect in 19 states), often enacted in the wake of a public mass shooting when media coverage of gun violence tends to spike. We compared news media framing of ERPOs in states that passed and...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2022-05-01
|
| Series: | BMC Public Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13374-8 |
| _version_ | 1811250861806977024 |
|---|---|
| author | Amanda J. Aubel Rocco Pallin Christopher E. Knoepke Garen J. Wintemute Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz |
| author_facet | Amanda J. Aubel Rocco Pallin Christopher E. Knoepke Garen J. Wintemute Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz |
| author_sort | Amanda J. Aubel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Extreme risk protection order (ERPO) laws are a tool for firearm violence prevention (in effect in 19 states), often enacted in the wake of a public mass shooting when media coverage of gun violence tends to spike. We compared news media framing of ERPOs in states that passed and those that considered but did not pass such laws after the 2018 mass shooting in Parkland, Florida. Methods We conducted a content analysis of 244 newspaper articles about ERPOs, published in 2018, in three passing (FL, VT, RI) and three non-passing states (PA, OH, CO). Measures included language used, stakeholders mentioned, and scientific evidence cited. We use chi-square tests to compare the proportion of articles with each measure of interest in passing versus non-passing states. Results Compared to newspaper coverage of non-passing states, news articles about ERPOs in passing states more often used only official policy names for ERPOs (38% vs. 23%, p = .03), used less restrictive language such as “prevent” to describe the process of suspending firearm access (15% vs. 3%, p < .01), mentioned gun violence prevention advocacy groups (41% vs. 28%, p = .08), and referenced research on ERPOs (17% vs. 7%, p = .03). Articles about passing states also more often explicitly stated that a violent event was or could have been prevented by an ERPO (20% vs. 6%, p < .01). Conclusions Media messaging that frames gun violence as preventable, emphasizes identifiable markers of risk, and draws on data in conjunction with community wisdom may support ERPO policy passage. As more states consider ERPO legislation, especially given endorsement by the Biden-Harris administration, deeper knowledge about successful media framing of these life-saving policies can help shape public understandings and support. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T16:11:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7b0441a9defd403188d5412794659afa |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2458 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T16:11:06Z |
| publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Public Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-7b0441a9defd403188d5412794659afa2022-12-22T03:25:54ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582022-05-012211910.1186/s12889-022-13374-8A comparative content analysis of newspaper coverage about extreme risk protection order policies in passing and non-passing US statesAmanda J. Aubel0Rocco Pallin1Christopher E. Knoepke2Garen J. Wintemute3Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz4Violence Prevention Research Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of MedicineViolence Prevention Research Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of MedicineDivision of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of MedicineViolence Prevention Research Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of MedicineViolence Prevention Research Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of MedicineAbstract Background Extreme risk protection order (ERPO) laws are a tool for firearm violence prevention (in effect in 19 states), often enacted in the wake of a public mass shooting when media coverage of gun violence tends to spike. We compared news media framing of ERPOs in states that passed and those that considered but did not pass such laws after the 2018 mass shooting in Parkland, Florida. Methods We conducted a content analysis of 244 newspaper articles about ERPOs, published in 2018, in three passing (FL, VT, RI) and three non-passing states (PA, OH, CO). Measures included language used, stakeholders mentioned, and scientific evidence cited. We use chi-square tests to compare the proportion of articles with each measure of interest in passing versus non-passing states. Results Compared to newspaper coverage of non-passing states, news articles about ERPOs in passing states more often used only official policy names for ERPOs (38% vs. 23%, p = .03), used less restrictive language such as “prevent” to describe the process of suspending firearm access (15% vs. 3%, p < .01), mentioned gun violence prevention advocacy groups (41% vs. 28%, p = .08), and referenced research on ERPOs (17% vs. 7%, p = .03). Articles about passing states also more often explicitly stated that a violent event was or could have been prevented by an ERPO (20% vs. 6%, p < .01). Conclusions Media messaging that frames gun violence as preventable, emphasizes identifiable markers of risk, and draws on data in conjunction with community wisdom may support ERPO policy passage. As more states consider ERPO legislation, especially given endorsement by the Biden-Harris administration, deeper knowledge about successful media framing of these life-saving policies can help shape public understandings and support.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13374-8Firearm policyViolence preventionMedia framingRed flag lawHealth communicationExtreme risk protection order |
| spellingShingle | Amanda J. Aubel Rocco Pallin Christopher E. Knoepke Garen J. Wintemute Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz A comparative content analysis of newspaper coverage about extreme risk protection order policies in passing and non-passing US states BMC Public Health Firearm policy Violence prevention Media framing Red flag law Health communication Extreme risk protection order |
| title | A comparative content analysis of newspaper coverage about extreme risk protection order policies in passing and non-passing US states |
| title_full | A comparative content analysis of newspaper coverage about extreme risk protection order policies in passing and non-passing US states |
| title_fullStr | A comparative content analysis of newspaper coverage about extreme risk protection order policies in passing and non-passing US states |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparative content analysis of newspaper coverage about extreme risk protection order policies in passing and non-passing US states |
| title_short | A comparative content analysis of newspaper coverage about extreme risk protection order policies in passing and non-passing US states |
| title_sort | comparative content analysis of newspaper coverage about extreme risk protection order policies in passing and non passing us states |
| topic | Firearm policy Violence prevention Media framing Red flag law Health communication Extreme risk protection order |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13374-8 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT amandajaubel acomparativecontentanalysisofnewspapercoverageaboutextremeriskprotectionorderpoliciesinpassingandnonpassingusstates AT roccopallin acomparativecontentanalysisofnewspapercoverageaboutextremeriskprotectionorderpoliciesinpassingandnonpassingusstates AT christophereknoepke acomparativecontentanalysisofnewspapercoverageaboutextremeriskprotectionorderpoliciesinpassingandnonpassingusstates AT garenjwintemute acomparativecontentanalysisofnewspapercoverageaboutextremeriskprotectionorderpoliciesinpassingandnonpassingusstates AT nicolekravitzwirtz acomparativecontentanalysisofnewspapercoverageaboutextremeriskprotectionorderpoliciesinpassingandnonpassingusstates AT amandajaubel comparativecontentanalysisofnewspapercoverageaboutextremeriskprotectionorderpoliciesinpassingandnonpassingusstates AT roccopallin comparativecontentanalysisofnewspapercoverageaboutextremeriskprotectionorderpoliciesinpassingandnonpassingusstates AT christophereknoepke comparativecontentanalysisofnewspapercoverageaboutextremeriskprotectionorderpoliciesinpassingandnonpassingusstates AT garenjwintemute comparativecontentanalysisofnewspapercoverageaboutextremeriskprotectionorderpoliciesinpassingandnonpassingusstates AT nicolekravitzwirtz comparativecontentanalysisofnewspapercoverageaboutextremeriskprotectionorderpoliciesinpassingandnonpassingusstates |