A Comparison Between Subvastus and Midvastus Approaches for Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomised Study

This prospective randomised study was undertaken to compare surgical parameters as well as clinical and radiological outcomes of subvastus (SV) to midvastus (MV) approaches in staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Twenty-three patients, aged 55–76 years, who underwent staged bilateral TKAs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T Masjudin, ZH Kamari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2012-07-01
Series:Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.morthoj.org/2012/v6n2/Subvastus-and-Midvastus-Approaches.pdf
_version_ 1818675318262595584
author T Masjudin
ZH Kamari
author_facet T Masjudin
ZH Kamari
author_sort T Masjudin
collection DOAJ
description This prospective randomised study was undertaken to compare surgical parameters as well as clinical and radiological outcomes of subvastus (SV) to midvastus (MV) approaches in staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Twenty-three patients, aged 55–76 years, who underwent staged bilateral TKAs, were followed up for 6 months. The SV approach was used on one knee and MV approach on the other. We found similar lateral retinacular release rates and patellar resurfacing rates between the two approaches .The SV approached knees had a more significant blood loss and increased operative time compared to the MV approached knees but they achieved significantly earlier active straight- leg raises (SLR) postoperatively (p<0.05 for all). The average postoperative pain, flexion, and Knee Society scores were comparable for both approaches. TKA via SV vs. MV approaches provides comparable satisfactory short-term clinical and radiological outcomes, even though there was slightly more difficulty, more blood loss and longer operative times with the SV approach.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T08:25:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7bb8fcaeacfb4fb785dcee3cd0f09f54
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1985-2533
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T08:25:40Z
publishDate 2012-07-01
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
record_format Article
series Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
spelling doaj.art-7bb8fcaeacfb4fb785dcee3cd0f09f542022-12-21T21:56:47ZengMalaysian Orthopaedic AssociationMalaysian Orthopaedic Journal1985-25332012-07-01623136http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1207.018A Comparison Between Subvastus and Midvastus Approaches for Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomised StudyT Masjudin0ZH Kamari1MS OrthMS OrthThis prospective randomised study was undertaken to compare surgical parameters as well as clinical and radiological outcomes of subvastus (SV) to midvastus (MV) approaches in staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Twenty-three patients, aged 55–76 years, who underwent staged bilateral TKAs, were followed up for 6 months. The SV approach was used on one knee and MV approach on the other. We found similar lateral retinacular release rates and patellar resurfacing rates between the two approaches .The SV approached knees had a more significant blood loss and increased operative time compared to the MV approached knees but they achieved significantly earlier active straight- leg raises (SLR) postoperatively (p<0.05 for all). The average postoperative pain, flexion, and Knee Society scores were comparable for both approaches. TKA via SV vs. MV approaches provides comparable satisfactory short-term clinical and radiological outcomes, even though there was slightly more difficulty, more blood loss and longer operative times with the SV approach.http://www.morthoj.org/2012/v6n2/Subvastus-and-Midvastus-Approaches.pdfTotal knee arthroplastySubvastus approachMidvastus approach
spellingShingle T Masjudin
ZH Kamari
A Comparison Between Subvastus and Midvastus Approaches for Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomised Study
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
Total knee arthroplasty
Subvastus approach
Midvastus approach
title A Comparison Between Subvastus and Midvastus Approaches for Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomised Study
title_full A Comparison Between Subvastus and Midvastus Approaches for Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomised Study
title_fullStr A Comparison Between Subvastus and Midvastus Approaches for Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomised Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison Between Subvastus and Midvastus Approaches for Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomised Study
title_short A Comparison Between Subvastus and Midvastus Approaches for Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomised Study
title_sort comparison between subvastus and midvastus approaches for staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomised study
topic Total knee arthroplasty
Subvastus approach
Midvastus approach
url http://www.morthoj.org/2012/v6n2/Subvastus-and-Midvastus-Approaches.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tmasjudin acomparisonbetweensubvastusandmidvastusapproachesforstagedbilateraltotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT zhkamari acomparisonbetweensubvastusandmidvastusapproachesforstagedbilateraltotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT tmasjudin comparisonbetweensubvastusandmidvastusapproachesforstagedbilateraltotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT zhkamari comparisonbetweensubvastusandmidvastusapproachesforstagedbilateraltotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomisedstudy