Refractive error as a risk factor in patients with Macular Telangiectasia type 2A: A case-control study

Aim: The purpose of the study was to determine the role of refractive error as a potential risk factor for macular telangiectasia (MacTel) 2A. Subjects and Methods: The study was designed as a hospital-based retrospective case–control study. One hundred and three age- and sex-matched participants se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Elias, Thushar Popat Waghule, Rameez N Hussain, Mahesh Gopalakrishnan, Giridhar Anantharaman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.kjophthal.com/article.asp?issn=0976-6677;year=2016;volume=28;issue=3;spage=189;epage=192;aulast=Elias
_version_ 1818216913193402368
author Anna Elias
Thushar Popat Waghule
Rameez N Hussain
Mahesh Gopalakrishnan
Giridhar Anantharaman
author_facet Anna Elias
Thushar Popat Waghule
Rameez N Hussain
Mahesh Gopalakrishnan
Giridhar Anantharaman
author_sort Anna Elias
collection DOAJ
description Aim: The purpose of the study was to determine the role of refractive error as a potential risk factor for macular telangiectasia (MacTel) 2A. Subjects and Methods: The study was designed as a hospital-based retrospective case–control study. One hundred and three age- and sex-matched participants served as controls. The study was conducted over a 3-year period (April 2011–March 2014). The diagnosis of MacTel 2A was based on the classification by Gass JD and Blodi BA with the addition of optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence features. Data from medical records were entered in a standardized pro forma and analyzed. Spherical equivalent (SEq) was calculated using the spherical dioptric power plus half the cylindrical dioptric power. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20 and statistical package R 1386 3.1.0. Results: The mean refractive error (SEq) of the cases was +0.90D and +1.08D among the controls. The refractive errors ranged from −4.00D to +6.75D among the cases. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the role of refractive error as a risk factor for MacTel 2A. Emmetropia was taken as the reference category. Hypermetropia had an odds ratio (OR) of 2.50 (P = 0.002). Myopia had an OR of 1.50 (P = 0.29). It was inferred that patients with hypermetropia had a 2.50 times higher risk of developing MacTel 2A, compared to emmetropes. Conclusion: Our study of 103 cases and an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls revealed that hypermetropia was a significant risk factor for the development of MacTel 2A.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T06:59:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7bef578373ca490b9eea7404b6715720
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0976-6677
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T06:59:31Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-7bef578373ca490b9eea7404b67157202022-12-22T00:33:53ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsKerala Journal of Ophthalmology0976-66772016-01-0128318919210.4103/kjo.kjo_13_17Refractive error as a risk factor in patients with Macular Telangiectasia type 2A: A case-control studyAnna EliasThushar Popat WaghuleRameez N HussainMahesh GopalakrishnanGiridhar AnantharamanAim: The purpose of the study was to determine the role of refractive error as a potential risk factor for macular telangiectasia (MacTel) 2A. Subjects and Methods: The study was designed as a hospital-based retrospective case–control study. One hundred and three age- and sex-matched participants served as controls. The study was conducted over a 3-year period (April 2011–March 2014). The diagnosis of MacTel 2A was based on the classification by Gass JD and Blodi BA with the addition of optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence features. Data from medical records were entered in a standardized pro forma and analyzed. Spherical equivalent (SEq) was calculated using the spherical dioptric power plus half the cylindrical dioptric power. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20 and statistical package R 1386 3.1.0. Results: The mean refractive error (SEq) of the cases was +0.90D and +1.08D among the controls. The refractive errors ranged from −4.00D to +6.75D among the cases. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the role of refractive error as a risk factor for MacTel 2A. Emmetropia was taken as the reference category. Hypermetropia had an odds ratio (OR) of 2.50 (P = 0.002). Myopia had an OR of 1.50 (P = 0.29). It was inferred that patients with hypermetropia had a 2.50 times higher risk of developing MacTel 2A, compared to emmetropes. Conclusion: Our study of 103 cases and an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls revealed that hypermetropia was a significant risk factor for the development of MacTel 2A.http://www.kjophthal.com/article.asp?issn=0976-6677;year=2016;volume=28;issue=3;spage=189;epage=192;aulast=EliasFundus autofluorescenceMacTel 2Arefractive errorrisk factorsSPSS
spellingShingle Anna Elias
Thushar Popat Waghule
Rameez N Hussain
Mahesh Gopalakrishnan
Giridhar Anantharaman
Refractive error as a risk factor in patients with Macular Telangiectasia type 2A: A case-control study
Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology
Fundus autofluorescence
MacTel 2A
refractive error
risk factors
SPSS
title Refractive error as a risk factor in patients with Macular Telangiectasia type 2A: A case-control study
title_full Refractive error as a risk factor in patients with Macular Telangiectasia type 2A: A case-control study
title_fullStr Refractive error as a risk factor in patients with Macular Telangiectasia type 2A: A case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Refractive error as a risk factor in patients with Macular Telangiectasia type 2A: A case-control study
title_short Refractive error as a risk factor in patients with Macular Telangiectasia type 2A: A case-control study
title_sort refractive error as a risk factor in patients with macular telangiectasia type 2a a case control study
topic Fundus autofluorescence
MacTel 2A
refractive error
risk factors
SPSS
url http://www.kjophthal.com/article.asp?issn=0976-6677;year=2016;volume=28;issue=3;spage=189;epage=192;aulast=Elias
work_keys_str_mv AT annaelias refractiveerrorasariskfactorinpatientswithmaculartelangiectasiatype2aacasecontrolstudy
AT thusharpopatwaghule refractiveerrorasariskfactorinpatientswithmaculartelangiectasiatype2aacasecontrolstudy
AT rameeznhussain refractiveerrorasariskfactorinpatientswithmaculartelangiectasiatype2aacasecontrolstudy
AT maheshgopalakrishnan refractiveerrorasariskfactorinpatientswithmaculartelangiectasiatype2aacasecontrolstudy
AT giridharanantharaman refractiveerrorasariskfactorinpatientswithmaculartelangiectasiatype2aacasecontrolstudy