Differences among Science, Social Science and Humanities from the Perspective of the Scientometric Indicators of Scientific Information Institute (ISI)

Background and Aim: Data extracted from ISI databases (indexes) and the scientometric indicators are the bases of judgment on scientific influence and developments. This review article aimed at explaining possible differences in the scientometrics of sciences, social sciences and humanities based on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heidar Mokhtari, Abbas Mirzaei
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Babol University of Medical Sciences 2016-09-01
Series:مجله علم‌سنجی کاسپین
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cjs.mubabol.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-38-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1
_version_ 1797331694428094464
author Heidar Mokhtari
Abbas Mirzaei
author_facet Heidar Mokhtari
Abbas Mirzaei
author_sort Heidar Mokhtari
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aim: Data extracted from ISI databases (indexes) and the scientometric indicators are the bases of judgment on scientific influence and developments. This review article aimed at explaining possible differences in the scientometrics of sciences, social sciences and humanities based on ISI’s scientometric indicators. Material and Methods: Reanalyzing statistical data of some scientometric literature, extracting data from ISI Web of Knowledge and reviewing literature, these differences were explored in this paper. Findings: Limits of these databases in one hand and natural and inherent differences among scholarship fields and disciplines in other hand questioned the same use and similar interpretation of these indicators. Factors account to arise such differences include among others: discrepancies in ISI coverage of science, social science and humanities, different national/international orientation of ISI indexed journals in terms of different scholarship fields, disciplines and domains, variations in theatrical developments and consequent variations in citing and publishing behaviors of scholars, different publication formats and different target audience, language barriers (domination of English language in ISI indexes), tendency to one-authored publishing in some soft/qualitative fields, and citation to multiple written communication media in social science and humanities rather than in science. Conclusion: Considering the limitations of ISI scientometric indicators in evaluating all disciplines and fields, a methodology including current reformed methods in scientometrics and peer judgment is needed for achieving the best way, especially for scientometrics in qualitative fields of social science and humanities.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T07:38:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7bdb952e2647450c8865d2f4accc6410
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2383-157X
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-08T07:38:10Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Babol University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series مجله علم‌سنجی کاسپین
spelling doaj.art-7bdb952e2647450c8865d2f4accc64102024-02-02T18:04:24ZfasBabol University of Medical Sciencesمجله علم‌سنجی کاسپین2383-157X2016-09-01312329Differences among Science, Social Science and Humanities from the Perspective of the Scientometric Indicators of Scientific Information Institute (ISI)Heidar Mokhtari0Abbas Mirzaei1 Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences Background and Aim: Data extracted from ISI databases (indexes) and the scientometric indicators are the bases of judgment on scientific influence and developments. This review article aimed at explaining possible differences in the scientometrics of sciences, social sciences and humanities based on ISI’s scientometric indicators. Material and Methods: Reanalyzing statistical data of some scientometric literature, extracting data from ISI Web of Knowledge and reviewing literature, these differences were explored in this paper. Findings: Limits of these databases in one hand and natural and inherent differences among scholarship fields and disciplines in other hand questioned the same use and similar interpretation of these indicators. Factors account to arise such differences include among others: discrepancies in ISI coverage of science, social science and humanities, different national/international orientation of ISI indexed journals in terms of different scholarship fields, disciplines and domains, variations in theatrical developments and consequent variations in citing and publishing behaviors of scholars, different publication formats and different target audience, language barriers (domination of English language in ISI indexes), tendency to one-authored publishing in some soft/qualitative fields, and citation to multiple written communication media in social science and humanities rather than in science. Conclusion: Considering the limitations of ISI scientometric indicators in evaluating all disciplines and fields, a methodology including current reformed methods in scientometrics and peer judgment is needed for achieving the best way, especially for scientometrics in qualitative fields of social science and humanities.http://cjs.mubabol.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-38-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1ScienceSocial ScienceHumanitiesISIScientometrics
spellingShingle Heidar Mokhtari
Abbas Mirzaei
Differences among Science, Social Science and Humanities from the Perspective of the Scientometric Indicators of Scientific Information Institute (ISI)
مجله علم‌سنجی کاسپین
Science
Social Science
Humanities
ISI
Scientometrics
title Differences among Science, Social Science and Humanities from the Perspective of the Scientometric Indicators of Scientific Information Institute (ISI)
title_full Differences among Science, Social Science and Humanities from the Perspective of the Scientometric Indicators of Scientific Information Institute (ISI)
title_fullStr Differences among Science, Social Science and Humanities from the Perspective of the Scientometric Indicators of Scientific Information Institute (ISI)
title_full_unstemmed Differences among Science, Social Science and Humanities from the Perspective of the Scientometric Indicators of Scientific Information Institute (ISI)
title_short Differences among Science, Social Science and Humanities from the Perspective of the Scientometric Indicators of Scientific Information Institute (ISI)
title_sort differences among science social science and humanities from the perspective of the scientometric indicators of scientific information institute isi
topic Science
Social Science
Humanities
ISI
Scientometrics
url http://cjs.mubabol.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-38-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT heidarmokhtari differencesamongsciencesocialscienceandhumanitiesfromtheperspectiveofthescientometricindicatorsofscientificinformationinstituteisi
AT abbasmirzaei differencesamongsciencesocialscienceandhumanitiesfromtheperspectiveofthescientometricindicatorsofscientificinformationinstituteisi