The clinical results of bi-cruciate vs posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for flexion contracture in osteoarthritic knee

Background The improvement of flexion contracture is important in knee arthroplasty since residual flexion contracture postoperatively is associated with decreased quality of life and patient satisfaction. In this study, we investigated the effect of bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS)-type total knee arth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atsuo Inoue, Yuji Arai, Shuji Nakagawa, Yasushi Yoshihara, Masashi Kobayashi, Kenji Takahashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-10-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536231190524
_version_ 1797661853379198976
author Atsuo Inoue
Yuji Arai
Shuji Nakagawa
Yasushi Yoshihara
Masashi Kobayashi
Kenji Takahashi
author_facet Atsuo Inoue
Yuji Arai
Shuji Nakagawa
Yasushi Yoshihara
Masashi Kobayashi
Kenji Takahashi
author_sort Atsuo Inoue
collection DOAJ
description Background The improvement of flexion contracture is important in knee arthroplasty since residual flexion contracture postoperatively is associated with decreased quality of life and patient satisfaction. In this study, we investigated the effect of bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS)-type total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as compared to posterior stabilized (PS)-type TKA on osteoarthritic primary knees with flexion contractures. Methods 59 TKAs from January 2014 to December 2020, of which 30 were PS-type TKAs (NexGen LPS-flex Ⓡ ; 76.3 years, BMI 27.5) and 29 BCS-type TKAs (Journey II Ⓡ ; 72.5 years, BMI 28.6), were performed for knee osteoarthritis with preoperative flexion contracture of 15° or greater. Full extension was obtained intraoperatively during all TKAs. Clinical outcomes, radiological evaluations, and the amount of additional distal femoral osteotomy during TKA were evaluated in a retrospective study design. Results The range of motion improved in the both groups. Postoperative flexion contracture was significantly improved in the BCS group. Knee Society Score improved significantly in both groups, with no difference between the two groups. The amount of additional distal femoral osteotomy was 2.5 ± 1.3 mm for the PS group, and 1.8 ± 1.5 mm for the BCS group, showing a significant difference ( p = 0.04). Discussion The BCS-type TKA significantly improved preoperative flexion contracture and reduced the amount of additional distal femoral osteotomy compared to PS-type TKA. This is attributed to the anterior cam in the BCS-type TKA, which leads to a smaller amount of protrusion of the posterior femoral condyle from the posterior margin of the tibial component in the BCS-type in knee extension, as compared to the PS-type.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T18:51:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7becf6b5ff284ee285f48cc759030d8f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2309-4990
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T18:51:43Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-7becf6b5ff284ee285f48cc759030d8f2023-10-11T09:33:33ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902023-10-013110.1177/10225536231190524The clinical results of bi-cruciate vs posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for flexion contracture in osteoarthritic kneeAtsuo InoueYuji AraiShuji NakagawaYasushi YoshiharaMasashi KobayashiKenji TakahashiBackground The improvement of flexion contracture is important in knee arthroplasty since residual flexion contracture postoperatively is associated with decreased quality of life and patient satisfaction. In this study, we investigated the effect of bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS)-type total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as compared to posterior stabilized (PS)-type TKA on osteoarthritic primary knees with flexion contractures. Methods 59 TKAs from January 2014 to December 2020, of which 30 were PS-type TKAs (NexGen LPS-flex Ⓡ ; 76.3 years, BMI 27.5) and 29 BCS-type TKAs (Journey II Ⓡ ; 72.5 years, BMI 28.6), were performed for knee osteoarthritis with preoperative flexion contracture of 15° or greater. Full extension was obtained intraoperatively during all TKAs. Clinical outcomes, radiological evaluations, and the amount of additional distal femoral osteotomy during TKA were evaluated in a retrospective study design. Results The range of motion improved in the both groups. Postoperative flexion contracture was significantly improved in the BCS group. Knee Society Score improved significantly in both groups, with no difference between the two groups. The amount of additional distal femoral osteotomy was 2.5 ± 1.3 mm for the PS group, and 1.8 ± 1.5 mm for the BCS group, showing a significant difference ( p = 0.04). Discussion The BCS-type TKA significantly improved preoperative flexion contracture and reduced the amount of additional distal femoral osteotomy compared to PS-type TKA. This is attributed to the anterior cam in the BCS-type TKA, which leads to a smaller amount of protrusion of the posterior femoral condyle from the posterior margin of the tibial component in the BCS-type in knee extension, as compared to the PS-type.https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536231190524
spellingShingle Atsuo Inoue
Yuji Arai
Shuji Nakagawa
Yasushi Yoshihara
Masashi Kobayashi
Kenji Takahashi
The clinical results of bi-cruciate vs posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for flexion contracture in osteoarthritic knee
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
title The clinical results of bi-cruciate vs posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for flexion contracture in osteoarthritic knee
title_full The clinical results of bi-cruciate vs posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for flexion contracture in osteoarthritic knee
title_fullStr The clinical results of bi-cruciate vs posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for flexion contracture in osteoarthritic knee
title_full_unstemmed The clinical results of bi-cruciate vs posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for flexion contracture in osteoarthritic knee
title_short The clinical results of bi-cruciate vs posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for flexion contracture in osteoarthritic knee
title_sort clinical results of bi cruciate vs posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty for flexion contracture in osteoarthritic knee
url https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536231190524
work_keys_str_mv AT atsuoinoue theclinicalresultsofbicruciatevsposteriorstabilizedtotalkneearthroplastyforflexioncontractureinosteoarthriticknee
AT yujiarai theclinicalresultsofbicruciatevsposteriorstabilizedtotalkneearthroplastyforflexioncontractureinosteoarthriticknee
AT shujinakagawa theclinicalresultsofbicruciatevsposteriorstabilizedtotalkneearthroplastyforflexioncontractureinosteoarthriticknee
AT yasushiyoshihara theclinicalresultsofbicruciatevsposteriorstabilizedtotalkneearthroplastyforflexioncontractureinosteoarthriticknee
AT masashikobayashi theclinicalresultsofbicruciatevsposteriorstabilizedtotalkneearthroplastyforflexioncontractureinosteoarthriticknee
AT kenjitakahashi theclinicalresultsofbicruciatevsposteriorstabilizedtotalkneearthroplastyforflexioncontractureinosteoarthriticknee
AT atsuoinoue clinicalresultsofbicruciatevsposteriorstabilizedtotalkneearthroplastyforflexioncontractureinosteoarthriticknee
AT yujiarai clinicalresultsofbicruciatevsposteriorstabilizedtotalkneearthroplastyforflexioncontractureinosteoarthriticknee
AT shujinakagawa clinicalresultsofbicruciatevsposteriorstabilizedtotalkneearthroplastyforflexioncontractureinosteoarthriticknee
AT yasushiyoshihara clinicalresultsofbicruciatevsposteriorstabilizedtotalkneearthroplastyforflexioncontractureinosteoarthriticknee
AT masashikobayashi clinicalresultsofbicruciatevsposteriorstabilizedtotalkneearthroplastyforflexioncontractureinosteoarthriticknee
AT kenjitakahashi clinicalresultsofbicruciatevsposteriorstabilizedtotalkneearthroplastyforflexioncontractureinosteoarthriticknee