Do We Really Not Know What Toulmin’s Analytic Arguments Are?
The aim of this paper is to challenge the idea that Toulmin’s main focus in The Uses of Argument is to critique formal deductive logic. I first try to challenge the argument that, on the basis of what Toulmin says about analytic arguments, it is impossible to determine exactly what they are. I will...
Main Author: | Tomáš Kollárik |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2023-09-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/7263 |
Similar Items
-
Toulmin’s “Analytic Arguments”
by: Ben Hamby
Published: (2012-03-01) -
Why We Still Do Not Know What a “Real” Argument Is
by: G.C. Goddu
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Why We Still Do Not Know What a “Real” Argument Is
by: G.C. Goddu
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Legitimation Inferences: An Additional Component for the Toulmin Model
by: G. Thomas Goodnight
Published: (1993-01-01) -
Analysis of Current Scientific News According to Toulmin Argument Model and Determination of Students’ Argument Levels
by: Munise Seçkin Kapucu, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)