Bayesian decision-making under stress-preserved weighting of prior and likelihood information

Abstract A rich body of empirical work has addressed the question of how stress changes the way we memorize, learn, and make high-level decisions in complex scenarios. There is evidence that stress also changes the way we perceive the world, indicating influences on decision-making at lower levels....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabrina Trapp, Iris Vilares
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2020-12-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76493-5
_version_ 1818850974842748928
author Sabrina Trapp
Iris Vilares
author_facet Sabrina Trapp
Iris Vilares
author_sort Sabrina Trapp
collection DOAJ
description Abstract A rich body of empirical work has addressed the question of how stress changes the way we memorize, learn, and make high-level decisions in complex scenarios. There is evidence that stress also changes the way we perceive the world, indicating influences on decision-making at lower levels. Surprisingly, as of yet, little research has been conducted in this domain. A few studies suggest that under stress, humans tend to eschew existing knowledge, and instead focus on novel input or information from bottom-up. Decision-making in the perceptual domain has been modeled with Bayesian frameworks. Here, existing knowledge about structures and statistics of our environment is referred to as prior, whereas sensory data are termed likelihood. In this study, we directly assessed whether stress, as induced by the socially evaluated cold pressure task (SECPT), would modulate low-level decisions, specifically the weight given to sensory information, and how people reacted to changes in prior and sensory uncertainty. We found that while the stress-inducing procedure successfully elicited subjective stress ratings as well as stress relevant physiological paramters, it did not change participants’ average reliance on sensory information. Furthermore, it did not affect participants’ sensitivity to changes in prior and sensory uncertainty, with both groups able to detect it and modulate their behavior accordingly, in a way predicted by Bayesian statistics. Our results suggest that, contrary to our predictions, stress may not directly affect lower-level sensory-motor decisions. We discuss the findings in context of time scales of the stress reaction, linked to different neural and functional consequences.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T06:57:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7ba0ab0f234d463b9c264b7978fbcdb5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T06:57:40Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-7ba0ab0f234d463b9c264b7978fbcdb52022-12-21T20:31:30ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222020-12-0110111110.1038/s41598-020-76493-5Bayesian decision-making under stress-preserved weighting of prior and likelihood informationSabrina Trapp0Iris Vilares1Department of Psychology, University of HamburgDepartment of Psychology, University of MinnesotaAbstract A rich body of empirical work has addressed the question of how stress changes the way we memorize, learn, and make high-level decisions in complex scenarios. There is evidence that stress also changes the way we perceive the world, indicating influences on decision-making at lower levels. Surprisingly, as of yet, little research has been conducted in this domain. A few studies suggest that under stress, humans tend to eschew existing knowledge, and instead focus on novel input or information from bottom-up. Decision-making in the perceptual domain has been modeled with Bayesian frameworks. Here, existing knowledge about structures and statistics of our environment is referred to as prior, whereas sensory data are termed likelihood. In this study, we directly assessed whether stress, as induced by the socially evaluated cold pressure task (SECPT), would modulate low-level decisions, specifically the weight given to sensory information, and how people reacted to changes in prior and sensory uncertainty. We found that while the stress-inducing procedure successfully elicited subjective stress ratings as well as stress relevant physiological paramters, it did not change participants’ average reliance on sensory information. Furthermore, it did not affect participants’ sensitivity to changes in prior and sensory uncertainty, with both groups able to detect it and modulate their behavior accordingly, in a way predicted by Bayesian statistics. Our results suggest that, contrary to our predictions, stress may not directly affect lower-level sensory-motor decisions. We discuss the findings in context of time scales of the stress reaction, linked to different neural and functional consequences.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76493-5
spellingShingle Sabrina Trapp
Iris Vilares
Bayesian decision-making under stress-preserved weighting of prior and likelihood information
Scientific Reports
title Bayesian decision-making under stress-preserved weighting of prior and likelihood information
title_full Bayesian decision-making under stress-preserved weighting of prior and likelihood information
title_fullStr Bayesian decision-making under stress-preserved weighting of prior and likelihood information
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian decision-making under stress-preserved weighting of prior and likelihood information
title_short Bayesian decision-making under stress-preserved weighting of prior and likelihood information
title_sort bayesian decision making under stress preserved weighting of prior and likelihood information
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76493-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sabrinatrapp bayesiandecisionmakingunderstresspreservedweightingofpriorandlikelihoodinformation
AT irisvilares bayesiandecisionmakingunderstresspreservedweightingofpriorandlikelihoodinformation