Practical approach to ultrasound of soft tissue tumors and the added value of MRI: how I do it

This review outlines a practical approach to the everyday assessment of both non-neoplastic and neoplastic soft tissue tumors, focusing on ultrasound examination, though emphasizing the added benefit of magnetic resonance imaging in certain instances. Ultrasound approach and assessment, practical sc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Griffith James Francis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2023-11-01
Series:Journal of Ultrasonography
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0036
_version_ 1797435663953428480
author Griffith James Francis
author_facet Griffith James Francis
author_sort Griffith James Francis
collection DOAJ
description This review outlines a practical approach to the everyday assessment of both non-neoplastic and neoplastic soft tissue tumors, focusing on ultrasound examination, though emphasizing the added benefit of magnetic resonance imaging in certain instances. Ultrasound approach and assessment, practical scenarios, reporting, biopsy, and follow-up are covered, as well as the criteria used to distinguish benign from malignant tumors. The potential benefits and current limitations of elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessment are also addressed. Examples of commonly encountered soft tissue tumors are shown. Ultrasound can characterize most soft tissue masses based on their ultrasound appearance alone. Following ultrasound examination, three potential scenarios usually exist in clinical practice: (a) confident regarding diagnosis, (b) indeterminate mass with no evidence of malignancy, and (c) indeterminate mass with possibility of malignancy. A diagnostic pathway for each of these scenarios is provided. Magnetic resonance imaging is generally not helpful in further characterizing masses which are indeterminate on ultrasound assessment, though it is helpful in addressing other issues such as exact tumor location and neurovascular bundle involvement that may not be fully resolved on ultrasound examination. In these situations, magnetic resonance imaging examination can be tailored to address those specific questions that have not been adequately addressed on ultrasound examination. In this sense, both examinations are highly complementary. Tips for undertaking magnetic resonance imaging examinations are provided.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:50:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7b056797b86a40838cf53d3b11a7eac5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2451-070X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:50:33Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Journal of Ultrasonography
spelling doaj.art-7b056797b86a40838cf53d3b11a7eac52023-12-01T07:19:21ZengSciendoJournal of Ultrasonography2451-070X2023-11-012395e299e31210.15557/jou.2023.0036Practical approach to ultrasound of soft tissue tumors and the added value of MRI: how I do itGriffith James Francis0Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Hong KongThis review outlines a practical approach to the everyday assessment of both non-neoplastic and neoplastic soft tissue tumors, focusing on ultrasound examination, though emphasizing the added benefit of magnetic resonance imaging in certain instances. Ultrasound approach and assessment, practical scenarios, reporting, biopsy, and follow-up are covered, as well as the criteria used to distinguish benign from malignant tumors. The potential benefits and current limitations of elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessment are also addressed. Examples of commonly encountered soft tissue tumors are shown. Ultrasound can characterize most soft tissue masses based on their ultrasound appearance alone. Following ultrasound examination, three potential scenarios usually exist in clinical practice: (a) confident regarding diagnosis, (b) indeterminate mass with no evidence of malignancy, and (c) indeterminate mass with possibility of malignancy. A diagnostic pathway for each of these scenarios is provided. Magnetic resonance imaging is generally not helpful in further characterizing masses which are indeterminate on ultrasound assessment, though it is helpful in addressing other issues such as exact tumor location and neurovascular bundle involvement that may not be fully resolved on ultrasound examination. In these situations, magnetic resonance imaging examination can be tailored to address those specific questions that have not been adequately addressed on ultrasound examination. In this sense, both examinations are highly complementary. Tips for undertaking magnetic resonance imaging examinations are provided.https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0036soft tissue tumorultrasoundmrielastographycontrast-enhanced ultrasound
spellingShingle Griffith James Francis
Practical approach to ultrasound of soft tissue tumors and the added value of MRI: how I do it
Journal of Ultrasonography
soft tissue tumor
ultrasound
mri
elastography
contrast-enhanced ultrasound
title Practical approach to ultrasound of soft tissue tumors and the added value of MRI: how I do it
title_full Practical approach to ultrasound of soft tissue tumors and the added value of MRI: how I do it
title_fullStr Practical approach to ultrasound of soft tissue tumors and the added value of MRI: how I do it
title_full_unstemmed Practical approach to ultrasound of soft tissue tumors and the added value of MRI: how I do it
title_short Practical approach to ultrasound of soft tissue tumors and the added value of MRI: how I do it
title_sort practical approach to ultrasound of soft tissue tumors and the added value of mri how i do it
topic soft tissue tumor
ultrasound
mri
elastography
contrast-enhanced ultrasound
url https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2023.0036
work_keys_str_mv AT griffithjamesfrancis practicalapproachtoultrasoundofsofttissuetumorsandtheaddedvalueofmrihowidoit