Implantable collamer lens implantation (ICL) versus small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low to moderate myopia: study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial
Abstract Background Implantable collamer lens implantation (ICL) is a form of ‘foldable’ posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens refractive surgery that generally does not impair cornea and natural accommodation. The potential advantages of the ICL over keratorefractive laser procedures include le...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | Trials |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06851-3 |
| _version_ | 1797989834894082048 |
|---|---|
| author | Kangjun Li Zheng Wang Ming X. Wang |
| author_facet | Kangjun Li Zheng Wang Ming X. Wang |
| author_sort | Kangjun Li |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Implantable collamer lens implantation (ICL) is a form of ‘foldable’ posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens refractive surgery that generally does not impair cornea and natural accommodation. The potential advantages of the ICL over keratorefractive laser procedures include less induction of higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and enhanced retinal image magnification. On the other hand, small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), currently, one of the most popular refractive surgery procedures, also offers excellent visual outcomes, particularly for eyes with low to moderate amounts of myopia. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether ICL/TICL (toric ICL) is comparable to SMILE for low to moderate myopia in terms of refractive outcomes at 3 and 18 months post-operatively. Methods/design This is a prospective randomized study. A total of 300 participants will be randomized into two groups, the ICL/TICL group and SMILE group. Eligible participants with spherical equivalent (SE) less than − 6.0 diopter (D) will be recruited. Following randomization, participants will be followed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. The primary outcome is the refractive predictability at every postoperative point after surgery, which is the proportion of the number of eyes achieving a postoperative SE within ± 0.5 D and ± 1.0 D of the intended target. Secondary outcome parameters include visual acuity, refraction, adverse events, and quality of vision measurements. Discussion This trial will provide information on whether ICL has comparable, if not superior, refractive outcomes compared to the established SMILE for low to moderate myopia, thus providing evidence for translation into clinical practice. Trial registration Chinese clinical trial registry (ChiCTR) 2200055372. Registered on 08 January 2022. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T08:26:47Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7bd8446439924ef6855a609b49877ae3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1745-6215 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T08:26:47Z |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Trials |
| spelling | doaj.art-7bd8446439924ef6855a609b49877ae32022-12-22T04:34:43ZengBMCTrials1745-62152022-10-012311710.1186/s13063-022-06851-3Implantable collamer lens implantation (ICL) versus small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low to moderate myopia: study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trialKangjun Li0Zheng Wang1Ming X. Wang2The AIER School of Ophthalmology of Central, South University, Hunan ProvinceThe AIER School of Ophthalmology of Central, South University, Hunan ProvinceWang Vision Institute and Aier-USAAbstract Background Implantable collamer lens implantation (ICL) is a form of ‘foldable’ posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens refractive surgery that generally does not impair cornea and natural accommodation. The potential advantages of the ICL over keratorefractive laser procedures include less induction of higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and enhanced retinal image magnification. On the other hand, small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), currently, one of the most popular refractive surgery procedures, also offers excellent visual outcomes, particularly for eyes with low to moderate amounts of myopia. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether ICL/TICL (toric ICL) is comparable to SMILE for low to moderate myopia in terms of refractive outcomes at 3 and 18 months post-operatively. Methods/design This is a prospective randomized study. A total of 300 participants will be randomized into two groups, the ICL/TICL group and SMILE group. Eligible participants with spherical equivalent (SE) less than − 6.0 diopter (D) will be recruited. Following randomization, participants will be followed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. The primary outcome is the refractive predictability at every postoperative point after surgery, which is the proportion of the number of eyes achieving a postoperative SE within ± 0.5 D and ± 1.0 D of the intended target. Secondary outcome parameters include visual acuity, refraction, adverse events, and quality of vision measurements. Discussion This trial will provide information on whether ICL has comparable, if not superior, refractive outcomes compared to the established SMILE for low to moderate myopia, thus providing evidence for translation into clinical practice. Trial registration Chinese clinical trial registry (ChiCTR) 2200055372. Registered on 08 January 2022.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06851-3MyopiaRefractive surgeryImplantable collamer lens implantationSmall incision lenticule extraction |
| spellingShingle | Kangjun Li Zheng Wang Ming X. Wang Implantable collamer lens implantation (ICL) versus small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low to moderate myopia: study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial Trials Myopia Refractive surgery Implantable collamer lens implantation Small incision lenticule extraction |
| title | Implantable collamer lens implantation (ICL) versus small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low to moderate myopia: study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial |
| title_full | Implantable collamer lens implantation (ICL) versus small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low to moderate myopia: study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial |
| title_fullStr | Implantable collamer lens implantation (ICL) versus small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low to moderate myopia: study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Implantable collamer lens implantation (ICL) versus small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low to moderate myopia: study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial |
| title_short | Implantable collamer lens implantation (ICL) versus small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low to moderate myopia: study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial |
| title_sort | implantable collamer lens implantation icl versus small incision lenticule extraction smile in low to moderate myopia study protocol for a randomized non inferiority trial |
| topic | Myopia Refractive surgery Implantable collamer lens implantation Small incision lenticule extraction |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06851-3 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kangjunli implantablecollamerlensimplantationiclversussmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileinlowtomoderatemyopiastudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrial AT zhengwang implantablecollamerlensimplantationiclversussmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileinlowtomoderatemyopiastudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrial AT mingxwang implantablecollamerlensimplantationiclversussmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileinlowtomoderatemyopiastudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrial |