Chemical prophylaxis and venous thromboembolism following elective spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT: Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a potentially devastating complication after surgery. Spine surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative bleeding, such as spinal epidural hematomas (SEH), which...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roman Rahmani, DO, Samuel Eaddy, MS, Samuel D. Stegelmann, MD, Gabriel Skrobot, BS, Thomas Andreshak, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-03-01
Series:North American Spine Society Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548423000975
_version_ 1797253913894715392
author Roman Rahmani, DO
Samuel Eaddy, MS
Samuel D. Stegelmann, MD
Gabriel Skrobot, BS
Thomas Andreshak, MD
author_facet Roman Rahmani, DO
Samuel Eaddy, MS
Samuel D. Stegelmann, MD
Gabriel Skrobot, BS
Thomas Andreshak, MD
author_sort Roman Rahmani, DO
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT: Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a potentially devastating complication after surgery. Spine surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative bleeding, such as spinal epidural hematomas (SEH), which complicates the use of anticoagulation. Despite this dilemma, there is a lack of consensus around perioperative VTE prophylaxis. This systematic review investigates the relationship between chemoprophylaxis and the incidence rates of VTE and SEH in the elective spine surgical population. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify studies published after 2,000 that compared VTE chemoprophylaxis use in elective spine surgery. Studies involving patients aged < 18 years or with known trauma, cancer, or spinal cord injuries were excluded. Pooled incidence rates of VTE and SEH were calculated for all eligible studies, and meta-analyses were performed to assess the relationship between chemoprophylaxis and the incidences of VTE and SEH. Results: Nineteen studies met our eligibility criteria, comprising a total of 220,932 patients. The overall pooled incidence of VTE was 3.2%, including 3.3% for DVT and 0.4% for PE. A comparison of VTE incidence between patients that did and did not receive chemoprophylaxis was not statistically significant (OR 0.97, p=.95, 95% CI 0.43–2.19). The overall pooled incidence of SEH was 0.4%, and there was also no significant difference between patients that did and did not receive chemoprophylaxis (OR 1.57, p=.06, 95% CI 0.99–2.50). Conclusions: The use of perioperative chemoprophylaxis may not significantly alter rates of VTE or SEH in the elective spine surgery population. This review highlights the need for additional randomized controlled trials to better define the risks and benefits of specific chemoprophylactic protocols in various subpopulations of elective spine surgery.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:10:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7bebb40670434d8c8e1c6ab5cb3ea939
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-5484
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T21:41:37Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series North American Spine Society Journal
spelling doaj.art-7bebb40670434d8c8e1c6ab5cb3ea9392024-03-21T05:37:47ZengElsevierNorth American Spine Society Journal2666-54842024-03-0117100295Chemical prophylaxis and venous thromboembolism following elective spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysisRoman Rahmani, DO0Samuel Eaddy, MS1Samuel D. Stegelmann, MD2Gabriel Skrobot, BS3Thomas Andreshak, MD4Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry St, Suite #10, Toledo, OH 43608, United StatesMercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry St, Suite #10, Toledo, OH 43608, United States; Corresponding author. Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry St, Suite #10, Toledo, OH 43608, USA. Tel.: (419) 251-6553, fax: (419) 251-9672.HCA Medical City Healthcare UNT-TCU GME (Denton), 3535 S Interstate 35, Denton, TX 76210, United StatesMercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry St, Suite #10, Toledo, OH 43608, United StatesMercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry St, Suite #10, Toledo, OH 43608, United StatesABSTRACT: Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a potentially devastating complication after surgery. Spine surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative bleeding, such as spinal epidural hematomas (SEH), which complicates the use of anticoagulation. Despite this dilemma, there is a lack of consensus around perioperative VTE prophylaxis. This systematic review investigates the relationship between chemoprophylaxis and the incidence rates of VTE and SEH in the elective spine surgical population. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify studies published after 2,000 that compared VTE chemoprophylaxis use in elective spine surgery. Studies involving patients aged < 18 years or with known trauma, cancer, or spinal cord injuries were excluded. Pooled incidence rates of VTE and SEH were calculated for all eligible studies, and meta-analyses were performed to assess the relationship between chemoprophylaxis and the incidences of VTE and SEH. Results: Nineteen studies met our eligibility criteria, comprising a total of 220,932 patients. The overall pooled incidence of VTE was 3.2%, including 3.3% for DVT and 0.4% for PE. A comparison of VTE incidence between patients that did and did not receive chemoprophylaxis was not statistically significant (OR 0.97, p=.95, 95% CI 0.43–2.19). The overall pooled incidence of SEH was 0.4%, and there was also no significant difference between patients that did and did not receive chemoprophylaxis (OR 1.57, p=.06, 95% CI 0.99–2.50). Conclusions: The use of perioperative chemoprophylaxis may not significantly alter rates of VTE or SEH in the elective spine surgery population. This review highlights the need for additional randomized controlled trials to better define the risks and benefits of specific chemoprophylactic protocols in various subpopulations of elective spine surgery.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548423000975ThrombosisChemoprophylaxisAnticoagulationElectiveSpine surgeryVenous thromboembolism
spellingShingle Roman Rahmani, DO
Samuel Eaddy, MS
Samuel D. Stegelmann, MD
Gabriel Skrobot, BS
Thomas Andreshak, MD
Chemical prophylaxis and venous thromboembolism following elective spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
North American Spine Society Journal
Thrombosis
Chemoprophylaxis
Anticoagulation
Elective
Spine surgery
Venous thromboembolism
title Chemical prophylaxis and venous thromboembolism following elective spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Chemical prophylaxis and venous thromboembolism following elective spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Chemical prophylaxis and venous thromboembolism following elective spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Chemical prophylaxis and venous thromboembolism following elective spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Chemical prophylaxis and venous thromboembolism following elective spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort chemical prophylaxis and venous thromboembolism following elective spinal surgery a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Thrombosis
Chemoprophylaxis
Anticoagulation
Elective
Spine surgery
Venous thromboembolism
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548423000975
work_keys_str_mv AT romanrahmanido chemicalprophylaxisandvenousthromboembolismfollowingelectivespinalsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT samueleaddyms chemicalprophylaxisandvenousthromboembolismfollowingelectivespinalsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT samueldstegelmannmd chemicalprophylaxisandvenousthromboembolismfollowingelectivespinalsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gabrielskrobotbs chemicalprophylaxisandvenousthromboembolismfollowingelectivespinalsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thomasandreshakmd chemicalprophylaxisandvenousthromboembolismfollowingelectivespinalsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis