Non-Intrusive Contact Respiratory Sensor for Vehicles

In this work, we propose a low-cost solution capable of collecting the driver’s respiratory signal in a robust and non-intrusive way by contact with the chest and abdomen. It consists of a microcontroller and two piezoelectric sensors with their respective 3D printed plastic housings attached to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Quentin Meteier, Michiel Kindt, Leonardo Angelini, Omar Abou Khaled, Elena Mugellini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/3/880
_version_ 1797484811976179712
author Quentin Meteier
Michiel Kindt
Leonardo Angelini
Omar Abou Khaled
Elena Mugellini
author_facet Quentin Meteier
Michiel Kindt
Leonardo Angelini
Omar Abou Khaled
Elena Mugellini
author_sort Quentin Meteier
collection DOAJ
description In this work, we propose a low-cost solution capable of collecting the driver’s respiratory signal in a robust and non-intrusive way by contact with the chest and abdomen. It consists of a microcontroller and two piezoelectric sensors with their respective 3D printed plastic housings attached to the seat belt. An iterative process was conducted to find the optimal shape of the sensor housing. The location of the sensors can be easily adapted by sliding them along the seat belt. A few participants took part in three test sessions in a driving simulator. They had to perform various activities: resting, deep breathing, manual driving, and a non-driving-related task during automated driving. The subjects’ breathing rates were calculated from raw data collected with a reference chest belt, each sensor alone, and the fusion of the two. Results indicate that respiratory rate could be assessed from a single sensor located on the chest with an average absolute error of 0.92 min<sup>−1</sup> across all periods, dropping to 0.13 min<sup>−1</sup> during deep breathing. Sensor fusion did not improve system performance. A 4-pole filter with a cutoff frequency of 1 Hz emerged as the best option to minimize the error during the different periods. The results suggest that such a system could be used to assess the driver’s breathing rate while performing various activities in a vehicle.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:09:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7c0e5f445b534cffb29e543594adc604
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:09:52Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-7c0e5f445b534cffb29e543594adc6042023-11-23T17:46:54ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202022-01-0122388010.3390/s22030880Non-Intrusive Contact Respiratory Sensor for VehiclesQuentin Meteier0Michiel Kindt1Leonardo Angelini2Omar Abou Khaled3Elena Mugellini4HumanTech Institute, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland//HES-SO, 1700 Fribourg, SwitzerlandUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts of Northwestern Switzerland//FHNW, 5210 Windisch, SwitzerlandHumanTech Institute, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland//HES-SO, 1700 Fribourg, SwitzerlandHumanTech Institute, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland//HES-SO, 1700 Fribourg, SwitzerlandHumanTech Institute, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland//HES-SO, 1700 Fribourg, SwitzerlandIn this work, we propose a low-cost solution capable of collecting the driver’s respiratory signal in a robust and non-intrusive way by contact with the chest and abdomen. It consists of a microcontroller and two piezoelectric sensors with their respective 3D printed plastic housings attached to the seat belt. An iterative process was conducted to find the optimal shape of the sensor housing. The location of the sensors can be easily adapted by sliding them along the seat belt. A few participants took part in three test sessions in a driving simulator. They had to perform various activities: resting, deep breathing, manual driving, and a non-driving-related task during automated driving. The subjects’ breathing rates were calculated from raw data collected with a reference chest belt, each sensor alone, and the fusion of the two. Results indicate that respiratory rate could be assessed from a single sensor located on the chest with an average absolute error of 0.92 min<sup>−1</sup> across all periods, dropping to 0.13 min<sup>−1</sup> during deep breathing. Sensor fusion did not improve system performance. A 4-pole filter with a cutoff frequency of 1 Hz emerged as the best option to minimize the error during the different periods. The results suggest that such a system could be used to assess the driver’s breathing rate while performing various activities in a vehicle.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/3/880contactdriver statefusionnon-intrusiverespirationsensor
spellingShingle Quentin Meteier
Michiel Kindt
Leonardo Angelini
Omar Abou Khaled
Elena Mugellini
Non-Intrusive Contact Respiratory Sensor for Vehicles
Sensors
contact
driver state
fusion
non-intrusive
respiration
sensor
title Non-Intrusive Contact Respiratory Sensor for Vehicles
title_full Non-Intrusive Contact Respiratory Sensor for Vehicles
title_fullStr Non-Intrusive Contact Respiratory Sensor for Vehicles
title_full_unstemmed Non-Intrusive Contact Respiratory Sensor for Vehicles
title_short Non-Intrusive Contact Respiratory Sensor for Vehicles
title_sort non intrusive contact respiratory sensor for vehicles
topic contact
driver state
fusion
non-intrusive
respiration
sensor
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/3/880
work_keys_str_mv AT quentinmeteier nonintrusivecontactrespiratorysensorforvehicles
AT michielkindt nonintrusivecontactrespiratorysensorforvehicles
AT leonardoangelini nonintrusivecontactrespiratorysensorforvehicles
AT omaraboukhaled nonintrusivecontactrespiratorysensorforvehicles
AT elenamugellini nonintrusivecontactrespiratorysensorforvehicles