Evaluating a Salmonella Typhimurium, Eimeria maxima, and Clostridium perfringens coinfection necrotic enteritis model in broiler chickens: repeatability, dosing, and immune outcomes

ABSTRACT: Coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis negatively impact poultry production, making challenge model repeatability important for evaluating mitigation strategies. Study objectives were: 1) evaluate Salmonella Typhimurium–Eimeria maxima–Clostridium perfringens necrotic enteritis coinfection mode...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. Fries-Craft, D. Graham, B.M. Hargis, E.A. Bobeck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-11-01
Series:Poultry Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579123005370
_version_ 1797660116263108608
author K. Fries-Craft
D. Graham
B.M. Hargis
E.A. Bobeck
author_facet K. Fries-Craft
D. Graham
B.M. Hargis
E.A. Bobeck
author_sort K. Fries-Craft
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT: Coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis negatively impact poultry production, making challenge model repeatability important for evaluating mitigation strategies. Study objectives were: 1) evaluate Salmonella Typhimurium–Eimeria maxima–Clostridium perfringens necrotic enteritis coinfection model repeatability and 2) investigate E. maxima dose and early S. Typhimurium challenge on immune responses. Three trials using Ross 308 chicks assigned to 12 cages/trial (7 chicks/cage) in wire-floor brooders were completed. Trials 1 and 2 determined E. maxima dose for necrotic enteritis challenge in trial 3. Chicks in trials 1 and 2 were inoculated with 0 (control), 5, 15, or 25,000 sporulated E. maxima M6 oocysts on d 14 and jejunal lesion scores evaluated on d 20. In trial 3, chicks were assigned to control or necrotic enteritis challenge (42 chicks/group). Necrotic enteritis challenge chicks were inoculated with 1 × 105 colony forming units (CFU) S. Typhimurium on d 1, 15,000 E. maxima oocysts on d 14, and 1 × 108 CFU C. perfringens on d 19 and 20 with lesion scoring on d 22. Bird and feeder weights were recorded throughout each trial. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from 1 chick/cage at baseline (all trials), 4 chicks/dose (trials 1 and 2) or 8 chicks/challenge (trial 3) 24 h post-inoculation (pi) with E. maxima for immunometabolic assays and immune cell profiling. Data were analyzed by mixed procedure (SAS 9.4) with challenge and timepoint fixed effects (P ≤ 0.05, trends 0.05 ≤ P ≤ 0.01). Inoculating chicks with 15,000 E. maxima oocysts increased d 14 to 20 FCR 79 points (trials 1 and 2; P = 0.009) vs. unchallenged chicks and achieved a target lesion score of 2. While C. perfringens challenge reduced trial 3 performance, average lesion scores were <1. Salmonella inoculation on d 1 tended to increase PBMC ATP production 41.6% 24 hpi with E. maxima vs. chicks challenged with E. maxima only (P = 0.06). These results provide insight for future model optimization and considerations regarding S. Typhimurium's effect on E. maxima immune response timelines.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T18:25:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7b401c63dfb441e8929374f3b8096bc9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0032-5791
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T18:25:07Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Poultry Science
spelling doaj.art-7b401c63dfb441e8929374f3b8096bc92023-10-14T04:43:50ZengElsevierPoultry Science0032-57912023-11-0110211103018Evaluating a Salmonella Typhimurium, Eimeria maxima, and Clostridium perfringens coinfection necrotic enteritis model in broiler chickens: repeatability, dosing, and immune outcomesK. Fries-Craft0D. Graham1B.M. Hargis2E.A. Bobeck3Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USADepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USADepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USADepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA; Corresponding author:ABSTRACT: Coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis negatively impact poultry production, making challenge model repeatability important for evaluating mitigation strategies. Study objectives were: 1) evaluate Salmonella Typhimurium–Eimeria maxima–Clostridium perfringens necrotic enteritis coinfection