A comprehensive evaluation of cervical spine surgery outcomes
<p>Aim: study of diagnostic value of different assessment scales to evaluate outcomes of surgeries in degenerative and post-injury deformities of cervical spine. Material and Methods. Between January and December 2015, 110 consecutive patients with degenerative and traumatic lesions of cervica...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Saratov State Medical University
2017-06-01
|
| Series: | Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ssmj.ru/system/files/2017_02_266-273.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818571335789445120 |
|---|---|
| author | Ostrovsky W Schanitsyn IN Bajanov SP Fedonnikov AS. |
| author_facet | Ostrovsky W Schanitsyn IN Bajanov SP Fedonnikov AS. |
| author_sort | Ostrovsky W |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Aim: study of diagnostic value of different assessment scales to evaluate outcomes of surgeries in degenerative and post-injury deformities of cervical spine. Material and Methods. Between January and December 2015, 110 consecutive patients with degenerative and traumatic lesions of cervical spine were selected for surgery and results of treatment were followed. Preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively the patients filled in a questionnaire that included a VAS, Odom's scale, NDI, modified JOAand the Zung Depression Scale. To assess the results of the intervention, the concept of "effect size" was used. Distribution of different scores classified according to Odom's criteria as excellent/good and fair/poor. Results. All scores improved in all group of patients. For VAS, NDI and modified JOA scores the effect size was largest. NDI, JOAand ZDS seemed to correlate well with the classification of outcome by Odom. Conclusion. It is suggested many scales to assess the outcomes of the cervical spine surgery based on different criteria; nevertheless, there are no generally accepted and validated methods that can be used to analysis the outcome of cervical spine surgery. We conclude that investigated</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T13:54:21Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7b9afa36d22c47d9bcb9fe0bdbf557f8 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2076-2518 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T13:54:21Z |
| publishDate | 2017-06-01 |
| publisher | Saratov State Medical University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал |
| spelling | doaj.art-7b9afa36d22c47d9bcb9fe0bdbf557f82022-12-21T22:58:52ZrusSaratov State Medical UniversityСаратовский научно-медицинский журнал2076-25182017-06-011322662734657A comprehensive evaluation of cervical spine surgery outcomesOstrovsky W0Schanitsyn IN1Bajanov SP2Fedonnikov AS.3Saratov State Medical UniversitySaratov State Medical UniversitySaratov State Medical UniversitySaratov State Medical University<p>Aim: study of diagnostic value of different assessment scales to evaluate outcomes of surgeries in degenerative and post-injury deformities of cervical spine. Material and Methods. Between January and December 2015, 110 consecutive patients with degenerative and traumatic lesions of cervical spine were selected for surgery and results of treatment were followed. Preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively the patients filled in a questionnaire that included a VAS, Odom's scale, NDI, modified JOAand the Zung Depression Scale. To assess the results of the intervention, the concept of "effect size" was used. Distribution of different scores classified according to Odom's criteria as excellent/good and fair/poor. Results. All scores improved in all group of patients. For VAS, NDI and modified JOA scores the effect size was largest. NDI, JOAand ZDS seemed to correlate well with the classification of outcome by Odom. Conclusion. It is suggested many scales to assess the outcomes of the cervical spine surgery based on different criteria; nevertheless, there are no generally accepted and validated methods that can be used to analysis the outcome of cervical spine surgery. We conclude that investigated</p>http://www.ssmj.ru/system/files/2017_02_266-273.pdfcervical spinemyelopathyoutcome scoresradiculopathysurgical treatment |
| spellingShingle | Ostrovsky W Schanitsyn IN Bajanov SP Fedonnikov AS. A comprehensive evaluation of cervical spine surgery outcomes Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал cervical spine myelopathy outcome scores radiculopathy surgical treatment |
| title | A comprehensive evaluation of cervical spine surgery outcomes |
| title_full | A comprehensive evaluation of cervical spine surgery outcomes |
| title_fullStr | A comprehensive evaluation of cervical spine surgery outcomes |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comprehensive evaluation of cervical spine surgery outcomes |
| title_short | A comprehensive evaluation of cervical spine surgery outcomes |
| title_sort | comprehensive evaluation of cervical spine surgery outcomes |
| topic | cervical spine myelopathy outcome scores radiculopathy surgical treatment |
| url | http://www.ssmj.ru/system/files/2017_02_266-273.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ostrovskyw acomprehensiveevaluationofcervicalspinesurgeryoutcomes AT schanitsynin acomprehensiveevaluationofcervicalspinesurgeryoutcomes AT bajanovsp acomprehensiveevaluationofcervicalspinesurgeryoutcomes AT fedonnikovas acomprehensiveevaluationofcervicalspinesurgeryoutcomes AT ostrovskyw comprehensiveevaluationofcervicalspinesurgeryoutcomes AT schanitsynin comprehensiveevaluationofcervicalspinesurgeryoutcomes AT bajanovsp comprehensiveevaluationofcervicalspinesurgeryoutcomes AT fedonnikovas comprehensiveevaluationofcervicalspinesurgeryoutcomes |