Comparative effects of EMG-driven robot-assisted therapy versus task-oriented training on motor and daily function in patients with stroke: a randomized cross-over trial

Abstract Background Robot-assisted hand training has shown positive effects on promoting neuromuscular control. Since both robot-assisted therapy and task-oriented training are often used in post-stroke rehabilitation, we raised the question of whether two interventions engender differential effects...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yen-Wei Chen, Wei-Chi Chiang, Chia-Ling Chang, Shih-Ming Lo, Ching-Yi Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00961-w
_version_ 1798025224706326528
author Yen-Wei Chen
Wei-Chi Chiang
Chia-Ling Chang
Shih-Ming Lo
Ching-Yi Wu
author_facet Yen-Wei Chen
Wei-Chi Chiang
Chia-Ling Chang
Shih-Ming Lo
Ching-Yi Wu
author_sort Yen-Wei Chen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Robot-assisted hand training has shown positive effects on promoting neuromuscular control. Since both robot-assisted therapy and task-oriented training are often used in post-stroke rehabilitation, we raised the question of whether two interventions engender differential effects in different domains. Methods The study was conducted using a randomized, two-period crossover design. Twenty-four chronic stroke survivors received a 12-session robot-assisted intervention followed by a 12-session task-oriented intervention or vice versa. A 1-month washout period between each intervention was implemented. Outcome measures were evaluated before the intervention, after the first 12-session intervention, and after the second 12-session intervention. Clinical assessments included Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity, Wolf Motor Function Test, Action Research Arm Test and Motor Activity Log. Results Our findings suggested that EMG-driven robot-assisted therapy was as effective as task-oriented training in terms of improving upper limbs functional performance in activity domain, and robot-assisted therapy was more effective in improving movement duration during functional tasks. Task-oriented training showed better improvement in body function domain and activity and participation domain, especially in improving spontaneous use of affected arm during daily activities. Conclusions Both intervention protocol had their own advantages in different domains, and robot-assisted therapy may save manpower and be considered as an alternative intervention to task-oriented training. Combining the two approaches could yield results greater than either alone, which awaits further study. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03624153. Registered on 9th August 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03624153 .
first_indexed 2024-04-11T18:15:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7b89fc2b77c44af491ea570db4653e3c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1743-0003
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T18:15:19Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
spelling doaj.art-7b89fc2b77c44af491ea570db4653e3c2022-12-22T04:09:56ZengBMCJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation1743-00032022-01-011911910.1186/s12984-021-00961-wComparative effects of EMG-driven robot-assisted therapy versus task-oriented training on motor and daily function in patients with stroke: a randomized cross-over trialYen-Wei Chen0Wei-Chi Chiang1Chia-Ling Chang2Shih-Ming Lo3Ching-Yi Wu4Department of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Occupational Therapy, I-Shou UniversityChang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei BranchChang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei BranchDepartment of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityAbstract Background Robot-assisted hand training has shown positive effects on promoting neuromuscular control. Since both robot-assisted therapy and task-oriented training are often used in post-stroke rehabilitation, we raised the question of whether two interventions engender differential effects in different domains. Methods The study was conducted using a randomized, two-period crossover design. Twenty-four chronic stroke survivors received a 12-session robot-assisted intervention followed by a 12-session task-oriented intervention or vice versa. A 1-month washout period between each intervention was implemented. Outcome measures were evaluated before the intervention, after the first 12-session intervention, and after the second 12-session intervention. Clinical assessments included Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity, Wolf Motor Function Test, Action Research Arm Test and Motor Activity Log. Results Our findings suggested that EMG-driven robot-assisted therapy was as effective as task-oriented training in terms of improving upper limbs functional performance in activity domain, and robot-assisted therapy was more effective in improving movement duration during functional tasks. Task-oriented training showed better improvement in body function domain and activity and participation domain, especially in improving spontaneous use of affected arm during daily activities. Conclusions Both intervention protocol had their own advantages in different domains, and robot-assisted therapy may save manpower and be considered as an alternative intervention to task-oriented training. Combining the two approaches could yield results greater than either alone, which awaits further study. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03624153. Registered on 9th August 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03624153 .https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00961-wStrokeRobot-assisted therapyUpper extremityRehabilitation
spellingShingle Yen-Wei Chen
Wei-Chi Chiang
Chia-Ling Chang
Shih-Ming Lo
Ching-Yi Wu
Comparative effects of EMG-driven robot-assisted therapy versus task-oriented training on motor and daily function in patients with stroke: a randomized cross-over trial
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Stroke
Robot-assisted therapy
Upper extremity
Rehabilitation
title Comparative effects of EMG-driven robot-assisted therapy versus task-oriented training on motor and daily function in patients with stroke: a randomized cross-over trial
title_full Comparative effects of EMG-driven robot-assisted therapy versus task-oriented training on motor and daily function in patients with stroke: a randomized cross-over trial
title_fullStr Comparative effects of EMG-driven robot-assisted therapy versus task-oriented training on motor and daily function in patients with stroke: a randomized cross-over trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effects of EMG-driven robot-assisted therapy versus task-oriented training on motor and daily function in patients with stroke: a randomized cross-over trial
title_short Comparative effects of EMG-driven robot-assisted therapy versus task-oriented training on motor and daily function in patients with stroke: a randomized cross-over trial
title_sort comparative effects of emg driven robot assisted therapy versus task oriented training on motor and daily function in patients with stroke a randomized cross over trial
topic Stroke
Robot-assisted therapy
Upper extremity
Rehabilitation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00961-w
work_keys_str_mv AT yenweichen comparativeeffectsofemgdrivenrobotassistedtherapyversustaskorientedtrainingonmotoranddailyfunctioninpatientswithstrokearandomizedcrossovertrial
AT weichichiang comparativeeffectsofemgdrivenrobotassistedtherapyversustaskorientedtrainingonmotoranddailyfunctioninpatientswithstrokearandomizedcrossovertrial
AT chialingchang comparativeeffectsofemgdrivenrobotassistedtherapyversustaskorientedtrainingonmotoranddailyfunctioninpatientswithstrokearandomizedcrossovertrial
AT shihminglo comparativeeffectsofemgdrivenrobotassistedtherapyversustaskorientedtrainingonmotoranddailyfunctioninpatientswithstrokearandomizedcrossovertrial
AT chingyiwu comparativeeffectsofemgdrivenrobotassistedtherapyversustaskorientedtrainingonmotoranddailyfunctioninpatientswithstrokearandomizedcrossovertrial