Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to a combination of pomegranate pomace extract and greater galangal rhizome powder and an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006
Abstract Following an application from Nerthus ApS, submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of Denmark, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2015-05-01
|
| Series: | EFSA Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4097 |
| _version_ | 1819095068816965632 |
|---|---|
| author | EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) |
| author_facet | EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) |
| author_sort | EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Following an application from Nerthus ApS, submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of Denmark, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to a combination of pomegranate pomace extract (standardised by its content of punicalagins) and greater galangal rhizome powder (standardised by its content of acetoxychavicol acetate) and an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen. The Panel considers that the food is sufficiently characterised. An increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen is a beneficial physiological effect. In weighing the evidence, the Panel took into account that one human study showed an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen when the combination of pomegranate pomace extract and greater galangal rhizome powder was consumed for three months, that no other human studies in which these results have been replicated were provided, and that no evidence was provided for a mechanism by which the food could exert the claimed effect. The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of the combination of pomegranate pomace extract (standardised by its content of punicalagins) and greater galangal rhizome powder (standardised by its content of acetoxychavicol acetate) and an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T23:37:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7bf8b8790b2140828528fa6c0b652f51 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1831-4732 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T23:37:26Z |
| publishDate | 2015-05-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | EFSA Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-7bf8b8790b2140828528fa6c0b652f512022-12-21T18:46:19ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322015-05-01135n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4097Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to a combination of pomegranate pomace extract and greater galangal rhizome powder and an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)Abstract Following an application from Nerthus ApS, submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of Denmark, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to a combination of pomegranate pomace extract (standardised by its content of punicalagins) and greater galangal rhizome powder (standardised by its content of acetoxychavicol acetate) and an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen. The Panel considers that the food is sufficiently characterised. An increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen is a beneficial physiological effect. In weighing the evidence, the Panel took into account that one human study showed an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen when the combination of pomegranate pomace extract and greater galangal rhizome powder was consumed for three months, that no other human studies in which these results have been replicated were provided, and that no evidence was provided for a mechanism by which the food could exert the claimed effect. The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of the combination of pomegranate pomace extract (standardised by its content of punicalagins) and greater galangal rhizome powder (standardised by its content of acetoxychavicol acetate) and an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4097pomegranategreater galangalsemenspermatozoahealth claims |
| spellingShingle | EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to a combination of pomegranate pomace extract and greater galangal rhizome powder and an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 EFSA Journal pomegranate greater galangal semen spermatozoa health claims |
| title | Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to a combination of pomegranate pomace extract and greater galangal rhizome powder and an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 |
| title_full | Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to a combination of pomegranate pomace extract and greater galangal rhizome powder and an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 |
| title_fullStr | Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to a combination of pomegranate pomace extract and greater galangal rhizome powder and an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to a combination of pomegranate pomace extract and greater galangal rhizome powder and an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 |
| title_short | Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to a combination of pomegranate pomace extract and greater galangal rhizome powder and an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 |
| title_sort | scientific opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to a combination of pomegranate pomace extract and greater galangal rhizome powder and an increase in the number of motile spermatozoa in semen pursuant to article 13 5 of regulation ec no 1924 2006 |
| topic | pomegranate greater galangal semen spermatozoa health claims |
| url | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4097 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT efsapanelondieteticproductsnutritionandallergiesnda scientificopiniononthesubstantiationofahealthclaimrelatedtoacombinationofpomegranatepomaceextractandgreatergalangalrhizomepowderandanincreaseinthenumberofmotilespermatozoainsemenpursuanttoarticle135ofregulationecno19242006 |