Botulinum toxin A versus microwave thermolysis for primary axillary hyperhidrosis: A randomized controlled trialCapsule Summary

Background: Botulinum toxin A (BTX) and microwave thermolysis (MWT) represent 2 treatment modalities for axillary hyperhidrosis with different procedural and efficacy profiles. Objective: To compare long-term outcomes following BTX vs MWT treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. Methods: A prospective,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriela Lladó Grove, MD, Katrine Togsverd-Bo, MD, PhD, DMSc, Claus Zachariae, MD, PhD, DMSc, Merete Haedersdal, MD, PhD, DMSc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-06-01
Series:JAAD International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666328724000099
_version_ 1797266431731040256
author Gabriela Lladó Grove, MD
Katrine Togsverd-Bo, MD, PhD, DMSc
Claus Zachariae, MD, PhD, DMSc
Merete Haedersdal, MD, PhD, DMSc
author_facet Gabriela Lladó Grove, MD
Katrine Togsverd-Bo, MD, PhD, DMSc
Claus Zachariae, MD, PhD, DMSc
Merete Haedersdal, MD, PhD, DMSc
author_sort Gabriela Lladó Grove, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Botulinum toxin A (BTX) and microwave thermolysis (MWT) represent 2 treatment modalities for axillary hyperhidrosis with different procedural and efficacy profiles. Objective: To compare long-term outcomes following BTX vs MWT treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. Methods: A prospective, randomized, within-patient, controlled trial, treating axillary hyperhidrosis with contralateral BTX and MWT. Objective sweat measurement and patient-reported outcome measures for sweat and odor were collected at baseline, 6-month and 1-year follow-up (6M/1YFU). Hair reduction and patient treatment preference was also assessed. Results: Sweat reduction was significant (all P <.01) for both interventions throughout the study. Objectively, sweat reduction was equal at 1-year FU (ΔP =.4282), but greater for BTX than MWT at 6-month FU (ΔP =.0053). Subjective sweat assessment presented comparable efficacy (6MFU: ΔP =.4142, 1YFU: ΔP =.1025). Odor reduction was significant (all P <.01) following both interventions, whereas only sustaining for MWT (6MFU: ΔP =.6826, 1YFU: ΔP =.0098). Long-term, hair reduction was visible after MWT, but not BTX (ΔP ≤.0001), and MWT was preferred by the majority of patients (76%). Limitations: The intrinsic challenges in efficacy assessment. Conclusion: This study exhibited BTX and MWT with similar sweat reduction, but distinguishable odor and hair reduction at 1-year FU. These findings support individualized treatment approaches for axillary hyperhidrosis based on patient-specific symptoms and preferences.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T01:00:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7b1acdeac33b4e9cba2f83b5531175cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-3287
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:00:35Z
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JAAD International
spelling doaj.art-7b1acdeac33b4e9cba2f83b5531175cb2024-03-11T04:11:09ZengElsevierJAAD International2666-32872024-06-01159199Botulinum toxin A versus microwave thermolysis for primary axillary hyperhidrosis: A randomized controlled trialCapsule SummaryGabriela Lladó Grove, MD0Katrine Togsverd-Bo, MD, PhD, DMSc1Claus Zachariae, MD, PhD, DMSc2Merete Haedersdal, MD, PhD, DMSc3Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Correspondence to: Gabriela Lladó Grove, MD, Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Bispebjerg, Nielsine Nielsens Vej 17, building 9, 2nd floor, 2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark.Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkBackground: Botulinum toxin A (BTX) and microwave thermolysis (MWT) represent 2 treatment modalities for axillary hyperhidrosis with different procedural and efficacy profiles. Objective: To compare long-term outcomes following BTX vs MWT treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. Methods: A prospective, randomized, within-patient, controlled trial, treating axillary hyperhidrosis with contralateral BTX and MWT. Objective sweat measurement and patient-reported outcome measures for sweat and odor were collected at baseline, 6-month and 1-year follow-up (6M/1YFU). Hair reduction and patient treatment preference was also assessed. Results: Sweat reduction was significant (all P <.01) for both interventions throughout the study. Objectively, sweat reduction was equal at 1-year FU (ΔP =.4282), but greater for BTX than MWT at 6-month FU (ΔP =.0053). Subjective sweat assessment presented comparable efficacy (6MFU: ΔP =.4142, 1YFU: ΔP =.1025). Odor reduction was significant (all P <.01) following both interventions, whereas only sustaining for MWT (6MFU: ΔP =.6826, 1YFU: ΔP =.0098). Long-term, hair reduction was visible after MWT, but not BTX (ΔP ≤.0001), and MWT was preferred by the majority of patients (76%). Limitations: The intrinsic challenges in efficacy assessment. Conclusion: This study exhibited BTX and MWT with similar sweat reduction, but distinguishable odor and hair reduction at 1-year FU. These findings support individualized treatment approaches for axillary hyperhidrosis based on patient-specific symptoms and preferences.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666328724000099botulinum toxinbromhidrosishyperhidrosisindividualized treatmentmicrowave thermolysisosmidrosis
spellingShingle Gabriela Lladó Grove, MD
Katrine Togsverd-Bo, MD, PhD, DMSc
Claus Zachariae, MD, PhD, DMSc
Merete Haedersdal, MD, PhD, DMSc
Botulinum toxin A versus microwave thermolysis for primary axillary hyperhidrosis: A randomized controlled trialCapsule Summary
JAAD International
botulinum toxin
bromhidrosis
hyperhidrosis
individualized treatment
microwave thermolysis
osmidrosis
title Botulinum toxin A versus microwave thermolysis for primary axillary hyperhidrosis: A randomized controlled trialCapsule Summary
title_full Botulinum toxin A versus microwave thermolysis for primary axillary hyperhidrosis: A randomized controlled trialCapsule Summary
title_fullStr Botulinum toxin A versus microwave thermolysis for primary axillary hyperhidrosis: A randomized controlled trialCapsule Summary
title_full_unstemmed Botulinum toxin A versus microwave thermolysis for primary axillary hyperhidrosis: A randomized controlled trialCapsule Summary
title_short Botulinum toxin A versus microwave thermolysis for primary axillary hyperhidrosis: A randomized controlled trialCapsule Summary
title_sort botulinum toxin a versus microwave thermolysis for primary axillary hyperhidrosis a randomized controlled trialcapsule summary
topic botulinum toxin
bromhidrosis
hyperhidrosis
individualized treatment
microwave thermolysis
osmidrosis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666328724000099
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielalladogrovemd botulinumtoxinaversusmicrowavethermolysisforprimaryaxillaryhyperhidrosisarandomizedcontrolledtrialcapsulesummary
AT katrinetogsverdbomdphddmsc botulinumtoxinaversusmicrowavethermolysisforprimaryaxillaryhyperhidrosisarandomizedcontrolledtrialcapsulesummary
AT clauszachariaemdphddmsc botulinumtoxinaversusmicrowavethermolysisforprimaryaxillaryhyperhidrosisarandomizedcontrolledtrialcapsulesummary
AT meretehaedersdalmdphddmsc botulinumtoxinaversusmicrowavethermolysisforprimaryaxillaryhyperhidrosisarandomizedcontrolledtrialcapsulesummary