The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning
This paper is grounded in Cognitive Linguistics (CL), which sees metonymy as a conceptual phenomenon, in which one conceptual entity (the source) provides mental access to another entity (the target) within the same conceptual domain (Radden & Kövecses 1999), as opposed to metaphor, which is see...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cracow Tertium Society for the Promotion of Language Studies
2015-09-01
|
Series: | The European Journal of Humour Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/89 |
_version_ | 1818725960477835264 |
---|---|
author | Sabina Tabacaru Kurt Feyaerts |
author_facet | Sabina Tabacaru Kurt Feyaerts |
author_sort | Sabina Tabacaru |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This paper is grounded in Cognitive Linguistics (CL), which sees metonymy as a conceptual phenomenon, in which one conceptual entity (the source) provides mental access to another entity (the target) within the same conceptual domain (Radden & Kövecses 1999), as opposed to metaphor, which is seen as a mapping between different domains (Lakoff 1987). Our view on metonymy slightly deviates from the mainstream CL-approach, as we reinterpret the criterion of the single domain as an epiphenomenon of the conceptually defined contiguous relationship (Feyaerts 1999), which we take to be metonymy’s categorical feature. In this contribution, we analyse the structural role of metonymy in humorous interactional sequences as they occur in the American television-series House M.D. and The Big Bang Theory. As our examples qualify as staged communicative acts, the interpretation of which involves processing meanings on different layers, we use Clark’s (1996) layering model to account for the humorous uses of metonymies and to show that metonymic connections lie at the heart of pragmatic inferencing. In line with – and at the same time extending – earlier work (Feyaerts & Brône 2005) on the potential of metonymic chaining to generate humorous and expressive meanings, this study demonstrates how a metonymic relationship may extend across different layers of meaning – the ‘serious’ discourse base space and a ‘non-serious’ pretence space – to generate a humorous meaning, based on the common ground between the speakers and the audience. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T21:50:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7c1861c3a59a45c98dbdd68bb56f9274 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2307-700X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T21:50:37Z |
publishDate | 2015-09-01 |
publisher | Cracow Tertium Society for the Promotion of Language Studies |
record_format | Article |
series | The European Journal of Humour Research |
spelling | doaj.art-7c1861c3a59a45c98dbdd68bb56f92742022-12-21T21:31:19ZengCracow Tertium Society for the Promotion of Language StudiesThe European Journal of Humour Research2307-700X2015-09-014211810.7592/EJHR2016.4.2.tabacaru87The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaningSabina Tabacaru0Kurt Feyaerts1Université Charles de Gaulle, Lille 3 & Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenK.U.LeuvenThis paper is grounded in Cognitive Linguistics (CL), which sees metonymy as a conceptual phenomenon, in which one conceptual entity (the source) provides mental access to another entity (the target) within the same conceptual domain (Radden & Kövecses 1999), as opposed to metaphor, which is seen as a mapping between different domains (Lakoff 1987). Our view on metonymy slightly deviates from the mainstream CL-approach, as we reinterpret the criterion of the single domain as an epiphenomenon of the conceptually defined contiguous relationship (Feyaerts 1999), which we take to be metonymy’s categorical feature. In this contribution, we analyse the structural role of metonymy in humorous interactional sequences as they occur in the American television-series House M.D. and The Big Bang Theory. As our examples qualify as staged communicative acts, the interpretation of which involves processing meanings on different layers, we use Clark’s (1996) layering model to account for the humorous uses of metonymies and to show that metonymic connections lie at the heart of pragmatic inferencing. In line with – and at the same time extending – earlier work (Feyaerts & Brône 2005) on the potential of metonymic chaining to generate humorous and expressive meanings, this study demonstrates how a metonymic relationship may extend across different layers of meaning – the ‘serious’ discourse base space and a ‘non-serious’ pretence space – to generate a humorous meaning, based on the common ground between the speakers and the audience.https://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/89humourmetonymylayeringreference-pointinferencing |
spellingShingle | Sabina Tabacaru Kurt Feyaerts The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning The European Journal of Humour Research humour metonymy layering reference-point inferencing |
title | The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning |
title_full | The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning |
title_fullStr | The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning |
title_full_unstemmed | The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning |
title_short | The power of metonymy in humour: stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning |
title_sort | power of metonymy in humour stretching contiguous relations across different layers of meaning |
topic | humour metonymy layering reference-point inferencing |
url | https://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/89 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sabinatabacaru thepowerofmetonymyinhumourstretchingcontiguousrelationsacrossdifferentlayersofmeaning AT kurtfeyaerts thepowerofmetonymyinhumourstretchingcontiguousrelationsacrossdifferentlayersofmeaning AT sabinatabacaru powerofmetonymyinhumourstretchingcontiguousrelationsacrossdifferentlayersofmeaning AT kurtfeyaerts powerofmetonymyinhumourstretchingcontiguousrelationsacrossdifferentlayersofmeaning |