A comparison of type I error and power of Bartlett’s test, Levene’s test and Cochran’s test under violation of assumptions

This study compared the probability of Type I error and the power of three statistical tests (Bartlett, Levene and Cochran) by varying the sampling distribution, variances and sample sizes. Monte Carlo methods were used to generate responses based on sample sizes and distributions 1,000 times. The s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chukiat Viwatwongkasem, Thavatchai Vorapongsathorn, Sineenart Taejaroenkul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Prince of Songkla University 2004-05-01
Series:Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology (SJST)
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sjst.psu.ac.th/journal/26-4pdf/11-error-of-assumption.pdf
_version_ 1818929347473440768
author Chukiat Viwatwongkasem
Thavatchai Vorapongsathorn
Sineenart Taejaroenkul
author_facet Chukiat Viwatwongkasem
Thavatchai Vorapongsathorn
Sineenart Taejaroenkul
author_sort Chukiat Viwatwongkasem
collection DOAJ
description This study compared the probability of Type I error and the power of three statistical tests (Bartlett, Levene and Cochran) by varying the sampling distribution, variances and sample sizes. Monte Carlo methods were used to generate responses based on sample sizes and distributions 1,000 times. The sample sizes were both equal and unequal: 15, 30 and 45. The data distributions were Normal, Gamma and Chi-square. It was found that Bartlett’s test was sensitive to the normality assumption whereas Cochran’s test and Levene’s test were robust when the normal assumption was violated. Moreover, Levene’s test was quite good for both equal and small sample sizes. In the case of power, Bartlett’s test had the highest power in all cases. When one variance was large, Cochran’s test was the best test. The recommendations from this study are that: Bartlett’s test is the best test for homogeneity of variances since it is not affected by sample size. When data are non-normally distributed, Levene’s test is a good choice for small equal sample sizes. Cochran’s test is best when sample size is large and unequal and one variance is larger.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T03:43:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7b3d4cacbebf470badd9165fed04c55b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0125-3395
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T03:43:22Z
publishDate 2004-05-01
publisher Prince of Songkla University
record_format Article
series Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology (SJST)
spelling doaj.art-7b3d4cacbebf470badd9165fed04c55b2022-12-21T19:54:40ZengPrince of Songkla UniversitySongklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology (SJST)0125-33952004-05-01264537547A comparison of type I error and power of Bartlett’s test, Levene’s test and Cochran’s test under violation of assumptionsChukiat ViwatwongkasemThavatchai VorapongsathornSineenart TaejaroenkulThis study compared the probability of Type I error and the power of three statistical tests (Bartlett, Levene and Cochran) by varying the sampling distribution, variances and sample sizes. Monte Carlo methods were used to generate responses based on sample sizes and distributions 1,000 times. The sample sizes were both equal and unequal: 15, 30 and 45. The data distributions were Normal, Gamma and Chi-square. It was found that Bartlett’s test was sensitive to the normality assumption whereas Cochran’s test and Levene’s test were robust when the normal assumption was violated. Moreover, Levene’s test was quite good for both equal and small sample sizes. In the case of power, Bartlett’s test had the highest power in all cases. When one variance was large, Cochran’s test was the best test. The recommendations from this study are that: Bartlett’s test is the best test for homogeneity of variances since it is not affected by sample size. When data are non-normally distributed, Levene’s test is a good choice for small equal sample sizes. Cochran’s test is best when sample size is large and unequal and one variance is larger.http://www.sjst.psu.ac.th/journal/26-4pdf/11-error-of-assumption.pdfhomogeneity of varianceBartlett’s testLevene’s testCochran’s testsimulation
spellingShingle Chukiat Viwatwongkasem
Thavatchai Vorapongsathorn
Sineenart Taejaroenkul
A comparison of type I error and power of Bartlett’s test, Levene’s test and Cochran’s test under violation of assumptions
Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology (SJST)
homogeneity of variance
Bartlett’s test
Levene’s test
Cochran’s test
simulation
title A comparison of type I error and power of Bartlett’s test, Levene’s test and Cochran’s test under violation of assumptions
title_full A comparison of type I error and power of Bartlett’s test, Levene’s test and Cochran’s test under violation of assumptions
title_fullStr A comparison of type I error and power of Bartlett’s test, Levene’s test and Cochran’s test under violation of assumptions
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of type I error and power of Bartlett’s test, Levene’s test and Cochran’s test under violation of assumptions
title_short A comparison of type I error and power of Bartlett’s test, Levene’s test and Cochran’s test under violation of assumptions
title_sort comparison of type i error and power of bartlett s test levene s test and cochran s test under violation of assumptions
topic homogeneity of variance
Bartlett’s test
Levene’s test
Cochran’s test
simulation
url http://www.sjst.psu.ac.th/journal/26-4pdf/11-error-of-assumption.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT chukiatviwatwongkasem acomparisonoftypeierrorandpowerofbartlettstestlevenestestandcochranstestunderviolationofassumptions
AT thavatchaivorapongsathorn acomparisonoftypeierrorandpowerofbartlettstestlevenestestandcochranstestunderviolationofassumptions
AT sineenarttaejaroenkul acomparisonoftypeierrorandpowerofbartlettstestlevenestestandcochranstestunderviolationofassumptions
AT chukiatviwatwongkasem comparisonoftypeierrorandpowerofbartlettstestlevenestestandcochranstestunderviolationofassumptions
AT thavatchaivorapongsathorn comparisonoftypeierrorandpowerofbartlettstestlevenestestandcochranstestunderviolationofassumptions
AT sineenarttaejaroenkul comparisonoftypeierrorandpowerofbartlettstestlevenestestandcochranstestunderviolationofassumptions