Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium study–wave 3
Abstract Objectives The COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study aims to assess the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the adult population in multiple countries. This paper describes the third wave of the UK survey (the ‘parent’ strand of the Consortium) during July‐August 2020. Me...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1880 |
| _version_ | 1818206572905496576 |
|---|---|
| author | Orla McBride Sarah Butter Jamie Murphy Mark Shevlin Todd K. Hartman Philip Hyland Ryan McKay Kate M. Bennett Jilly Gibson‐Miller Liat Levita Liam Mason Anton P. Martinez Thomas VA Stocks Frédérique Vallières Thanos Karatzias Carmen Valiente Carmelo Vazquez Richard P. Bentall |
| author_facet | Orla McBride Sarah Butter Jamie Murphy Mark Shevlin Todd K. Hartman Philip Hyland Ryan McKay Kate M. Bennett Jilly Gibson‐Miller Liat Levita Liam Mason Anton P. Martinez Thomas VA Stocks Frédérique Vallières Thanos Karatzias Carmen Valiente Carmelo Vazquez Richard P. Bentall |
| author_sort | Orla McBride |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Objectives The COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study aims to assess the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the adult population in multiple countries. This paper describes the third wave of the UK survey (the ‘parent’ strand of the Consortium) during July‐August 2020. Methods Adults (N = 2025) who participated in the baseline and/or first follow‐up surveys were reinvited to participate in this survey, which assessed: (1) COVID‐19 related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours; (2) the occurrence of common mental disorders; as well as the role of (3) psychological factors and (4) social and political attitudes, in influencing the public’s response to the pandemic. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure that the cross‐sectional sample is nationally representative in terms of gender, age, and household income, and representative of the baseline sample characteristics for household composition, ethnicity, urbanicity and born/raised in UK. Results 1166 adults (57.6% of baseline participants) provided full interviews at Wave 3. The raking procedure successfully re‐balanced the cross‐sectional sample to within 1% of population estimates across selected socio‐demographic characteristics. Conclusion This paper demonstrates the strength of the C19PRC Study data to facilitate and stimulate interdisciplinary research addressing important public health questions relating to the COVID‐19 pandemic. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T04:15:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7c70c03c3eab4f529b3ba701b9e829e0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1049-8931 1557-0657 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T04:15:10Z |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-7c70c03c3eab4f529b3ba701b9e829e02022-12-22T00:38:29ZengWileyInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research1049-89311557-06572021-09-01303n/an/a10.1002/mpr.1880Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium study–wave 3Orla McBride0Sarah Butter1Jamie Murphy2Mark Shevlin3Todd K. Hartman4Philip Hyland5Ryan McKay6Kate M. Bennett7Jilly Gibson‐Miller8Liat Levita9Liam Mason10Anton P. Martinez11Thomas VA Stocks12Frédérique Vallières13Thanos Karatzias14Carmen Valiente15Carmelo Vazquez16Richard P. Bentall17Ulster University Coleraine Northern IrelandUniversity of Sheffield Sheffield EnglandUlster University Coleraine Northern IrelandUlster University Coleraine Northern IrelandUniversity of Sheffield Sheffield EnglandMaynooth University Maynooth Republic of IrelandRoyal Holloway University of London London EnglandUniversity of Liverpool Liverpool EnglandUniversity of Sheffield Sheffield EnglandUniversity of Sheffield Sheffield EnglandUniversity College London London EnglandUniversity of Sheffield Sheffield EnglandUniversity of Sheffield Sheffield EnglandTrinity College Dublin Dublin Republic of IrelandNapier University Edinburgh ScotlandComplutense University of Madrid Madrid SpainComplutense University of Madrid Madrid SpainUniversity of Sheffield Sheffield EnglandAbstract Objectives The COVID‐19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study aims to assess the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the adult population in multiple countries. This paper describes the third wave of the UK survey (the ‘parent’ strand of the Consortium) during July‐August 2020. Methods Adults (N = 2025) who participated in the baseline and/or first follow‐up surveys were reinvited to participate in this survey, which assessed: (1) COVID‐19 related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours; (2) the occurrence of common mental disorders; as well as the role of (3) psychological factors and (4) social and political attitudes, in influencing the public’s response to the pandemic. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure that the cross‐sectional sample is nationally representative in terms of gender, age, and household income, and representative of the baseline sample characteristics for household composition, ethnicity, urbanicity and born/raised in UK. Results 1166 adults (57.6% of baseline participants) provided full interviews at Wave 3. The raking procedure successfully re‐balanced the cross‐sectional sample to within 1% of population estimates across selected socio‐demographic characteristics. Conclusion This paper demonstrates the strength of the C19PRC Study data to facilitate and stimulate interdisciplinary research addressing important public health questions relating to the COVID‐19 pandemic.https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1880COVID‐19general populationlongitudinalpsychologicalsurvey methodology |
| spellingShingle | Orla McBride Sarah Butter Jamie Murphy Mark Shevlin Todd K. Hartman Philip Hyland Ryan McKay Kate M. Bennett Jilly Gibson‐Miller Liat Levita Liam Mason Anton P. Martinez Thomas VA Stocks Frédérique Vallières Thanos Karatzias Carmen Valiente Carmelo Vazquez Richard P. Bentall Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium study–wave 3 International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research COVID‐19 general population longitudinal psychological survey methodology |
| title | Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium study–wave 3 |
| title_full | Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium study–wave 3 |
| title_fullStr | Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium study–wave 3 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium study–wave 3 |
| title_short | Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium study–wave 3 |
| title_sort | context design and conduct of the longitudinal covid 19 psychological research consortium study wave 3 |
| topic | COVID‐19 general population longitudinal psychological survey methodology |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1880 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT orlamcbride contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT sarahbutter contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT jamiemurphy contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT markshevlin contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT toddkhartman contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT philiphyland contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT ryanmckay contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT katembennett contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT jillygibsonmiller contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT liatlevita contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT liammason contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT antonpmartinez contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT thomasvastocks contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT frederiquevallieres contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT thanoskaratzias contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT carmenvaliente contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT carmelovazquez contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 AT richardpbentall contextdesignandconductofthelongitudinalcovid19psychologicalresearchconsortiumstudywave3 |