Boundary work in collaborative inquiry: Framing the contributions

This article situates the contributions to this special issue. It does so by examining the process of methodological justification and the relations between the content of knowledge and the context of production. Boundary work concerning these dynamics, along with issues applicability and credibilit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tim May
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-11-01
Series:Methodological Innovations
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991221129783
_version_ 1798022513879416832
author Tim May
author_facet Tim May
author_sort Tim May
collection DOAJ
description This article situates the contributions to this special issue. It does so by examining the process of methodological justification and the relations between the content of knowledge and the context of production. Boundary work concerning these dynamics, along with issues applicability and credibility, along with the university as a core site of social research practice, are discussed. Once engagement with communities comes into the process of co-production, there is an ambivalence both among academics and universities concerning the place of such work. This leads to a set of devilish dichotomies in research practice that requires intensive boundary work in a process characterized as active intermediation between varying expectations. Framing the contributions in this way enables an enlargement of the scope of research with different communities in terms of boundaries of practice, whilst also questioning the selectivity that informs the impact and engagement agendas in universities.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T17:31:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7b4e1ea5786742ae86e7438e68b0272c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-7991
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T17:31:11Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Methodological Innovations
spelling doaj.art-7b4e1ea5786742ae86e7438e68b0272c2022-12-22T04:12:02ZengSAGE PublishingMethodological Innovations2059-79912022-11-011510.1177/20597991221129783Boundary work in collaborative inquiry: Framing the contributionsTim MayThis article situates the contributions to this special issue. It does so by examining the process of methodological justification and the relations between the content of knowledge and the context of production. Boundary work concerning these dynamics, along with issues applicability and credibility, along with the university as a core site of social research practice, are discussed. Once engagement with communities comes into the process of co-production, there is an ambivalence both among academics and universities concerning the place of such work. This leads to a set of devilish dichotomies in research practice that requires intensive boundary work in a process characterized as active intermediation between varying expectations. Framing the contributions in this way enables an enlargement of the scope of research with different communities in terms of boundaries of practice, whilst also questioning the selectivity that informs the impact and engagement agendas in universities.https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991221129783
spellingShingle Tim May
Boundary work in collaborative inquiry: Framing the contributions
Methodological Innovations
title Boundary work in collaborative inquiry: Framing the contributions
title_full Boundary work in collaborative inquiry: Framing the contributions
title_fullStr Boundary work in collaborative inquiry: Framing the contributions
title_full_unstemmed Boundary work in collaborative inquiry: Framing the contributions
title_short Boundary work in collaborative inquiry: Framing the contributions
title_sort boundary work in collaborative inquiry framing the contributions
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991221129783
work_keys_str_mv AT timmay boundaryworkincollaborativeinquiryframingthecontributions