STUDIES ON PYCNODONT FISHES (I): EVALUATION OF THEIR PHYLOGENETIC POSITION AMONG ACTINOPTERYGIANS

One of the main pending, unsolved problems concerning the study of the pycnodont fishes is their phylogenetic relationships with other major actinopterygian groups. The Pycnodontiformes have often been proposed as the sister group of the Telostei or the Teleosteomorpha. The first extensive cladistic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: FRANCISCO JOSÉ POYATO-ARIZA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Milano University Press 2015-11-01
Series:Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/RIPS/article/view/6521
_version_ 1797709814612099072
author FRANCISCO JOSÉ POYATO-ARIZA
author_facet FRANCISCO JOSÉ POYATO-ARIZA
author_sort FRANCISCO JOSÉ POYATO-ARIZA
collection DOAJ
description One of the main pending, unsolved problems concerning the study of the pycnodont fishes is their phylogenetic relationships with other major actinopterygian groups. The Pycnodontiformes have often been proposed as the sister group of the Telostei or the Teleosteomorpha. The first extensive cladistic analysis on pycnodont relationships is hereby attempted by coding Pycnodontiformes into a previously existing data matrix with major neopterygian groups: Lepisosteiformes, Semionotiformes, Macrosemiiformes, Halecomorphi, and Teleostei. This analysis has resulted on the Pycnodontiformes having an unexpected position as the most basal Neopterygii among the groups included. Therefore, pycnodonts are not the sister-group of teleosteans, and they are not holosteans either. The phylogenetic relationships and the definition of the Holostei and the Gynglimodi are not affected by the inclusion of the Pycnodontiformes, but the basal position of the latter among Neopterygii may affect the definition of this traditional major actinopterygian group. A collateral consequence of these results is that the Halecostomi can be re-defined as the clade formed by [Holostei + Teleostei]. The phylogenetic relationships of pycnodonts should, consequently, be solved among basal neopterygian groups, mostly from the Triassic, as well as relevant non-neopterygian actinopterygians in order to confirm the neopterygian affinities of the Pycnodontiformes and to verify the definition and diagnosis of the Neopterygii and the Halecostomi.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T06:43:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7b686065f49d482abfcd58507c2495d8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0035-6883
2039-4942
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T06:43:19Z
publishDate 2015-11-01
publisher Milano University Press
record_format Article
series Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia
spelling doaj.art-7b686065f49d482abfcd58507c2495d82023-09-03T00:53:14ZengMilano University PressRivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia0035-68832039-49422015-11-01121310.13130/2039-4942/65215806STUDIES ON PYCNODONT FISHES (I): EVALUATION OF THEIR PHYLOGENETIC POSITION AMONG ACTINOPTERYGIANSFRANCISCO JOSÉ POYATO-ARIZAOne of the main pending, unsolved problems concerning the study of the pycnodont fishes is their phylogenetic relationships with other major actinopterygian groups. The Pycnodontiformes have often been proposed as the sister group of the Telostei or the Teleosteomorpha. The first extensive cladistic analysis on pycnodont relationships is hereby attempted by coding Pycnodontiformes into a previously existing data matrix with major neopterygian groups: Lepisosteiformes, Semionotiformes, Macrosemiiformes, Halecomorphi, and Teleostei. This analysis has resulted on the Pycnodontiformes having an unexpected position as the most basal Neopterygii among the groups included. Therefore, pycnodonts are not the sister-group of teleosteans, and they are not holosteans either. The phylogenetic relationships and the definition of the Holostei and the Gynglimodi are not affected by the inclusion of the Pycnodontiformes, but the basal position of the latter among Neopterygii may affect the definition of this traditional major actinopterygian group. A collateral consequence of these results is that the Halecostomi can be re-defined as the clade formed by [Holostei + Teleostei]. The phylogenetic relationships of pycnodonts should, consequently, be solved among basal neopterygian groups, mostly from the Triassic, as well as relevant non-neopterygian actinopterygians in order to confirm the neopterygian affinities of the Pycnodontiformes and to verify the definition and diagnosis of the Neopterygii and the Halecostomi.https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/RIPS/article/view/6521ActinopterygiiHalecostomiHolosteiNeopterygiiPhylogenetic RelationshipsPycnodontiformesTeleostei
spellingShingle FRANCISCO JOSÉ POYATO-ARIZA
STUDIES ON PYCNODONT FISHES (I): EVALUATION OF THEIR PHYLOGENETIC POSITION AMONG ACTINOPTERYGIANS
Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia
Actinopterygii
Halecostomi
Holostei
Neopterygii
Phylogenetic Relationships
Pycnodontiformes
Teleostei
title STUDIES ON PYCNODONT FISHES (I): EVALUATION OF THEIR PHYLOGENETIC POSITION AMONG ACTINOPTERYGIANS
title_full STUDIES ON PYCNODONT FISHES (I): EVALUATION OF THEIR PHYLOGENETIC POSITION AMONG ACTINOPTERYGIANS
title_fullStr STUDIES ON PYCNODONT FISHES (I): EVALUATION OF THEIR PHYLOGENETIC POSITION AMONG ACTINOPTERYGIANS
title_full_unstemmed STUDIES ON PYCNODONT FISHES (I): EVALUATION OF THEIR PHYLOGENETIC POSITION AMONG ACTINOPTERYGIANS
title_short STUDIES ON PYCNODONT FISHES (I): EVALUATION OF THEIR PHYLOGENETIC POSITION AMONG ACTINOPTERYGIANS
title_sort studies on pycnodont fishes i evaluation of their phylogenetic position among actinopterygians
topic Actinopterygii
Halecostomi
Holostei
Neopterygii
Phylogenetic Relationships
Pycnodontiformes
Teleostei
url https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/RIPS/article/view/6521
work_keys_str_mv AT franciscojosepoyatoariza studiesonpycnodontfishesievaluationoftheirphylogeneticpositionamongactinopterygians