model repeatability and 2) investigate E. maxima dose and early S. Typhimurium challenge on immune responses. Three trials using Ross 308 chicks assigned to 12 cages/trial (7 chicks/cage) in wire-floor brooders were completed. Trials 1 and 2 determined E. maxima dose for necrotic enteritis challenge in trial 3. Chicks in trials 1 and 2 were inoculated with 0 (control), 5, 15, or 25,000 sporulated E. maxima M6 oocysts on d 14 and jejunal lesion scores evaluated on d 20. In trial 3, chicks were assigned to control or necrotic enteritis challenge (42 chicks/group). Necrotic enteritis challenge chicks were inoculated with 1 × 105 colony forming units (CFU) S. Typhimurium on d 1, 15,000 E. maxima oocysts on d 14, and 1 × 108 CFU C. perfringens on d 19 and 20 with lesion scoring on d 22. Bird and feeder weights were recorded throughout each trial. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from 1 chick/cage at baseline (all trials), 4 chicks/dose (trials 1 and 2) or 8 chicks/challenge (trial 3) 24 h post-inoculation (pi) with E. maxima for immunometabolic assays and immune cell profiling. Data were analyzed by mixed procedure (SAS 9.4) with challenge and timepoint fixed effects (P ≤ 0.05, trends 0.05 ≤ P ≤ 0.01). Inoculating chicks with 15,000 E. maxima oocysts increased d 14 to 20 FCR 79 points (trials 1 and 2; P = 0.009) vs. unchallenged chicks and achieved a target lesion score of 2. While C. perfringens challenge reduced trial 3 performance, average lesion scores were <1. Salmonella inoculation on d 1 tended to increase PBMC ATP production 41.6% 24 hpi with E. maxima vs. chicks challenged with E. maxima only (P = 0.06). These results provide insight for future model optimization and considerations regarding S. Typhimurium's effect on E. maxima immune response timelines.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579123005370Eimeria maximaSalmonella TyphimuriumClostridium perfringensimmunometabolismflow cytometry
spellingShingle K. Fries-Craft
D. Graham
B.M. Hargis
E.A. Bobeck
Evaluating a Salmonella Typhimurium, Eimeria maxima, and Clostridium perfringens coinfection necrotic enteritis model in broiler chickens: repeatability, dosing, and immune outcomes
Poultry Science
Eimeria maxima
Salmonella Typhimurium
Clostridium perfringens
immunometabolism
flow cytometry
title Evaluating a Salmonella Typhimurium, Eimeria maxima, and Clostridium perfringens coinfection necrotic enteritis model in broiler chickens: repeatability, dosing, and immune outcomes
title_full Evaluating a Salmonella Typhimurium, Eimeria maxima, and Clostridium perfringens coinfection necrotic enteritis model in broiler chickens: repeatability, dosing, and immune outcomes
title_fullStr Evaluating a Salmonella Typhimurium, Eimeria maxima, and Clostridium perfringens coinfection necrotic enteritis model in broiler chickens: repeatability, dosing, and immune outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a Salmonella Typhimurium, Eimeria maxima, and Clostridium perfringens coinfection necrotic enteritis model in broiler chickens: repeatability, dosing, and immune outcomes
title_short Evaluating a Salmonella Typhimurium, Eimeria maxima, and Clostridium perfringens coinfection necrotic enteritis model in broiler chickens: repeatability, dosing, and immune outcomes
title_sort evaluating a salmonella typhimurium eimeria maxima and clostridium perfringens coinfection necrotic enteritis model in broiler chickens repeatability dosing and immune outcomes
topic Eimeria maxima
Salmonella Typhimurium
Clostridium perfringens
immunometabolism
flow cytometry
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579123005370
work_keys_str_mv AT kfriescraft evaluatingasalmonellatyphimuriumeimeriamaximaandclostridiumperfringenscoinfectionnecroticenteritismodelinbroilerchickensrepeatabilitydosingandimmuneoutcomes
AT dgraham evaluatingasalmonellatyphimuriumeimeriamaximaandclostridiumperfringenscoinfectionnecroticenteritismodelinbroilerchickensrepeatabilitydosingandimmuneoutcomes
AT bmhargis evaluatingasalmonellatyphimuriumeimeriamaximaandclostridiumperfringenscoinfectionnecroticenteritismodelinbroilerchickensrepeatabilitydosingandimmuneoutcomes
AT eabobeck evaluatingasalmonellatyphimuriumeimeriamaximaandclostridiumperfringenscoinfectionnecroticenteritismodelinbroilerchickensrepeatabilitydosingandimmuneoutcomes