<i>In Vitro</i> Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of EndoSeal MTA, iRoot SP, and AH Plus against Planktonic Bacteria

This study aimed to investigate the antibacterial activity of three endodontic sealers, AH Plus, iRoot SP, and EndoSeal MTA, against four planktonic bacteria species. The antibacterial activity of the three endodontic sealers was assessed using a modified direct contact test. Bacteria suspension of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siew Thong Mak, Xin Fang Leong, In Meei Tew, Endang Kumolosasi, Lishen Wong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/6/2012
_version_ 1797445812450492416
author Siew Thong Mak
Xin Fang Leong
In Meei Tew
Endang Kumolosasi
Lishen Wong
author_facet Siew Thong Mak
Xin Fang Leong
In Meei Tew
Endang Kumolosasi
Lishen Wong
author_sort Siew Thong Mak
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to investigate the antibacterial activity of three endodontic sealers, AH Plus, iRoot SP, and EndoSeal MTA, against four planktonic bacteria species. The antibacterial activity of the three endodontic sealers was assessed using a modified direct contact test. Bacteria suspension of <i>Actinomycoses viscosus, Enterococcus faecalis</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, and <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> were left in contact with the sealers that were pre-set or set for 1, 3, 7, and l4 days for an hour. Freshly mixed AH Plus and EndoSeal MTA were highly effective against all four tested bacteria as no surviving bacteria were recovered after treatment. Meanwhile, freshly mixed iRoot SP was not able to kill all bacteria, regardless of the species, demonstrating a weak antibacterial effect. After 24 h, AH Plus lost its antibacterial activity. EndoSeal MTA showed a strong and extended bactericidal effect against <i>S. aureus</i> and <i>S. mutans</i> for 3 days and <i>A. viscosus</i> for 7 days. In conclusion, fresh AH Plus and EndoSeal MTA exhibited a potent effect against all four bacteria species. EndoSeal MTA remained effective after setting when tested against <i>A. viscosus, S. aureus</i>, and <i>S. mutans</i>. Among all tested sealers, iRoot SP demonstrates the weakest antibacterial activity.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T13:31:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7c17f02964a64cbfab480f9b405e4b9e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1944
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T13:31:14Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Materials
spelling doaj.art-7c17f02964a64cbfab480f9b405e4b9e2023-11-30T21:17:27ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442022-03-01156201210.3390/ma15062012<i>In Vitro</i> Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of EndoSeal MTA, iRoot SP, and AH Plus against Planktonic BacteriaSiew Thong Mak0Xin Fang Leong1In Meei Tew2Endang Kumolosasi3Lishen Wong4Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, MalaysiaDepartment of Craniofacial Diagnostics and Biosciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, MalaysiaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, MalaysiaDrug and Herbal Research Centre, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, MalaysiaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, MalaysiaThis study aimed to investigate the antibacterial activity of three endodontic sealers, AH Plus, iRoot SP, and EndoSeal MTA, against four planktonic bacteria species. The antibacterial activity of the three endodontic sealers was assessed using a modified direct contact test. Bacteria suspension of <i>Actinomycoses viscosus, Enterococcus faecalis</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, and <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> were left in contact with the sealers that were pre-set or set for 1, 3, 7, and l4 days for an hour. Freshly mixed AH Plus and EndoSeal MTA were highly effective against all four tested bacteria as no surviving bacteria were recovered after treatment. Meanwhile, freshly mixed iRoot SP was not able to kill all bacteria, regardless of the species, demonstrating a weak antibacterial effect. After 24 h, AH Plus lost its antibacterial activity. EndoSeal MTA showed a strong and extended bactericidal effect against <i>S. aureus</i> and <i>S. mutans</i> for 3 days and <i>A. viscosus</i> for 7 days. In conclusion, fresh AH Plus and EndoSeal MTA exhibited a potent effect against all four bacteria species. EndoSeal MTA remained effective after setting when tested against <i>A. viscosus, S. aureus</i>, and <i>S. mutans</i>. Among all tested sealers, iRoot SP demonstrates the weakest antibacterial activity.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/6/2012antibacterialmodified direct contact testendodontic sealerbacteriaplanktonic
spellingShingle Siew Thong Mak
Xin Fang Leong
In Meei Tew
Endang Kumolosasi
Lishen Wong
<i>In Vitro</i> Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of EndoSeal MTA, iRoot SP, and AH Plus against Planktonic Bacteria
Materials
antibacterial
modified direct contact test
endodontic sealer
bacteria
planktonic
title <i>In Vitro</i> Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of EndoSeal MTA, iRoot SP, and AH Plus against Planktonic Bacteria
title_full <i>In Vitro</i> Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of EndoSeal MTA, iRoot SP, and AH Plus against Planktonic Bacteria
title_fullStr <i>In Vitro</i> Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of EndoSeal MTA, iRoot SP, and AH Plus against Planktonic Bacteria
title_full_unstemmed <i>In Vitro</i> Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of EndoSeal MTA, iRoot SP, and AH Plus against Planktonic Bacteria
title_short <i>In Vitro</i> Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of EndoSeal MTA, iRoot SP, and AH Plus against Planktonic Bacteria
title_sort i in vitro i evaluation of the antibacterial activity of endoseal mta iroot sp and ah plus against planktonic bacteria
topic antibacterial
modified direct contact test
endodontic sealer
bacteria
planktonic
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/6/2012
work_keys_str_mv AT siewthongmak iinvitroievaluationoftheantibacterialactivityofendosealmtairootspandahplusagainstplanktonicbacteria
AT xinfangleong iinvitroievaluationoftheantibacterialactivityofendosealmtairootspandahplusagainstplanktonicbacteria
AT inmeeitew iinvitroievaluationoftheantibacterialactivityofendosealmtairootspandahplusagainstplanktonicbacteria
AT endangkumolosasi iinvitroievaluationoftheantibacterialactivityofendosealmtairootspandahplusagainstplanktonicbacteria
AT lishenwong iinvitroievaluationoftheantibacterialactivityofendosealmtairootspandahplusagainstplanktonicbacteria