Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases

Abstract Background Performance status (PS) is known as one of the strongest prognostic factors for survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to analyze factors associated with poor PS assessed after resection for colorectal liver metastases and the impact o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Strandberg Holka, Sam Eriksson, Jakob Eberhard, Magnus Bergenfeldt, Gert Lindell, Christian Sturesson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-01-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-017-1306-1
_version_ 1818899341917552640
author Peter Strandberg Holka
Sam Eriksson
Jakob Eberhard
Magnus Bergenfeldt
Gert Lindell
Christian Sturesson
author_facet Peter Strandberg Holka
Sam Eriksson
Jakob Eberhard
Magnus Bergenfeldt
Gert Lindell
Christian Sturesson
author_sort Peter Strandberg Holka
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Performance status (PS) is known as one of the strongest prognostic factors for survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to analyze factors associated with poor PS assessed after resection for colorectal liver metastases and the impact on survival. Methods All patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal liver metastases between 2010 and 2015 in a single center were reviewed retrospectively. Results A total of 284 patients were included, out of whom 74 patients (26%) presented with a postoperative PS WHO > 2 precluding administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. These patients had a shorter recurrence-free survival (P = 0.002) and shorter overall survival (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that patients with PS > 2 after surgery had higher preoperative ASA score, had a higher frequency of major complications after surgery, and had more frequently synchronous liver and lung metastases. PS was found to be the strongest independent factor predicting survival (hazard ratio 0.45). When patients with postoperative PS > 2 developed recurrent disease (54 of 74), 43 (80%) received tumor specific treatment. Conclusions Patients with postoperative PS > 2 who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had decreased recurrence-free and overall survival after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. After recurrence, a large majority of these patients had had improvement in PS allowing for administration of tumor specific treatment.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T19:46:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7c19046d2156470dafd815205b998a85
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7819
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T19:46:26Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
spelling doaj.art-7c19046d2156470dafd815205b998a852022-12-21T20:08:06ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192018-01-011611610.1186/s12957-017-1306-1Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastasesPeter Strandberg Holka0Sam Eriksson1Jakob Eberhard2Magnus Bergenfeldt3Gert Lindell4Christian Sturesson5Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund UniversityDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund UniversityDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology, Skane University Hospital, Lund UniversityDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund UniversityDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund UniversityDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund UniversityAbstract Background Performance status (PS) is known as one of the strongest prognostic factors for survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to analyze factors associated with poor PS assessed after resection for colorectal liver metastases and the impact on survival. Methods All patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal liver metastases between 2010 and 2015 in a single center were reviewed retrospectively. Results A total of 284 patients were included, out of whom 74 patients (26%) presented with a postoperative PS WHO > 2 precluding administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. These patients had a shorter recurrence-free survival (P = 0.002) and shorter overall survival (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that patients with PS > 2 after surgery had higher preoperative ASA score, had a higher frequency of major complications after surgery, and had more frequently synchronous liver and lung metastases. PS was found to be the strongest independent factor predicting survival (hazard ratio 0.45). When patients with postoperative PS > 2 developed recurrent disease (54 of 74), 43 (80%) received tumor specific treatment. Conclusions Patients with postoperative PS > 2 who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had decreased recurrence-free and overall survival after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. After recurrence, a large majority of these patients had had improvement in PS allowing for administration of tumor specific treatment.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-017-1306-1Colorectal neoplasmsHepatectomy
spellingShingle Peter Strandberg Holka
Sam Eriksson
Jakob Eberhard
Magnus Bergenfeldt
Gert Lindell
Christian Sturesson
Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Colorectal neoplasms
Hepatectomy
title Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_full Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_fullStr Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_full_unstemmed Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_short Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_sort significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
topic Colorectal neoplasms
Hepatectomy
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-017-1306-1
work_keys_str_mv AT peterstrandbergholka significanceofpoorperformancestatusafterresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT sameriksson significanceofpoorperformancestatusafterresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT jakobeberhard significanceofpoorperformancestatusafterresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT magnusbergenfeldt significanceofpoorperformancestatusafterresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT gertlindell significanceofpoorperformancestatusafterresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT christiansturesson significanceofpoorperformancestatusafterresectionofcolorectallivermetastases