Increasing the Reproducibility of Science through Close Cooperation and Forking Path Analysis

Increasing the Reproducibility of Science through Close Cooperation and Forking Path Analysis

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Jan Wacker
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-01
Series:	Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:	reproducibility replication researcher degrees of freedom scientific practice false positives statistical power
Online Access:	http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01332/full

Similar Items

The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of p-values
by: David Colquhoun
Published: (2017-01-01)

Is preclinical research in cancer biology reproducible enough?
by: Patrick Bodilly Kane, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)

Reproducibility of Psychological Experiments as a Problem of Post-Nonclassical Science
by: Vachkov I.V.,, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01)

The trustworthiness of the cumulative knowledge in industrial/organizational psychology: The current state of affairs and a path forward
by: Sheila K. Keener, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Statistical Misconceptions, Awareness, and Attitudes towards Open Science Practices in Slovak Psychology Researchers
by: Jakub Rajčáni, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

A path to next-generation reproducibility in cheminformatics
by: Robert D. Clark
Published: (2019-10-01)

Sharing the Recipe: Reproducibility and Replicability in Research Across Disciplines
by: Rima-Maria Rahal, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

The logical structure of experiments lays the foundation for a theory of reproducibility
by: Erkan O. Buzbas, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

The reproducibility debate is an opportunity, not a crisis
by: Marcus R. Munafò, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01)

A Short Introduction to the Reproducibility Debate in Psychology
by: Cedric Galetzka
Published: (2019-05-01)

Statistical heartburn: an attempt to digest four pizza publications from the Cornell Food and Brand Lab
by: Tim van der Zee, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01)

Teaching Computational Reproducibility for Neuroimaging
by: K. Jarrod Millman, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01)

Two years into the Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative: reflections on conducting a large-scale replication of Brazilian biomedical science
by: Kleber Neves, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Reproducibility and Replicability in SAR Remote Sensing
by: Timo Balz, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

A Case for Reproducibility in MIR: Replication of ‘A Highly Robust Audio Fingerprinting System’
by: Joren Six, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Rigor and reproducibility instruction in academic medical libraries
by: Fred Willie Zametkin LaPolla, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
by: Timothy M Errington, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01)

Owning your mistakes
by: Eve Marder
Published: (2015-10-01)

Replication and the Establishment of Scientific Truth
by: Seppo E. Iso-Ahola
Published: (2020-09-01)

Reproducibility in Psychological Science: When Do Psychological Phenomena Exist?
by: Seppo E. Iso-Ahola
Published: (2017-06-01)

Quantity Over Quality? Reproducible Psychological Science from a Mixed Methods Perspective
by: Hollen N. Reischer, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)

Re-run, Repeat, Reproduce, Reuse, Replicate: Transforming Code into Scientific Contributions
by: Fabien C. Y. Benureau, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Commentary: Reproducibility in Psychological Science: When Do Psychological Phenomena Exist?
by: David Trafimow
Published: (2017-06-01)

Knowledge and Attitudes Among Life Scientists Toward Reproducibility Within Journal Articles: A Research Survey
by: Evanthia Kaimaklioti Samota, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

How to Improve the Reproducibility, Replicability, and Extensibility of Remote Sensing Research
by: Peter Kedron, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

Reproducibility literature analysis - a federal information professional perspective
by: Erin Antognoli, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Challenges in validating candidate therapeutic targets in cancer
by: Jeffrey Settleman, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)

Role of Replication Research in Biostatistics Graduate Education
by: Lynette M. Smith, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

What is useful research? The good, the bad, and the stable
by: David M. Ozonoff, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology
by: Hans E. Plesser, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative
by: Olavo B Amaral, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01)

An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values
by: David Colquhoun
Published: (2014-01-01)

Time to do something about reproducibility
by: Sean J Morrison
Published: (2014-12-01)

The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them)
by: Jelte M. Wicherts
Published: (2017-11-01)

A review of reproducible and transparent research practices in urology publications from 2014 to2018
by: Shelby Rauh, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01)

High-throughput analysis suggests differences in journal false discovery rate by subject area and impact factor but not open access status
by: L. M. Hall, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Context for Reproducibility and Replicability in Geospatial Unmanned Aircraft Systems
by: Cassandra Howe, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

Starting off strong: Rigor and reproducibility in the early career
by: Ronald J. Vagnozzi
Published: (2022-12-01)

Building capacity to encourage research reproducibility and #MakeResearchTrue
by: Melissa L. Rethlefsen, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

What senior academics can do to support reproducible and open research: a short, three-step guide
by: Olivia S. Kowalczyk, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)