The Importance of the Discussion About the Legal Nature of Possession

The article considers different views on the legal nature of possession, defines the meaning of the discussion on this matter. A historical and comparative analysis of the problems of possession protection in Russia and in foreign countries is carried out. Special attention is paid to the question o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Igor V. Popov, Veronica V. Butina
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Omsk Law Academy 2016-12-01
Series:Сибирское юридическое обозрение
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/556
_version_ 1797261105739857920
author Igor V. Popov
Veronica V. Butina
author_facet Igor V. Popov
Veronica V. Butina
author_sort Igor V. Popov
collection DOAJ
description The article considers different views on the legal nature of possession, defines the meaning of the discussion on this matter. A historical and comparative analysis of the problems of possession protection in Russia and in foreign countries is carried out. Special attention is paid to the question of indirect (double) possession. After analyzing upcoming changes in the legal regulation of property relations, the Authors express their opinion on expediency of introduction of the institution of possessory protection in the modern Russian civil legislation.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T00:59:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7b9e30d71c304815aaef1fe6dae68708
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2658-7602
2658-7610
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-24T23:35:56Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Omsk Law Academy
record_format Article
series Сибирское юридическое обозрение
spelling doaj.art-7b9e30d71c304815aaef1fe6dae687082024-03-15T14:13:29ZrusOmsk Law AcademyСибирское юридическое обозрение2658-76022658-76102016-12-0104112110.19073/2306-1340-2016-4-11-21528The Importance of the Discussion About the Legal Nature of PossessionIgor V. Popov0Veronica V. Butina1Omsk Law AcademyLLC “Eldors”The article considers different views on the legal nature of possession, defines the meaning of the discussion on this matter. A historical and comparative analysis of the problems of possession protection in Russia and in foreign countries is carried out. Special attention is paid to the question of indirect (double) possession. After analyzing upcoming changes in the legal regulation of property relations, the Authors express their opinion on expediency of introduction of the institution of possessory protection in the modern Russian civil legislation.https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/556владениеюридическая природа владенияопосредованное владениевладельческая защитаpossessionlegal nature of possessionindirect possessionpossessory protection
spellingShingle Igor V. Popov
Veronica V. Butina
The Importance of the Discussion About the Legal Nature of Possession
Сибирское юридическое обозрение
владение
юридическая природа владения
опосредованное владение
владельческая защита
possession
legal nature of possession
indirect possession
possessory protection
title The Importance of the Discussion About the Legal Nature of Possession
title_full The Importance of the Discussion About the Legal Nature of Possession
title_fullStr The Importance of the Discussion About the Legal Nature of Possession
title_full_unstemmed The Importance of the Discussion About the Legal Nature of Possession
title_short The Importance of the Discussion About the Legal Nature of Possession
title_sort importance of the discussion about the legal nature of possession
topic владение
юридическая природа владения
опосредованное владение
владельческая защита
possession
legal nature of possession
indirect possession
possessory protection
url https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/556
work_keys_str_mv AT igorvpopov theimportanceofthediscussionaboutthelegalnatureofpossession
AT veronicavbutina theimportanceofthediscussionaboutthelegalnatureofpossession
AT igorvpopov importanceofthediscussionaboutthelegalnatureofpossession
AT veronicavbutina importanceofthediscussionaboutthelegalnatureofpossession