Head-to-head comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial AC stimulation and transcranial DC stimulation for tinnitus

Tinnitus is the perception of a sound in the absence of an external sound stimulus. This phantom sound has been related to plastic changes and hyperactivity in the auditory cortex. Different neuromodulation techniques such as TMS and tDCS have been used in an attempt to modify local and distant neur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sven eVanneste, Felipe eFregni, Dirk eDe Ridder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00158/full
_version_ 1828398156178522112
author Sven eVanneste
Felipe eFregni
Dirk eDe Ridder
author_facet Sven eVanneste
Felipe eFregni
Dirk eDe Ridder
author_sort Sven eVanneste
collection DOAJ
description Tinnitus is the perception of a sound in the absence of an external sound stimulus. This phantom sound has been related to plastic changes and hyperactivity in the auditory cortex. Different neuromodulation techniques such as TMS and tDCS have been used in an attempt to modify local and distant neuroplasticity as to reduce tinnitus symptoms. Recently, two techniques of pulsed electrical stimulation using weak electrical currents - transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) - have also shown significant neuromodulatory effects. In the present study we conducted the first head-to-head comparison of three different transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques, namely tDCS, tACS and tRNS in 111 tinnitus patients by placing the electrodes overlying the auditory cortex bilaterally. The results demonstrated that tRNS induced the larger transient suppresive effect on the tinnitus loudness and the tinnitus related distress as compared to tDCS and tACS. Both tDCS and tACS induced small and non-significant effects on tinnitus symptoms, supporting the superior effects of tRNS as a method for tinnitus suppression.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T08:57:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7b7b8f7d620a46f68e1c090574aeb16c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T08:57:17Z
publishDate 2013-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-7b7b8f7d620a46f68e1c090574aeb16c2022-12-22T01:55:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402013-12-01410.3389/fpsyt.2013.0015871153Head-to-head comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial AC stimulation and transcranial DC stimulation for tinnitusSven eVanneste0Felipe eFregni1Dirk eDe Ridder2University of Texas at DallasHarvard UnversityUniversity of OtagoTinnitus is the perception of a sound in the absence of an external sound stimulus. This phantom sound has been related to plastic changes and hyperactivity in the auditory cortex. Different neuromodulation techniques such as TMS and tDCS have been used in an attempt to modify local and distant neuroplasticity as to reduce tinnitus symptoms. Recently, two techniques of pulsed electrical stimulation using weak electrical currents - transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) - have also shown significant neuromodulatory effects. In the present study we conducted the first head-to-head comparison of three different transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques, namely tDCS, tACS and tRNS in 111 tinnitus patients by placing the electrodes overlying the auditory cortex bilaterally. The results demonstrated that tRNS induced the larger transient suppresive effect on the tinnitus loudness and the tinnitus related distress as compared to tDCS and tACS. Both tDCS and tACS induced small and non-significant effects on tinnitus symptoms, supporting the superior effects of tRNS as a method for tinnitus suppression.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00158/fullTinnitustDCSTACsdistressloudnesstRNS
spellingShingle Sven eVanneste
Felipe eFregni
Dirk eDe Ridder
Head-to-head comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial AC stimulation and transcranial DC stimulation for tinnitus
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Tinnitus
tDCS
TACs
distress
loudness
tRNS
title Head-to-head comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial AC stimulation and transcranial DC stimulation for tinnitus
title_full Head-to-head comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial AC stimulation and transcranial DC stimulation for tinnitus
title_fullStr Head-to-head comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial AC stimulation and transcranial DC stimulation for tinnitus
title_full_unstemmed Head-to-head comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial AC stimulation and transcranial DC stimulation for tinnitus
title_short Head-to-head comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial AC stimulation and transcranial DC stimulation for tinnitus
title_sort head to head comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation transcranial ac stimulation and transcranial dc stimulation for tinnitus
topic Tinnitus
tDCS
TACs
distress
loudness
tRNS
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00158/full
work_keys_str_mv AT svenevanneste headtoheadcomparisonoftranscranialrandomnoisestimulationtranscranialacstimulationandtranscranialdcstimulationfortinnitus
AT felipeefregni headtoheadcomparisonoftranscranialrandomnoisestimulationtranscranialacstimulationandtranscranialdcstimulationfortinnitus
AT dirkederidder headtoheadcomparisonoftranscranialrandomnoisestimulationtranscranialacstimulationandtranscranialdcstimulationfortinnitus