How does explicit knowledge inform policy shaping? The case of Burkina Faso’s national social protection policy

In 2009, Burkina Faso embarked on a process leading to the development of a national social protection policy (politique nationale de protection sociale–PNPS) in 2012. The objective of this study was to analyze the circumstances under which explicit knowledge was used to inform the process of emerge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kadidiatou Kadio, Christian Dagenais, Valery Ridde
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138829/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1797836086582444032
author Kadidiatou Kadio
Christian Dagenais
Valery Ridde
author_facet Kadidiatou Kadio
Christian Dagenais
Valery Ridde
author_sort Kadidiatou Kadio
collection DOAJ
description In 2009, Burkina Faso embarked on a process leading to the development of a national social protection policy (politique nationale de protection sociale–PNPS) in 2012. The objective of this study was to analyze the circumstances under which explicit knowledge was used to inform the process of emergence and formulation PNPS. The term explicit knowledge excludes tacit and experiential knowledge, taking into account research data, grey literature, and monitoring data. Court and Young’s conceptual framework was adapted by integrating concepts from political science, such as Kingdon’s Multiple Streams framework. Discursive and documentary data were collected from 30 respondents from national and international institutions. Thematic analysis guided the data processing. Results showed that use of peer-reviewed academic research was not explicitly mentioned by respondents, in contrast to other types of knowledge, such as national statistical data, reports on government program evaluations, and reports on studies by international institutions and NGOs, also called technical and financial partners (TFPs). The emergence phase was more informed by grey literature and monitoring data. In this phase, national actors deepened and increased their knowledge (conceptual use) on the importance and challenges of social protection. The role of explicit knowledge in the formulation phase was nuanced. The actors’ thinking was little guided by the question of whether the solutions had the capacity to solve the problem in the Burkina Faso context. Choices were based very little on analysis of strategies (effectiveness, equity, unintended effects) and their applicability (cost, acceptability, feasibility). This way of working was due in part to actors’ limited knowledge on social protection and the lack of government guidance on strategic choices. Strategic use was clearly identified. It involved citing knowledge (reports on studies conducted by TFPs) to justify the utility and feasibility of a PNPS. Instrumental use consisted of drawing from workshop presentations and study reports when writing sections of the PNPS. The consideration of a recommendation based on explicit knowledge was influenced by perceived political gains, i.e., potential social and political consequences.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:03:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7b2b5162a0174dff85de8d997b3dc411
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:03:01Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-7b2b5162a0174dff85de8d997b3dc4112023-05-01T05:31:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01184How does explicit knowledge inform policy shaping? The case of Burkina Faso’s national social protection policyKadidiatou KadioChristian DagenaisValery RiddeIn 2009, Burkina Faso embarked on a process leading to the development of a national social protection policy (politique nationale de protection sociale–PNPS) in 2012. The objective of this study was to analyze the circumstances under which explicit knowledge was used to inform the process of emergence and formulation PNPS. The term explicit knowledge excludes tacit and experiential knowledge, taking into account research data, grey literature, and monitoring data. Court and Young’s conceptual framework was adapted by integrating concepts from political science, such as Kingdon’s Multiple Streams framework. Discursive and documentary data were collected from 30 respondents from national and international institutions. Thematic analysis guided the data processing. Results showed that use of peer-reviewed academic research was not explicitly mentioned by respondents, in contrast to other types of knowledge, such as national statistical data, reports on government program evaluations, and reports on studies by international institutions and NGOs, also called technical and financial partners (TFPs). The emergence phase was more informed by grey literature and monitoring data. In this phase, national actors deepened and increased their knowledge (conceptual use) on the importance and challenges of social protection. The role of explicit knowledge in the formulation phase was nuanced. The actors’ thinking was little guided by the question of whether the solutions had the capacity to solve the problem in the Burkina Faso context. Choices were based very little on analysis of strategies (effectiveness, equity, unintended effects) and their applicability (cost, acceptability, feasibility). This way of working was due in part to actors’ limited knowledge on social protection and the lack of government guidance on strategic choices. Strategic use was clearly identified. It involved citing knowledge (reports on studies conducted by TFPs) to justify the utility and feasibility of a PNPS. Instrumental use consisted of drawing from workshop presentations and study reports when writing sections of the PNPS. The consideration of a recommendation based on explicit knowledge was influenced by perceived political gains, i.e., potential social and political consequences.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138829/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Kadidiatou Kadio
Christian Dagenais
Valery Ridde
How does explicit knowledge inform policy shaping? The case of Burkina Faso’s national social protection policy
PLoS ONE
title How does explicit knowledge inform policy shaping? The case of Burkina Faso’s national social protection policy
title_full How does explicit knowledge inform policy shaping? The case of Burkina Faso’s national social protection policy
title_fullStr How does explicit knowledge inform policy shaping? The case of Burkina Faso’s national social protection policy
title_full_unstemmed How does explicit knowledge inform policy shaping? The case of Burkina Faso’s national social protection policy
title_short How does explicit knowledge inform policy shaping? The case of Burkina Faso’s national social protection policy
title_sort how does explicit knowledge inform policy shaping the case of burkina faso s national social protection policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138829/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT kadidiatoukadio howdoesexplicitknowledgeinformpolicyshapingthecaseofburkinafasosnationalsocialprotectionpolicy
AT christiandagenais howdoesexplicitknowledgeinformpolicyshapingthecaseofburkinafasosnationalsocialprotectionpolicy
AT valeryridde howdoesexplicitknowledgeinformpolicyshapingthecaseofburkinafasosnationalsocialprotectionpolicy