Concept of “Quixoticism” in Work of Miguel de Unamuno

The article is devoted to the concept of “quixoticism” by M. de Unamuno. It is determined that Unamuno’s Quixoteism was formed on the basis of the philosophy of F. M. Dostoevsky, with which M. de Unamuno has much in common: the perception of the image of Don Quixote as a reflection of the national c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: O. B. Elkan, M. V. Norets, V. A. Putra
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2023-02-01
Series:Научный диалог
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/4299
_version_ 1797245561163743232
author O. B. Elkan
M. V. Norets
V. A. Putra
author_facet O. B. Elkan
M. V. Norets
V. A. Putra
author_sort O. B. Elkan
collection DOAJ
description The article is devoted to the concept of “quixoticism” by M. de Unamuno. It is determined that Unamuno’s Quixoteism was formed on the basis of the philosophy of F. M. Dostoevsky, with which M. de Unamuno has much in common: the perception of the image of Don Quixote as a reflection of the national character. It is emphasized that the basic difference between these philosophies is the realism of the “Christ-like” image in F. M. Dostoevsky and the reality of the “quixotic” image, which goes beyond the artistic world in M. de Unamuno. It has been proven that Unamuno’s Quixoticism is essentially a religion that includes the main religious components, but Don Quixote lives on earth, while, unlike Christ, he is a man, a man with a divine beginning, a man who imitates God. The authors note that, despite the difference in approaches, both F. M. Dostoevsky and M. de Unamuno bow before the image of Don Quixote. Each of them sees in it a reflection of the national characteristics of the peoples to which the authors identify themselves (Russian and Spanish), as well as a biblical reference to Jesus Christ. It is determined that the distinguishing features of perception is the fact that the characters of F. M. Dostoevsky are striving for greater realism, while the characters of Unamuno are more real in their own way, even relative to its creator, and have a greater impact on the existence and spiritual development of “real” people than other “real” people.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:27:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7c2943c1438f4a4995c9b0ac97cb0673
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2225-756X
2227-1295
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:28:51Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
record_format Article
series Научный диалог
spelling doaj.art-7c2943c1438f4a4995c9b0ac97cb06732024-03-25T14:31:10ZrusTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovНаучный диалог2225-756X2227-12952023-02-0112128229510.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-1-282-2952387Concept of “Quixoticism” in Work of Miguel de UnamunoO. B. Elkan0M. V. Norets1V. A. Putra2Saint Petersburg Stieglitz State Academy of Art and Design named after A. L. StieglitzV. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal UniversityCrimean University of Culture, Arts and TourismThe article is devoted to the concept of “quixoticism” by M. de Unamuno. It is determined that Unamuno’s Quixoteism was formed on the basis of the philosophy of F. M. Dostoevsky, with which M. de Unamuno has much in common: the perception of the image of Don Quixote as a reflection of the national character. It is emphasized that the basic difference between these philosophies is the realism of the “Christ-like” image in F. M. Dostoevsky and the reality of the “quixotic” image, which goes beyond the artistic world in M. de Unamuno. It has been proven that Unamuno’s Quixoticism is essentially a religion that includes the main religious components, but Don Quixote lives on earth, while, unlike Christ, he is a man, a man with a divine beginning, a man who imitates God. The authors note that, despite the difference in approaches, both F. M. Dostoevsky and M. de Unamuno bow before the image of Don Quixote. Each of them sees in it a reflection of the national characteristics of the peoples to which the authors identify themselves (Russian and Spanish), as well as a biblical reference to Jesus Christ. It is determined that the distinguishing features of perception is the fact that the characters of F. M. Dostoevsky are striving for greater realism, while the characters of Unamuno are more real in their own way, even relative to its creator, and have a greater impact on the existence and spiritual development of “real” people than other “real” people.https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/4299quixoticismrumanmiguel de unamunofyodor dostoevskyphilosophyimagechristgodlikenessverareligionphilosophy of literature
spellingShingle O. B. Elkan
M. V. Norets
V. A. Putra
Concept of “Quixoticism” in Work of Miguel de Unamuno
Научный диалог
quixoticism
ruman
miguel de unamuno
fyodor dostoevsky
philosophy
image
christ
godlikeness
vera
religion
philosophy of literature
title Concept of “Quixoticism” in Work of Miguel de Unamuno
title_full Concept of “Quixoticism” in Work of Miguel de Unamuno
title_fullStr Concept of “Quixoticism” in Work of Miguel de Unamuno
title_full_unstemmed Concept of “Quixoticism” in Work of Miguel de Unamuno
title_short Concept of “Quixoticism” in Work of Miguel de Unamuno
title_sort concept of quixoticism in work of miguel de unamuno
topic quixoticism
ruman
miguel de unamuno
fyodor dostoevsky
philosophy
image
christ
godlikeness
vera
religion
philosophy of literature
url https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/4299
work_keys_str_mv AT obelkan conceptofquixoticisminworkofmigueldeunamuno
AT mvnorets conceptofquixoticisminworkofmigueldeunamuno
AT vaputra conceptofquixoticisminworkofmigueldeunamuno