Are complication rates lower with 4-Fr versus 6-Fr transfemoral arterial access – prospective audit at a single interventional radiology centre
Abstract Background Femoral arterial access constitutes the first step in a significant proportion of interventional endovascular procedures. Whilst existing reports describe sheath size as an independent risk factor for bleeding complications in radial arterial access for coronary intervention, the...
Main Authors: | Raymond Chung, Alex Weller, Robert Morgan, Anna-Maria Belli, Lakshmi Ratnam |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-08-01
|
Series: | CVIR Endovascular |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42155-018-0022-4 |
Similar Items
-
Comparison of Transfemoral versus Transsubclavian/Transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Waiel Abusnina, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Incidence and Risk Factors of Complications following Antegrade Common Femoral Artery Access
by: Pravin Sakharam Narkhede, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Comparison of complications after transfemoral coronary angiography between mechanical and manual closure techniques
by: Megan Bontrager, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Microperc with Self-Assembled Fr 4.85 Visual Needle and Ureteral Access Sheath
by: Jiqing Zhang, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01) -
Access Site Related Vascular Complications following Percutaneous Cardiovascular Procedures
by: Johanna Hetrodt, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)