Cross-jurisdictional data access processes and coordination in two countries: key learnings and innovative approaches.

Objectives Access to cross-jurisdictional data can be beneficial to researchers but challenges exist in accessing data from different legal jurisdictions and policy environments. Two national networks in Australia and Canada will share their respective approaches to supporting the discovery of, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marie-Chantal Ethier, Juliana Wu, Carina Marshall, Felicity Flack
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Swansea University 2022-08-01
Series:International Journal of Population Data Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijpds.org/article/view/2033
_version_ 1797428810878025728
author Marie-Chantal Ethier
Juliana Wu
Carina Marshall
Felicity Flack
author_facet Marie-Chantal Ethier
Juliana Wu
Carina Marshall
Felicity Flack
author_sort Marie-Chantal Ethier
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Access to cross-jurisdictional data can be beneficial to researchers but challenges exist in accessing data from different legal jurisdictions and policy environments. Two national networks in Australia and Canada will share their respective approaches to supporting the discovery of, and coordinating applications and approvals for, cross-jurisdictional data access. Approach Collaboration between these two networks in the last year have allowed members to gain a better understanding of the approaches that have been put in place to support the coordination of cross-jurisdictional data applications. Through regular inter-network discussion and joint workshops, we have gained insight into the similarities, differences and challenges faced by each and identified common goals for continued shared learnings. Results Similarities and differences exist between the approach and processes each network has implemented to coordinate applications for cross-jurisdictional data. In both countries, a single point of contact model has been key in coordinating data requests centrally. Whereas in one country, virtual access to linked data is provided centrally, different legal and policy environments across jurisdictions in another country are barriers to accessing data in one location.  Each network has developed processes and tools to meet researcher needs while respecting local requirements and are turning to innovative strategies. For example, one network is developing infrastructure to support analysis of data in a distributed way, and both groups are creating centralized tools to streamline the data discovery and access processes to improve researcher experience. Conclusion The coordination of applications for cross-jurisdictional data access by two national networks has streamlined researcher access, but challenges exist to fully meet researcher needs for cross-jurisdictional analyses.  The continued cross-network collaboration will allow for shared learning opportunities and development of innovative solutions to tackle challenges related to cross-jurisdictional data access.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T09:04:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7c9f4ad16f45444eab852c94f033bbb2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2399-4908
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T09:04:12Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Swansea University
record_format Article
series International Journal of Population Data Science
spelling doaj.art-7c9f4ad16f45444eab852c94f033bbb22023-12-02T10:46:57ZengSwansea UniversityInternational Journal of Population Data Science2399-49082022-08-017310.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2033Cross-jurisdictional data access processes and coordination in two countries: key learnings and innovative approaches.Marie-Chantal Ethier0Juliana Wu1Carina Marshall2Felicity Flack3Health Data Research Network (HDRN) Canada; Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)Health Data Research Network (HDRN) Canada; Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI)Population Health Research Network (PHRN) AustraliaPopulation Health Research Network (PHRN) Australia Objectives Access to cross-jurisdictional data can be beneficial to researchers but challenges exist in accessing data from different legal jurisdictions and policy environments. Two national networks in Australia and Canada will share their respective approaches to supporting the discovery of, and coordinating applications and approvals for, cross-jurisdictional data access. Approach Collaboration between these two networks in the last year have allowed members to gain a better understanding of the approaches that have been put in place to support the coordination of cross-jurisdictional data applications. Through regular inter-network discussion and joint workshops, we have gained insight into the similarities, differences and challenges faced by each and identified common goals for continued shared learnings. Results Similarities and differences exist between the approach and processes each network has implemented to coordinate applications for cross-jurisdictional data. In both countries, a single point of contact model has been key in coordinating data requests centrally. Whereas in one country, virtual access to linked data is provided centrally, different legal and policy environments across jurisdictions in another country are barriers to accessing data in one location.  Each network has developed processes and tools to meet researcher needs while respecting local requirements and are turning to innovative strategies. For example, one network is developing infrastructure to support analysis of data in a distributed way, and both groups are creating centralized tools to streamline the data discovery and access processes to improve researcher experience. Conclusion The coordination of applications for cross-jurisdictional data access by two national networks has streamlined researcher access, but challenges exist to fully meet researcher needs for cross-jurisdictional analyses.  The continued cross-network collaboration will allow for shared learning opportunities and development of innovative solutions to tackle challenges related to cross-jurisdictional data access. https://ijpds.org/article/view/2033cross-jurisdictional datadata requestdata access
spellingShingle Marie-Chantal Ethier
Juliana Wu
Carina Marshall
Felicity Flack
Cross-jurisdictional data access processes and coordination in two countries: key learnings and innovative approaches.
International Journal of Population Data Science
cross-jurisdictional data
data request
data access
title Cross-jurisdictional data access processes and coordination in two countries: key learnings and innovative approaches.
title_full Cross-jurisdictional data access processes and coordination in two countries: key learnings and innovative approaches.
title_fullStr Cross-jurisdictional data access processes and coordination in two countries: key learnings and innovative approaches.
title_full_unstemmed Cross-jurisdictional data access processes and coordination in two countries: key learnings and innovative approaches.
title_short Cross-jurisdictional data access processes and coordination in two countries: key learnings and innovative approaches.
title_sort cross jurisdictional data access processes and coordination in two countries key learnings and innovative approaches
topic cross-jurisdictional data
data request
data access
url https://ijpds.org/article/view/2033
work_keys_str_mv AT mariechantalethier crossjurisdictionaldataaccessprocessesandcoordinationintwocountrieskeylearningsandinnovativeapproaches
AT julianawu crossjurisdictionaldataaccessprocessesandcoordinationintwocountrieskeylearningsandinnovativeapproaches
AT carinamarshall crossjurisdictionaldataaccessprocessesandcoordinationintwocountrieskeylearningsandinnovativeapproaches
AT felicityflack crossjurisdictionaldataaccessprocessesandcoordinationintwocountrieskeylearningsandinnovativeapproaches