The haidamaks and Koliyivshchyna in the Polish and Ukrainian historiography. The Polish-Ukrainian duet
In the article Polish and Ukrainian historians will analyze scientific achievements of researchers, who in the Polish and Ukrainian historiography occupy a prominent place as regards the haidamak movements and Koliyivshchyna, i.e. Franciszek Rawita-Gawroński, Władysław A. Serczyk, Petr Mirchuk, and...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Lodz University Press
2017-11-01
|
| Series: | Przegląd Nauk Historycznych |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/pnh/article/view/3181 |
| _version_ | 1819075491053699072 |
|---|---|
| author | Władylena W. Sokyrska Tadeusz Srogosz |
| author_facet | Władylena W. Sokyrska Tadeusz Srogosz |
| author_sort | Władylena W. Sokyrska |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In the article Polish and Ukrainian historians will analyze scientific achievements of researchers, who in the Polish and Ukrainian historiography occupy a prominent place as regards the haidamak movements and Koliyivshchyna, i.e. Franciszek Rawita-Gawroński, Władysław A. Serczyk, Petr Mirchuk, and Grigorij Hraban. Authors agree with the opinion that the historian does not judge, but tries to understand. The common Polish-Ukrainian research program on the haidamaks and Koliyivshchyna, thanks to which at least necessary queries and a discrepancy report will be developed, remains a main postulate. Only in that way the vivid use of history for current ideology and shaping of young generation will be minimized. Unfortunately, apart from substantive arguments, still there will remain other arguments of ideological or political context. The point is, however, that a discourse on Polish-Ukrainian relations in various epochs should be reduced to a normal scientific discussion that should take into account limitations resulting from cultural imputation only, the fact that has not been preserved on the part of both Ukrainian, and Polish side so far. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T18:26:15Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7ba2cce5aae347979ed318c2a936e212 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1644-857X 2450-7660 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T18:26:15Z |
| publishDate | 2017-11-01 |
| publisher | Lodz University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Przegląd Nauk Historycznych |
| spelling | doaj.art-7ba2cce5aae347979ed318c2a936e2122022-12-21T18:54:24ZengLodz University PressPrzegląd Nauk Historycznych1644-857X2450-76602017-11-0116310.18778/1644-857X.16.03.012423The haidamaks and Koliyivshchyna in the Polish and Ukrainian historiography. The Polish-Ukrainian duetWładylena W. Sokyrska0Tadeusz Srogosz1Paweł Tyczyna Pedagogical University in Uman, The Faculty of History, The Department of General History and Methodology of TeachingJan Długosz University in Częstochowa, The Faculty of Philosophy and History, The Institute of History, The Department of Methodology of History and History of HistoriographyIn the article Polish and Ukrainian historians will analyze scientific achievements of researchers, who in the Polish and Ukrainian historiography occupy a prominent place as regards the haidamak movements and Koliyivshchyna, i.e. Franciszek Rawita-Gawroński, Władysław A. Serczyk, Petr Mirchuk, and Grigorij Hraban. Authors agree with the opinion that the historian does not judge, but tries to understand. The common Polish-Ukrainian research program on the haidamaks and Koliyivshchyna, thanks to which at least necessary queries and a discrepancy report will be developed, remains a main postulate. Only in that way the vivid use of history for current ideology and shaping of young generation will be minimized. Unfortunately, apart from substantive arguments, still there will remain other arguments of ideological or political context. The point is, however, that a discourse on Polish-Ukrainian relations in various epochs should be reduced to a normal scientific discussion that should take into account limitations resulting from cultural imputation only, the fact that has not been preserved on the part of both Ukrainian, and Polish side so far.https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/pnh/article/view/3181haidamaksKoliyivshchynaPolish historiographyUkrainian historiography |
| spellingShingle | Władylena W. Sokyrska Tadeusz Srogosz The haidamaks and Koliyivshchyna in the Polish and Ukrainian historiography. The Polish-Ukrainian duet Przegląd Nauk Historycznych haidamaks Koliyivshchyna Polish historiography Ukrainian historiography |
| title | The haidamaks and Koliyivshchyna in the Polish and Ukrainian historiography. The Polish-Ukrainian duet |
| title_full | The haidamaks and Koliyivshchyna in the Polish and Ukrainian historiography. The Polish-Ukrainian duet |
| title_fullStr | The haidamaks and Koliyivshchyna in the Polish and Ukrainian historiography. The Polish-Ukrainian duet |
| title_full_unstemmed | The haidamaks and Koliyivshchyna in the Polish and Ukrainian historiography. The Polish-Ukrainian duet |
| title_short | The haidamaks and Koliyivshchyna in the Polish and Ukrainian historiography. The Polish-Ukrainian duet |
| title_sort | haidamaks and koliyivshchyna in the polish and ukrainian historiography the polish ukrainian duet |
| topic | haidamaks Koliyivshchyna Polish historiography Ukrainian historiography |
| url | https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/pnh/article/view/3181 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT władylenawsokyrska thehaidamaksandkoliyivshchynainthepolishandukrainianhistoriographythepolishukrainianduet AT tadeuszsrogosz thehaidamaksandkoliyivshchynainthepolishandukrainianhistoriographythepolishukrainianduet AT władylenawsokyrska haidamaksandkoliyivshchynainthepolishandukrainianhistoriographythepolishukrainianduet AT tadeuszsrogosz haidamaksandkoliyivshchynainthepolishandukrainianhistoriographythepolishukrainianduet |