Arrows Can Be Dangerous

Arrow signs find use in professional fields are a part of everyday practices exercised in public places. Both the geographical and cultural settings affect a signs utility; the focus here is on arrows in England and its North American colonies and in particular English uses of the broad arrowhead as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Monk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Paderborn University: Media Systems and Media Organisation Research Group 2012-12-01
Series:tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique
Online Access:https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/337
Description
Summary:Arrow signs find use in professional fields are a part of everyday practices exercised in public places. Both the geographical and cultural settings affect a signs utility; the focus here is on arrows in England and its North American colonies and in particular English uses of the broad arrowhead as a symbol for regal property and as a mark on convict's clothes. A semiotic analysis using Jakobson's functional categories shows that practices that incorporate signs are not unde the control of the sign maker and the geographical and historical context can change a signs use and can occasionally render an acceptable sign into one that  provokes anger and bring ignominy. Such negative effects draw attention to the ethical dimension of signs.
ISSN:1726-670X
1726-670X