The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning

This paper is grounded in Cognitive Linguistics (CL), which sees metonymy as a conceptual phenomenon, in which one conceptual entity (the source) provides mental access to another entity (the target) within the same conceptual domain (Radden & Kövecses 1999), as opposed to metaphor, which is see...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabina Tabacaru, Kurt Feyaerts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cracow Tertium Society for the Promotion of Language Studies 2015-09-01
Series:The European Journal of Humour Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/89
_version_ 1818725960477835264
author Sabina Tabacaru
Kurt Feyaerts
author_facet Sabina Tabacaru
Kurt Feyaerts
author_sort Sabina Tabacaru
collection DOAJ
description This paper is grounded in Cognitive Linguistics (CL), which sees metonymy as a conceptual phenomenon, in which one conceptual entity (the source) provides mental access to another entity (the target) within the same conceptual domain (Radden & Kövecses 1999), as opposed to metaphor, which is seen as a mapping between different domains (Lakoff 1987). Our view on metonymy slightly deviates from the mainstream CL-approach, as we reinterpret the criterion of the single domain as an epiphenomenon of the conceptually defined contiguous relationship (Feyaerts 1999), which we take to be metonymy’s categorical feature. In this contribution, we analyse the structural role of metonymy in humorous interactional sequences as they occur in the American television-series House M.D. and The Big Bang Theory. As our examples qualify as staged communicative acts, the interpretation of which involves processing meanings on different layers, we use Clark’s (1996) layering model to account for the humorous uses of metonymies and to show that metonymic connections lie at the heart of pragmatic inferencing. In line with – and at the same time extending – earlier work (Feyaerts & Brône 2005) on the potential of metonymic chaining to generate humorous and expressive meanings, this study demonstrates how a metonymic relationship may extend across different layers of meaning – the ‘serious’ discourse base space and a ‘non-serious’ pretence space – to generate a humorous meaning, based on the common ground between the speakers and the audience.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T21:50:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7c1861c3a59a45c98dbdd68bb56f9274
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2307-700X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T21:50:37Z
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher Cracow Tertium Society for the Promotion of Language Studies
record_format Article
series The European Journal of Humour Research
spelling doaj.art-7c1861c3a59a45c98dbdd68bb56f92742022-12-21T21:31:19ZengCracow Tertium Society for the Promotion of Language StudiesThe European Journal of Humour Research2307-700X2015-09-014211810.7592/EJHR2016.4.2.tabacaru87The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaningSabina Tabacaru0Kurt Feyaerts1Université Charles de Gaulle, Lille 3 & Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenK.U.LeuvenThis paper is grounded in Cognitive Linguistics (CL), which sees metonymy as a conceptual phenomenon, in which one conceptual entity (the source) provides mental access to another entity (the target) within the same conceptual domain (Radden & Kövecses 1999), as opposed to metaphor, which is seen as a mapping between different domains (Lakoff 1987). Our view on metonymy slightly deviates from the mainstream CL-approach, as we reinterpret the criterion of the single domain as an epiphenomenon of the conceptually defined contiguous relationship (Feyaerts 1999), which we take to be metonymy’s categorical feature. In this contribution, we analyse the structural role of metonymy in humorous interactional sequences as they occur in the American television-series House M.D. and The Big Bang Theory. As our examples qualify as staged communicative acts, the interpretation of which involves processing meanings on different layers, we use Clark’s (1996) layering model to account for the humorous uses of metonymies and to show that metonymic connections lie at the heart of pragmatic inferencing. In line with – and at the same time extending – earlier work (Feyaerts & Brône 2005) on the potential of metonymic chaining to generate humorous and expressive meanings, this study demonstrates how a metonymic relationship may extend across different layers of meaning – the ‘serious’ discourse base space and a ‘non-serious’ pretence space – to generate a humorous meaning, based on the common ground between the speakers and the audience.https://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/89humourmetonymylayeringreference-pointinferencing
spellingShingle Sabina Tabacaru
Kurt Feyaerts
The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning
The European Journal of Humour Research
humour
metonymy
layering
reference-point
inferencing
title The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning
title_full The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning
title_fullStr The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning
title_full_unstemmed The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning
title_short The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning
title_sort power of metonymy in humour stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning
topic humour
metonymy
layering
reference-point
inferencing
url https://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/89
work_keys_str_mv AT sabinatabacaru thepowerofmetonymyinhumourstretchingcontiguousrelationsacrossdifferentlayersofmeaning
AT kurtfeyaerts thepowerofmetonymyinhumourstretchingcontiguousrelationsacrossdifferentlayersofmeaning
AT sabinatabacaru powerofmetonymyinhumourstretchingcontiguousrelationsacrossdifferentlayersofmeaning
AT kurtfeyaerts powerofmetonymyinhumourstretchingcontiguousrelationsacrossdifferentlayersofmeaning