Bringing Ancillary Actions outside the Time-Limit
AbstractAccording to some articles of civil procedure code (as articles 135, 136 and143) some ancillary actions (such as counter-claim and impleader) should bemade within certain time-limits. In case of not considering the time limits andbringing these actions outside the time-limits, there are thre...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
2013-11-01
|
| Series: | Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_180_2e498bbe08f49035d944d781e87dea59.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797375868849356800 |
|---|---|
| author | Mehdi Hasanzadeh |
| author_facet | Mehdi Hasanzadeh |
| author_sort | Mehdi Hasanzadeh |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | AbstractAccording to some articles of civil procedure code (as articles 135, 136 and143) some ancillary actions (such as counter-claim and impleader) should bemade within certain time-limits. In case of not considering the time limits andbringing these actions outside the time-limits, there are three theories; A)dismissal of action, B) separating the action and trying the claim separately C)differentiating between the cases related to the main claim and the non-relatedones, trying the firstones together and trying the latterseparately. There areviewpoints, reasoning and criticisms about acceptance and rejection of eachtheory. However, reasons of the third theory are stronger and its criticisms areweaker. So this theory is more acceptable. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:30:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7b824da5df704e859d8309fdcb2c99f4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2345-3583 2476-6232 |
| language | fas |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T19:30:28Z |
| publishDate | 2013-11-01 |
| publisher | Allameh Tabataba'i University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī |
| spelling | doaj.art-7b824da5df704e859d8309fdcb2c99f42023-12-26T07:46:30ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressFaṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī2345-35832476-62322013-11-01243962180Bringing Ancillary Actions outside the Time-LimitMehdi Hasanzadeh0استادیار حقوق خصوصی دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه قمAbstractAccording to some articles of civil procedure code (as articles 135, 136 and143) some ancillary actions (such as counter-claim and impleader) should bemade within certain time-limits. In case of not considering the time limits andbringing these actions outside the time-limits, there are three theories; A)dismissal of action, B) separating the action and trying the claim separately C)differentiating between the cases related to the main claim and the non-relatedones, trying the firstones together and trying the latterseparately. There areviewpoints, reasoning and criticisms about acceptance and rejection of eachtheory. However, reasons of the third theory are stronger and its criticisms areweaker. So this theory is more acceptable.https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_180_2e498bbe08f49035d944d781e87dea59.pdfkeywords: counter-claimimpleaderfurther claimancillary actionoriginal action |
| spellingShingle | Mehdi Hasanzadeh Bringing Ancillary Actions outside the Time-Limit Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Khuṣūṣī keywords: counter-claim impleader further claim ancillary action original action |
| title | Bringing Ancillary Actions outside the Time-Limit |
| title_full | Bringing Ancillary Actions outside the Time-Limit |
| title_fullStr | Bringing Ancillary Actions outside the Time-Limit |
| title_full_unstemmed | Bringing Ancillary Actions outside the Time-Limit |
| title_short | Bringing Ancillary Actions outside the Time-Limit |
| title_sort | bringing ancillary actions outside the time limit |
| topic | keywords: counter-claim impleader further claim ancillary action original action |
| url | https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_180_2e498bbe08f49035d944d781e87dea59.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mehdihasanzadeh bringingancillaryactionsoutsidethetimelimit |