Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal

Background. Meal ingestion induces a postprandial experience that involves homeostatic and hedonic sensations. Our aim was to determine the effect of aversive conditioning on the postprandial reward of a comfort meal. Methods: A sham-controlled, randomised, parallel, single-blind study was performed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adoracion Nieto, Dan M. Livovsky, Fernando Azpiroz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-05-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/15/10/2247
_version_ 1797598847252299776
author Adoracion Nieto
Dan M. Livovsky
Fernando Azpiroz
author_facet Adoracion Nieto
Dan M. Livovsky
Fernando Azpiroz
author_sort Adoracion Nieto
collection DOAJ
description Background. Meal ingestion induces a postprandial experience that involves homeostatic and hedonic sensations. Our aim was to determine the effect of aversive conditioning on the postprandial reward of a comfort meal. Methods: A sham-controlled, randomised, parallel, single-blind study was performed on 12 healthy women (6 per group). A comfort meal was tested before and after coupling the meal with an aversive sensation (conditioning intervention), induced by infusion of lipids via a thin naso-duodenal catheter; in the pre- and post-conditioning tests and in the control group, a sham infusion was performed. Participants were instructed that two recipes of a tasty humus would be tested; however, the same meal was administered with a colour additive in the conditioning and post-conditioning tests. Digestive well-being (primary outcome) was measured every 10 min before and 60 min after ingestion using graded scales. Results: In the aversive conditioning group, the comfort meal in the pre-conditioning test induced a pleasant postprandial experience, which was significantly lower in the post-conditioning test; the effect of aversive conditioning (change from pre- to post-conditioning) was significant as compared to sham conditioning in the control group, which showed no differences between study days. Conclusion: The hedonic postprandial response to a comfort meal in healthy women is impaired by aversive conditioning. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04938934.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T03:26:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7c18790cebc04d8090f697069f34bc17
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6643
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T03:26:30Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Nutrients
spelling doaj.art-7c18790cebc04d8090f697069f34bc172023-11-18T02:43:41ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432023-05-011510224710.3390/nu15102247Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort MealAdoracion Nieto0Dan M. Livovsky1Fernando Azpiroz2Digestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, SpainDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, SpainDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, SpainBackground. Meal ingestion induces a postprandial experience that involves homeostatic and hedonic sensations. Our aim was to determine the effect of aversive conditioning on the postprandial reward of a comfort meal. Methods: A sham-controlled, randomised, parallel, single-blind study was performed on 12 healthy women (6 per group). A comfort meal was tested before and after coupling the meal with an aversive sensation (conditioning intervention), induced by infusion of lipids via a thin naso-duodenal catheter; in the pre- and post-conditioning tests and in the control group, a sham infusion was performed. Participants were instructed that two recipes of a tasty humus would be tested; however, the same meal was administered with a colour additive in the conditioning and post-conditioning tests. Digestive well-being (primary outcome) was measured every 10 min before and 60 min after ingestion using graded scales. Results: In the aversive conditioning group, the comfort meal in the pre-conditioning test induced a pleasant postprandial experience, which was significantly lower in the post-conditioning test; the effect of aversive conditioning (change from pre- to post-conditioning) was significant as compared to sham conditioning in the control group, which showed no differences between study days. Conclusion: The hedonic postprandial response to a comfort meal in healthy women is impaired by aversive conditioning. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04938934.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/15/10/2247Pavlovian conditioningaversive conditioningeating behaviourdigestive sensationspostprandial symptomsdigestive well-being
spellingShingle Adoracion Nieto
Dan M. Livovsky
Fernando Azpiroz
Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal
Nutrients
Pavlovian conditioning
aversive conditioning
eating behaviour
digestive sensations
postprandial symptoms
digestive well-being
title Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal
title_full Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal
title_fullStr Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal
title_full_unstemmed Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal
title_short Conditioning by a Previous Experience Impairs the Rewarding Value of a Comfort Meal
title_sort conditioning by a previous experience impairs the rewarding value of a comfort meal
topic Pavlovian conditioning
aversive conditioning
eating behaviour
digestive sensations
postprandial symptoms
digestive well-being
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/15/10/2247
work_keys_str_mv AT adoracionnieto conditioningbyapreviousexperienceimpairstherewardingvalueofacomfortmeal
AT danmlivovsky conditioningbyapreviousexperienceimpairstherewardingvalueofacomfortmeal
AT fernandoazpiroz conditioningbyapreviousexperienceimpairstherewardingvalueofacomfortmeal