Cystatin and glomerular filtration rate equations in old renal transplant donors

Introduction Early detection of renal dysfunction in live kidney donors is important and needs easy reliable tools. The aim of the study is to evaluate the cystatin level and cystatin-based equation in assessment of renal function in old healthy kidney donors. Participants and methods A total of 27...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Y Ali, Sahier O Elkhashab
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-01-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.esim.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-7782;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=185;epage=190;aulast=Ali
_version_ 1818205018646380544
author Ahmed Y Ali
Sahier O Elkhashab
author_facet Ahmed Y Ali
Sahier O Elkhashab
author_sort Ahmed Y Ali
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Early detection of renal dysfunction in live kidney donors is important and needs easy reliable tools. The aim of the study is to evaluate the cystatin level and cystatin-based equation in assessment of renal function in old healthy kidney donors. Participants and methods A total of 27 living kidney donors were selected in the study, where serum creatinine and cystatin C were measured. Measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was done by DTPA renal scintigraphy, and it was estimated by the following equations: Cockroft–Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration-based creatinine, cystatin, and creatinine–cystatin formulae. Results A total of 27 kidney donors comprised 12 (44.4%) males and 15 (55.6%) females. The mean±SD age was 61±0.14 years, and mean±SD age at the time of donation was 56.9±1.7 years. The mean of cystatin level was 1.28±0.44. Serum cystatin was negatively correlated with measured filtration rate by renal scintigraphy and estimating GFR by cystatin and creatinine–cystatin formulae. The performance of Cockroft–Gault equation was better, with the highest sensitivity (70%). Serum cystatin and cystatin-based equation had higher specificity (70%) at criterion of 1.4 and 48, respectively. Area under the curve was 0.204 and 0.839, respectively, and significance level was 0.002 and 0.009, respectively. Conclusion Serum cystatin and cystatin-based formulae could outperform as surrogate tools to monitor the renal function and estimating GFR in healthy older kidney donors. Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration-based cystatin has better specificity, whereas Cockroft–Gault equation has better sensitivity with the best accuracy.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T03:50:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7cb351c87d104cd3a924bbc4c17e36dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1110-7782
2090-9098
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T03:50:28Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine
spelling doaj.art-7cb351c87d104cd3a924bbc4c17e36dc2022-12-22T00:39:24ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine1110-77822090-90982019-01-0131218519010.4103/ejim.ejim_99_18Cystatin and glomerular filtration rate equations in old renal transplant donorsAhmed Y AliSahier O ElkhashabIntroduction Early detection of renal dysfunction in live kidney donors is important and needs easy reliable tools. The aim of the study is to evaluate the cystatin level and cystatin-based equation in assessment of renal function in old healthy kidney donors. Participants and methods A total of 27 living kidney donors were selected in the study, where serum creatinine and cystatin C were measured. Measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was done by DTPA renal scintigraphy, and it was estimated by the following equations: Cockroft–Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration-based creatinine, cystatin, and creatinine–cystatin formulae. Results A total of 27 kidney donors comprised 12 (44.4%) males and 15 (55.6%) females. The mean±SD age was 61±0.14 years, and mean±SD age at the time of donation was 56.9±1.7 years. The mean of cystatin level was 1.28±0.44. Serum cystatin was negatively correlated with measured filtration rate by renal scintigraphy and estimating GFR by cystatin and creatinine–cystatin formulae. The performance of Cockroft–Gault equation was better, with the highest sensitivity (70%). Serum cystatin and cystatin-based equation had higher specificity (70%) at criterion of 1.4 and 48, respectively. Area under the curve was 0.204 and 0.839, respectively, and significance level was 0.002 and 0.009, respectively. Conclusion Serum cystatin and cystatin-based formulae could outperform as surrogate tools to monitor the renal function and estimating GFR in healthy older kidney donors. Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration-based cystatin has better specificity, whereas Cockroft–Gault equation has better sensitivity with the best accuracy.http://www.esim.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-7782;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=185;epage=190;aulast=AliChronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaborationcreatininecystatinglomerular filtration rateold kidney donors
spellingShingle Ahmed Y Ali
Sahier O Elkhashab
Cystatin and glomerular filtration rate equations in old renal transplant donors
The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine
Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration
creatinine
cystatin
glomerular filtration rate
old kidney donors
title Cystatin and glomerular filtration rate equations in old renal transplant donors
title_full Cystatin and glomerular filtration rate equations in old renal transplant donors
title_fullStr Cystatin and glomerular filtration rate equations in old renal transplant donors
title_full_unstemmed Cystatin and glomerular filtration rate equations in old renal transplant donors
title_short Cystatin and glomerular filtration rate equations in old renal transplant donors
title_sort cystatin and glomerular filtration rate equations in old renal transplant donors
topic Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration
creatinine
cystatin
glomerular filtration rate
old kidney donors
url http://www.esim.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-7782;year=2019;volume=31;issue=2;spage=185;epage=190;aulast=Ali
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedyali cystatinandglomerularfiltrationrateequationsinoldrenaltransplantdonors
AT sahieroelkhashab cystatinandglomerularfiltrationrateequationsinoldrenaltransplantdonors