Introduction
This special issue presents reflections of international scholars on selected core issues of qualitative inquiry. They were produced in the context of an initiative to promote qualitative research in Switzerland, notably to build a network among qualitative researchers, to reflect on possibilities f...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
FQS
2005-05-01
|
Series: | Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/453 |
_version_ | 1819203548744777728 |
---|---|
author | Thomas S. Eberle Manfred Max Bergman |
author_facet | Thomas S. Eberle Manfred Max Bergman |
author_sort | Thomas S. Eberle |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This special issue presents reflections of international scholars on selected core issues of qualitative inquiry. They were produced in the context of an initiative to promote qualitative research in Switzerland, notably to build a network among qualitative researchers, to reflect on possibilities for a consensus on quality standards and teaching requirements, and to explore the viability of an archive and resource center for qualitative research.
In the first part on the why and how of qualitative methods the reasons and objectives of the initiative are delineated, and the process of resurgence, legitimation, and institutionalization of qualitative methods is described. Then three major conceptual breaks in the field of qualitative inquiry are identified, and quality concerns in qualitative methods are discussed.
In the second part on the why and how of archiving qualitative data, the situation in different European countries is presented. While France is just starting to collect qualitative data for archiving, the QualiData archive in Great Britain has already existed for more than a decade. In Germany, the Bremen Life Course Archive has the longest experience with systematic archiving of qualitative data. Crossing national borders, the Internet brings new challenges and potentials of providing resources and services on-line. It is also argued that the qualitative-quantitative divide is not very helpful, neglecting the complementarity and proximity of the two groups of methods in research, education, and archiving. It also prevents integrated data analysis and integrated styles of research, creating different archives and different types of software. Finally, crucial experiences of the QualiData archive in the area of user support are described and future measures discussed which should be taken.
URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502303 |
first_indexed | 2024-12-23T04:21:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7c8573ed89f745c18331c13c53e3a60d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1438-5627 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-12-23T04:21:40Z |
publishDate | 2005-05-01 |
publisher | FQS |
record_format | Article |
series | Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
spelling | doaj.art-7c8573ed89f745c18331c13c53e3a60d2022-12-21T18:00:15ZdeuFQSForum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272005-05-0162441IntroductionThomas S. Eberle0Manfred Max Bergman1Universität St. GallenUniversity of BaselThis special issue presents reflections of international scholars on selected core issues of qualitative inquiry. They were produced in the context of an initiative to promote qualitative research in Switzerland, notably to build a network among qualitative researchers, to reflect on possibilities for a consensus on quality standards and teaching requirements, and to explore the viability of an archive and resource center for qualitative research. In the first part on the why and how of qualitative methods the reasons and objectives of the initiative are delineated, and the process of resurgence, legitimation, and institutionalization of qualitative methods is described. Then three major conceptual breaks in the field of qualitative inquiry are identified, and quality concerns in qualitative methods are discussed. In the second part on the why and how of archiving qualitative data, the situation in different European countries is presented. While France is just starting to collect qualitative data for archiving, the QualiData archive in Great Britain has already existed for more than a decade. In Germany, the Bremen Life Course Archive has the longest experience with systematic archiving of qualitative data. Crossing national borders, the Internet brings new challenges and potentials of providing resources and services on-line. It is also argued that the qualitative-quantitative divide is not very helpful, neglecting the complementarity and proximity of the two groups of methods in research, education, and archiving. It also prevents integrated data analysis and integrated styles of research, creating different archives and different types of software. Finally, crucial experiences of the QualiData archive in the area of user support are described and future measures discussed which should be taken. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502303http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/453qualitative inquirypromoting qualitative researchinstitutionalizationlegitimationconceptual breaksquality in qualitative methodsarchiving dataon-line servicesqualitative-quantitative divideintegrated data analysisuser support |
spellingShingle | Thomas S. Eberle Manfred Max Bergman Introduction Forum: Qualitative Social Research qualitative inquiry promoting qualitative research institutionalization legitimation conceptual breaks quality in qualitative methods archiving data on-line services qualitative-quantitative divide integrated data analysis user support |
title | Introduction |
title_full | Introduction |
title_fullStr | Introduction |
title_full_unstemmed | Introduction |
title_short | Introduction |
title_sort | introduction |
topic | qualitative inquiry promoting qualitative research institutionalization legitimation conceptual breaks quality in qualitative methods archiving data on-line services qualitative-quantitative divide integrated data analysis user support |
url | http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasseberle introduction AT manfredmaxbergman introduction |