Effects of dimensionality on the performance of hydrodynamic models for stratified lakes and reservoirs

<p>Numerical models are an important tool for simulating temperature, hydrodynamics, and water quality in lakes and reservoirs. Existing models differ in dimensionality by considering spatial variations of simulated parameters (e.g., flow velocity and water temperature) in one (1D), two (2D) o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Ishikawa, W. Gonzalez, O. Golyjeswski, G. Sales, J. A. Rigotti, T. Bleninger, M. Mannich, A. Lorke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-03-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/2197/2022/gmd-15-2197-2022.pdf
_version_ 1818288527199174656
author M. Ishikawa
W. Gonzalez
O. Golyjeswski
G. Sales
J. A. Rigotti
T. Bleninger
M. Mannich
A. Lorke
author_facet M. Ishikawa
W. Gonzalez
O. Golyjeswski
G. Sales
J. A. Rigotti
T. Bleninger
M. Mannich
A. Lorke
author_sort M. Ishikawa
collection DOAJ
description <p>Numerical models are an important tool for simulating temperature, hydrodynamics, and water quality in lakes and reservoirs. Existing models differ in dimensionality by considering spatial variations of simulated parameters (e.g., flow velocity and water temperature) in one (1D), two (2D) or three (3D) spatial dimensions. The different approaches are based on different levels of simplification in the description of hydrodynamic processes and result in different demands on computational power. The aim of this study is to compare three models with different dimensionalities and to analyze differences between model results in relation to model simplifications. We analyze simulations of thermal stratification, flow velocity and substance transport by density currents in a medium-sized drinking-water reservoir in the subtropical zone, using three widely used open-source models: GLM (1D), CE-QUAL-W2 (2D) and Delft3D (3D). The models were operated with identical initial and boundary conditions over a 1-year period. Their performance was assessed by comparing model results with measurements of temperature, flow velocity and turbulence. Our results show that all models were capable of simulating the seasonal changes in water temperature and stratification. Flow velocities, only available for the 2D and 3D approaches, were more challenging to reproduce, but 3D simulations showed closer agreement with observations. With increasing dimensionality, the quality of the simulations also increased in terms of error, correlation and variance. None of the models provided good agreement with observations in terms of mixed layer depth, which also affects the spreading of inflowing water as density currents and the results of water quality models that build on outputs of the hydrodynamic models.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-13T01:57:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7bf3f6869abc4043958c77711e47f8a7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T01:57:48Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Geoscientific Model Development
spelling doaj.art-7bf3f6869abc4043958c77711e47f8a72022-12-22T00:03:20ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032022-03-01152197222010.5194/gmd-15-2197-2022Effects of dimensionality on the performance of hydrodynamic models for stratified lakes and reservoirsM. Ishikawa0W. Gonzalez1O. Golyjeswski2G. Sales3J. A. Rigotti4T. Bleninger5M. Mannich6A. Lorke7Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz – Landau, Landau, 76829, GermanyInstitute for Water and River Basin Management, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, 76131, GermanyGraduate Program in Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, 82590-300, BrazilGraduate Program in Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, 82590-300, BrazilGraduate Program in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, 81531-990, BrazilDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, 82590-300, BrazilDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, 82590-300, BrazilInstitute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz – Landau, Landau, 76829, Germany<p>Numerical models are an important tool for simulating temperature, hydrodynamics, and water quality in lakes and reservoirs. Existing models differ in dimensionality by considering spatial variations of simulated parameters (e.g., flow velocity and water temperature) in one (1D), two (2D) or three (3D) spatial dimensions. The different approaches are based on different levels of simplification in the description of hydrodynamic processes and result in different demands on computational power. The aim of this study is to compare three models with different dimensionalities and to analyze differences between model results in relation to model simplifications. We analyze simulations of thermal stratification, flow velocity and substance transport by density currents in a medium-sized drinking-water reservoir in the subtropical zone, using three widely used open-source models: GLM (1D), CE-QUAL-W2 (2D) and Delft3D (3D). The models were operated with identical initial and boundary conditions over a 1-year period. Their performance was assessed by comparing model results with measurements of temperature, flow velocity and turbulence. Our results show that all models were capable of simulating the seasonal changes in water temperature and stratification. Flow velocities, only available for the 2D and 3D approaches, were more challenging to reproduce, but 3D simulations showed closer agreement with observations. With increasing dimensionality, the quality of the simulations also increased in terms of error, correlation and variance. None of the models provided good agreement with observations in terms of mixed layer depth, which also affects the spreading of inflowing water as density currents and the results of water quality models that build on outputs of the hydrodynamic models.</p>https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/2197/2022/gmd-15-2197-2022.pdf
spellingShingle M. Ishikawa
W. Gonzalez
O. Golyjeswski
G. Sales
J. A. Rigotti
T. Bleninger
M. Mannich
A. Lorke
Effects of dimensionality on the performance of hydrodynamic models for stratified lakes and reservoirs
Geoscientific Model Development
title Effects of dimensionality on the performance of hydrodynamic models for stratified lakes and reservoirs
title_full Effects of dimensionality on the performance of hydrodynamic models for stratified lakes and reservoirs
title_fullStr Effects of dimensionality on the performance of hydrodynamic models for stratified lakes and reservoirs
title_full_unstemmed Effects of dimensionality on the performance of hydrodynamic models for stratified lakes and reservoirs
title_short Effects of dimensionality on the performance of hydrodynamic models for stratified lakes and reservoirs
title_sort effects of dimensionality on the performance of hydrodynamic models for stratified lakes and reservoirs
url https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/2197/2022/gmd-15-2197-2022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mishikawa effectsofdimensionalityontheperformanceofhydrodynamicmodelsforstratifiedlakesandreservoirs
AT wgonzalez effectsofdimensionalityontheperformanceofhydrodynamicmodelsforstratifiedlakesandreservoirs
AT ogolyjeswski effectsofdimensionalityontheperformanceofhydrodynamicmodelsforstratifiedlakesandreservoirs
AT gsales effectsofdimensionalityontheperformanceofhydrodynamicmodelsforstratifiedlakesandreservoirs
AT jarigotti effectsofdimensionalityontheperformanceofhydrodynamicmodelsforstratifiedlakesandreservoirs
AT tbleninger effectsofdimensionalityontheperformanceofhydrodynamicmodelsforstratifiedlakesandreservoirs
AT mmannich effectsofdimensionalityontheperformanceofhydrodynamicmodelsforstratifiedlakesandreservoirs
AT alorke effectsofdimensionalityontheperformanceofhydrodynamicmodelsforstratifiedlakesandreservoirs