The nature of changes in human geography since the 1980s: variation or progress?
This paper concerns the changes in human geographical research over the last 20 years as far as the mainstream Anglo-Saxon publications are concerned. We contend that although a lot of continuity appears through the further co-existence of the three broad approaches in geography (regional, theoretic...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Société Royale Belge de Géographie and the Belgian National Committee of Geography
2003-06-01
|
| Series: | Belgeo |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/16227 |
| _version_ | 1828925195655577600 |
|---|---|
| author | Christian Kesteloot Pieter Saey |
| author_facet | Christian Kesteloot Pieter Saey |
| author_sort | Christian Kesteloot |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper concerns the changes in human geographical research over the last 20 years as far as the mainstream Anglo-Saxon publications are concerned. We contend that although a lot of continuity appears through the further co-existence of the three broad approaches in geography (regional, theoretical quantitative and radical), societal and scientific changes have brought new elements into geographical practice. They can be captured with four characteristics: human geography is holographic, ethnographic, constructivist and institutionalist. The two first characteristics are metaphors of the geographical empirical stance that seeks to unveil the whole within the parts and the symbolic order behind everyday practice. The two others are more essential and point to the fact that geography now explicitly examines the socio-spatial reality as a social product shaped by and reshaping human institutions. As a result geography has made a lot of progress. It uses more relevant concepts to engage in clarifying the problems of our time, the physical environment is reintroduced in human geography as a hybrid category and the old opposition between the idiographic and nomothetic approaches is finally transcended. However, there are limits to the postmodern constructivist stance, which imply that radical geography remains a crucial component of human geography in order to explicit problems of social justice. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T23:10:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7bac7143ceb844b2a39d45d12e78d5aa |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1377-2368 2294-9135 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T23:10:39Z |
| publishDate | 2003-06-01 |
| publisher | Société Royale Belge de Géographie and the Belgian National Committee of Geography |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Belgeo |
| spelling | doaj.art-7bac7143ceb844b2a39d45d12e78d5aa2022-12-21T23:28:07ZengSociété Royale Belge de Géographie and the Belgian National Committee of GeographyBelgeo1377-23682294-91352003-06-01213114410.4000/belgeo.16227The nature of changes in human geography since the 1980s: variation or progress?Christian KestelootPieter SaeyThis paper concerns the changes in human geographical research over the last 20 years as far as the mainstream Anglo-Saxon publications are concerned. We contend that although a lot of continuity appears through the further co-existence of the three broad approaches in geography (regional, theoretical quantitative and radical), societal and scientific changes have brought new elements into geographical practice. They can be captured with four characteristics: human geography is holographic, ethnographic, constructivist and institutionalist. The two first characteristics are metaphors of the geographical empirical stance that seeks to unveil the whole within the parts and the symbolic order behind everyday practice. The two others are more essential and point to the fact that geography now explicitly examines the socio-spatial reality as a social product shaped by and reshaping human institutions. As a result geography has made a lot of progress. It uses more relevant concepts to engage in clarifying the problems of our time, the physical environment is reintroduced in human geography as a hybrid category and the old opposition between the idiographic and nomothetic approaches is finally transcended. However, there are limits to the postmodern constructivist stance, which imply that radical geography remains a crucial component of human geography in order to explicit problems of social justice.http://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/16227human geographyepistemologypostmodernism |
| spellingShingle | Christian Kesteloot Pieter Saey The nature of changes in human geography since the 1980s: variation or progress? Belgeo human geography epistemology postmodernism |
| title | The nature of changes in human geography since the 1980s: variation or progress? |
| title_full | The nature of changes in human geography since the 1980s: variation or progress? |
| title_fullStr | The nature of changes in human geography since the 1980s: variation or progress? |
| title_full_unstemmed | The nature of changes in human geography since the 1980s: variation or progress? |
| title_short | The nature of changes in human geography since the 1980s: variation or progress? |
| title_sort | nature of changes in human geography since the 1980s variation or progress |
| topic | human geography epistemology postmodernism |
| url | http://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/16227 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT christiankesteloot thenatureofchangesinhumangeographysincethe1980svariationorprogress AT pietersaey thenatureofchangesinhumangeographysincethe1980svariationorprogress AT christiankesteloot natureofchangesinhumangeographysincethe1980svariationorprogress AT pietersaey natureofchangesinhumangeographysincethe1980svariationorprogress |