Comparison of Measurement Methods for the Frequency Range 2–150 kHz (Supraharmonics) Based on the Present Standards Framework
Advances in power electronics, increasing share of renewables in the energy system and e-mobility cause an increase of disturbances in the frequency range 2-150 kHz, also known as supraharmonics. A rigorous, credible and agreed measurement framework is essential to evaluate electromagnetic compatibi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IEEE
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | IEEE Access |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9067844/ |
| _version_ | 1828977315862806528 |
|---|---|
| author | Victor Khokhlov Jan Meyer Anne Grevener Tatiano Busatto Sarah Ronnberg |
| author_facet | Victor Khokhlov Jan Meyer Anne Grevener Tatiano Busatto Sarah Ronnberg |
| author_sort | Victor Khokhlov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Advances in power electronics, increasing share of renewables in the energy system and e-mobility cause an increase of disturbances in the frequency range 2-150 kHz, also known as supraharmonics. A rigorous, credible and agreed measurement framework is essential to evaluate electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) in this frequency range. While a normative method exists for measuring equipment emission in the laboratory, no normative method exists yet for the measurement of supraharmonic disturbance levels in the grid. The aim of this research is a detailed comparison of potential measurement methods derived from existing standards IEC 61000-4-7, IEC 61000-4-30, CISPR 16-1-1 and a critical assessment of their suitability for disturbance measurements in grid applications. Based on a comprehensive set of synthetic signals and real measurements from laboratory and field, this article studies the ability of the methods to assess the typical characteristics of supraharmonic emission with relevance to EMC coordination. It presents the benefits and drawbacks of the existing measurement methods and discusses the suitability of possible modifications for grid compliance assessment. The results and recommendations intend to be an input for the present activities of IEC SC 77A WG 9 to define a normative method for the measurement of supraharmonic disturbance levels to be included in the next edition of IEC 61000-4-30. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T14:55:13Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7c98dc10b3cc4e8581781641207544fa |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2169-3536 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T14:55:13Z |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | IEEE |
| record_format | Article |
| series | IEEE Access |
| spelling | doaj.art-7c98dc10b3cc4e8581781641207544fa2022-12-21T22:57:00ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362020-01-018776187763010.1109/ACCESS.2020.29879969067844Comparison of Measurement Methods for the Frequency Range 2–150 kHz (Supraharmonics) Based on the Present Standards FrameworkVictor Khokhlov0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1882-3155Jan Meyer1Anne Grevener2Tatiano Busatto3Sarah Ronnberg4Institute of Electrical Power Systems and High Voltage Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyInstitute of Electrical Power Systems and High Voltage Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyInstitute of Electrical Power Systems and High Voltage Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyDepartment of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology, Skellefteå, SwedenDepartment of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology, Skellefteå, SwedenAdvances in power electronics, increasing share of renewables in the energy system and e-mobility cause an increase of disturbances in the frequency range 2-150 kHz, also known as supraharmonics. A rigorous, credible and agreed measurement framework is essential to evaluate electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) in this frequency range. While a normative method exists for measuring equipment emission in the laboratory, no normative method exists yet for the measurement of supraharmonic disturbance levels in the grid. The aim of this research is a detailed comparison of potential measurement methods derived from existing standards IEC 61000-4-7, IEC 61000-4-30, CISPR 16-1-1 and a critical assessment of their suitability for disturbance measurements in grid applications. Based on a comprehensive set of synthetic signals and real measurements from laboratory and field, this article studies the ability of the methods to assess the typical characteristics of supraharmonic emission with relevance to EMC coordination. It presents the benefits and drawbacks of the existing measurement methods and discusses the suitability of possible modifications for grid compliance assessment. The results and recommendations intend to be an input for the present activities of IEC SC 77A WG 9 to define a normative method for the measurement of supraharmonic disturbance levels to be included in the next edition of IEC 61000-4-30.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9067844/Distortion measurementelectromagnetic compatibilitymeasurement standardspower qualitysupraharmonicsfrequency domain analysis |
| spellingShingle | Victor Khokhlov Jan Meyer Anne Grevener Tatiano Busatto Sarah Ronnberg Comparison of Measurement Methods for the Frequency Range 2–150 kHz (Supraharmonics) Based on the Present Standards Framework IEEE Access Distortion measurement electromagnetic compatibility measurement standards power quality supraharmonics frequency domain analysis |
| title | Comparison of Measurement Methods for the Frequency Range 2–150 kHz (Supraharmonics) Based on the Present Standards Framework |
| title_full | Comparison of Measurement Methods for the Frequency Range 2–150 kHz (Supraharmonics) Based on the Present Standards Framework |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Measurement Methods for the Frequency Range 2–150 kHz (Supraharmonics) Based on the Present Standards Framework |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Measurement Methods for the Frequency Range 2–150 kHz (Supraharmonics) Based on the Present Standards Framework |
| title_short | Comparison of Measurement Methods for the Frequency Range 2–150 kHz (Supraharmonics) Based on the Present Standards Framework |
| title_sort | comparison of measurement methods for the frequency range 2 x2013 150 khz supraharmonics based on the present standards framework |
| topic | Distortion measurement electromagnetic compatibility measurement standards power quality supraharmonics frequency domain analysis |
| url | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9067844/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT victorkhokhlov comparisonofmeasurementmethodsforthefrequencyrange2x2013150khzsupraharmonicsbasedonthepresentstandardsframework AT janmeyer comparisonofmeasurementmethodsforthefrequencyrange2x2013150khzsupraharmonicsbasedonthepresentstandardsframework AT annegrevener comparisonofmeasurementmethodsforthefrequencyrange2x2013150khzsupraharmonicsbasedonthepresentstandardsframework AT tatianobusatto comparisonofmeasurementmethodsforthefrequencyrange2x2013150khzsupraharmonicsbasedonthepresentstandardsframework AT sarahronnberg comparisonofmeasurementmethodsforthefrequencyrange2x2013150khzsupraharmonicsbasedonthepresentstandardsframework |