B2 Thickness Parameter Response to Equinoctial Geomagnetic Storms

The thickness parameters that most empirical models use are generally defined by empirical relations related to ionogram characteristics. This is the case with the NeQuick model that uses an inflection point below the F2 layer peak to define a thickness parameter of the F2 bottomside of the electron...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yenca Migoya-Orué, Katy Alazo-Cuartas, Anton Kashcheyev, Christine Amory-Mazaudier, Sandro Radicella, Bruno Nava, Rolland Fleury, Rodolfo Ezquer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/21/7369
_version_ 1827677812569407488
author Yenca Migoya-Orué
Katy Alazo-Cuartas
Anton Kashcheyev
Christine Amory-Mazaudier
Sandro Radicella
Bruno Nava
Rolland Fleury
Rodolfo Ezquer
author_facet Yenca Migoya-Orué
Katy Alazo-Cuartas
Anton Kashcheyev
Christine Amory-Mazaudier
Sandro Radicella
Bruno Nava
Rolland Fleury
Rodolfo Ezquer
author_sort Yenca Migoya-Orué
collection DOAJ
description The thickness parameters that most empirical models use are generally defined by empirical relations related to ionogram characteristics. This is the case with the NeQuick model that uses an inflection point below the F2 layer peak to define a thickness parameter of the F2 bottomside of the electron density profile, which is named B2. This study is focused on the effects of geomagnetic storms on the thickness parameter B2. We selected three equinoctial storms, namely 17 March 2013, 2 October 2013 and 17 March 2015. To investigate the behavior of the B2 parameter before, during and after those events, we have analyzed variations of GNSS derived vertical TEC (VTEC) and maximum electron density (NmF2) obtained from manually scaled ionograms over 20 stations at middle and low latitudes of Asian, Euro-African and American longitude sectors. The results show two main kinds of responses after the onset of the geomagnetic events: a peak of B2 parameter prior to the increase in VTEC and NmF2 (in ~60% of the cases) and a fluctuation in B2 associated with a decrease in VTEC and NmF2 (~25% of the cases). The behavior observed has been related to the dominant factor acting after the CME shocks associated with positive and negative storm effects. Investigation into the time delay of the different measurements according to location showed that B2 reacts before NmF2 and VTEC after the onset of the storms in all the cases. The sensitivity shown by B2 during the studied storms might indicate that experimentally derived thickness parameter B2 could be incorporated into the empirical models such as NeQuick in order to adapt them to storm situations that represent extreme cases of ionospheric weather-like conditions.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T05:52:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7c52d6aa29d7469a910b02b80856a6d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T05:52:02Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-7c52d6aa29d7469a910b02b80856a6d42023-11-22T21:40:36ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-11-012121736910.3390/s21217369B2 Thickness Parameter Response to Equinoctial Geomagnetic StormsYenca Migoya-Orué0Katy Alazo-Cuartas1Anton Kashcheyev2Christine Amory-Mazaudier3Sandro Radicella4Bruno Nava5Rolland Fleury6Rodolfo Ezquer7The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Strada Costiera 11, I-34151 Trieste, ItalyThe Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Strada Costiera 11, I-34151 Trieste, ItalyPhysics Department, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, CanadaThe Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Strada Costiera 11, I-34151 Trieste, ItalyThe Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Strada Costiera 11, I-34151 Trieste, ItalyThe Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Strada Costiera 11, I-34151 Trieste, ItalyLAB-STICC, UMR6285, Institut Mines-Telecom, CEDEX 3, 29288 Brest, FranceLaboratorio de Ionósfera, FACET, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, S. M. de Tucumán 4000, ArgentinaThe thickness parameters that most empirical models use are generally defined by empirical relations related to ionogram characteristics. This is the case with the NeQuick model that uses an inflection point below the F2 layer peak to define a thickness parameter of the F2 bottomside of the electron density profile, which is named B2. This study is focused on the effects of geomagnetic storms on the thickness parameter B2. We selected three equinoctial storms, namely 17 March 2013, 2 October 2013 and 17 March 2015. To investigate the behavior of the B2 parameter before, during and after those events, we have analyzed variations of GNSS derived vertical TEC (VTEC) and maximum electron density (NmF2) obtained from manually scaled ionograms over 20 stations at middle and low latitudes of Asian, Euro-African and American longitude sectors. The results show two main kinds of responses after the onset of the geomagnetic events: a peak of B2 parameter prior to the increase in VTEC and NmF2 (in ~60% of the cases) and a fluctuation in B2 associated with a decrease in VTEC and NmF2 (~25% of the cases). The behavior observed has been related to the dominant factor acting after the CME shocks associated with positive and negative storm effects. Investigation into the time delay of the different measurements according to location showed that B2 reacts before NmF2 and VTEC after the onset of the storms in all the cases. The sensitivity shown by B2 during the studied storms might indicate that experimentally derived thickness parameter B2 could be incorporated into the empirical models such as NeQuick in order to adapt them to storm situations that represent extreme cases of ionospheric weather-like conditions.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/21/7369ionospheric empirical modelsthickness parameterNeQuick modeltotal electron contentgeomagnetic storms
spellingShingle Yenca Migoya-Orué
Katy Alazo-Cuartas
Anton Kashcheyev
Christine Amory-Mazaudier
Sandro Radicella
Bruno Nava
Rolland Fleury
Rodolfo Ezquer
B2 Thickness Parameter Response to Equinoctial Geomagnetic Storms
Sensors
ionospheric empirical models
thickness parameter
NeQuick model
total electron content
geomagnetic storms
title B2 Thickness Parameter Response to Equinoctial Geomagnetic Storms
title_full B2 Thickness Parameter Response to Equinoctial Geomagnetic Storms
title_fullStr B2 Thickness Parameter Response to Equinoctial Geomagnetic Storms
title_full_unstemmed B2 Thickness Parameter Response to Equinoctial Geomagnetic Storms
title_short B2 Thickness Parameter Response to Equinoctial Geomagnetic Storms
title_sort b2 thickness parameter response to equinoctial geomagnetic storms
topic ionospheric empirical models
thickness parameter
NeQuick model
total electron content
geomagnetic storms
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/21/7369
work_keys_str_mv AT yencamigoyaorue b2thicknessparameterresponsetoequinoctialgeomagneticstorms
AT katyalazocuartas b2thicknessparameterresponsetoequinoctialgeomagneticstorms
AT antonkashcheyev b2thicknessparameterresponsetoequinoctialgeomagneticstorms
AT christineamorymazaudier b2thicknessparameterresponsetoequinoctialgeomagneticstorms
AT sandroradicella b2thicknessparameterresponsetoequinoctialgeomagneticstorms
AT brunonava b2thicknessparameterresponsetoequinoctialgeomagneticstorms
AT rollandfleury b2thicknessparameterresponsetoequinoctialgeomagneticstorms
AT rodolfoezquer b2thicknessparameterresponsetoequinoctialgeomagneticstorms