Incorporating anti-infective drugs into peripherally inserted catheters does not reduce infection rates in neonates

PurposeThis study assesses whether peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC), impregnated with anti-infective drugs, reduce the rate of infections in neonates compared with unimpregnated catheters.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on electronic patient records of neonates bor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Koppitz, Rudolf Georg Ascherl, Ulrich Herbert Thome, Ferdinand Pulzer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1255492/full
_version_ 1797365515078860800
author Julia Koppitz
Julia Koppitz
Rudolf Georg Ascherl
Ulrich Herbert Thome
Ferdinand Pulzer
author_facet Julia Koppitz
Julia Koppitz
Rudolf Georg Ascherl
Ulrich Herbert Thome
Ferdinand Pulzer
author_sort Julia Koppitz
collection DOAJ
description PurposeThis study assesses whether peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC), impregnated with anti-infective drugs, reduce the rate of infections in neonates compared with unimpregnated catheters.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on electronic patient records of neonates born between August 2014 and May 2020, who had PICCs inserted, either standard (S-PICC) or with anti-infective drugs (A-PICC). Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) were diagnosed based on clinical symptoms, laboratory results, and mentioning of infection in the patient record. Data on dwell time, mechanical ventilation, insertion site, maximum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, and anti-infective drug use were analyzed.ResultsA total of 223 PICCs were included. The infection rates were A-PICC (18.9%) and S-PICC (12.5%), which were not significantly different (p = 0.257). A-PICCs had significantly longer dwell times than S-PICCs (median 372 vs. 219 h, p = 0.004). The time to infection was not different between the groups (p = 0.3). There were also no significant differences in maximum CRP, insertion site abnormalities, or anti-infective drug use between the groups.ConclusionThis retrospective study did not find a significant reduction in infection rates by using PICCs containing anti-infective drugs in neonates. Current antibiotic impregnations do not seem to be effective in preventing blood stream infections.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T16:51:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7cb463830b2047d59dc775a2f53178f5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2360
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T16:51:06Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-7cb463830b2047d59dc775a2f53178f52024-01-05T04:37:46ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602024-01-011110.3389/fped.2023.12554921255492Incorporating anti-infective drugs into peripherally inserted catheters does not reduce infection rates in neonatesJulia Koppitz0Julia Koppitz1Rudolf Georg Ascherl2Ulrich Herbert Thome3Ferdinand Pulzer4Neonatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyKinder- und Jugendklinik, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, GermanyNeonatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyNeonatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyNeonatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyPurposeThis study assesses whether peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC), impregnated with anti-infective drugs, reduce the rate of infections in neonates compared with unimpregnated catheters.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on electronic patient records of neonates born between August 2014 and May 2020, who had PICCs inserted, either standard (S-PICC) or with anti-infective drugs (A-PICC). Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) were diagnosed based on clinical symptoms, laboratory results, and mentioning of infection in the patient record. Data on dwell time, mechanical ventilation, insertion site, maximum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, and anti-infective drug use were analyzed.ResultsA total of 223 PICCs were included. The infection rates were A-PICC (18.9%) and S-PICC (12.5%), which were not significantly different (p = 0.257). A-PICCs had significantly longer dwell times than S-PICCs (median 372 vs. 219 h, p = 0.004). The time to infection was not different between the groups (p = 0.3). There were also no significant differences in maximum CRP, insertion site abnormalities, or anti-infective drug use between the groups.ConclusionThis retrospective study did not find a significant reduction in infection rates by using PICCs containing anti-infective drugs in neonates. Current antibiotic impregnations do not seem to be effective in preventing blood stream infections.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1255492/fullneonatepretermcentral linecatheter-related infectionsmedicated catheters
spellingShingle Julia Koppitz
Julia Koppitz
Rudolf Georg Ascherl
Ulrich Herbert Thome
Ferdinand Pulzer
Incorporating anti-infective drugs into peripherally inserted catheters does not reduce infection rates in neonates
Frontiers in Pediatrics
neonate
preterm
central line
catheter-related infections
medicated catheters
title Incorporating anti-infective drugs into peripherally inserted catheters does not reduce infection rates in neonates
title_full Incorporating anti-infective drugs into peripherally inserted catheters does not reduce infection rates in neonates
title_fullStr Incorporating anti-infective drugs into peripherally inserted catheters does not reduce infection rates in neonates
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating anti-infective drugs into peripherally inserted catheters does not reduce infection rates in neonates
title_short Incorporating anti-infective drugs into peripherally inserted catheters does not reduce infection rates in neonates
title_sort incorporating anti infective drugs into peripherally inserted catheters does not reduce infection rates in neonates
topic neonate
preterm
central line
catheter-related infections
medicated catheters
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2023.1255492/full
work_keys_str_mv AT juliakoppitz incorporatingantiinfectivedrugsintoperipherallyinsertedcathetersdoesnotreduceinfectionratesinneonates
AT juliakoppitz incorporatingantiinfectivedrugsintoperipherallyinsertedcathetersdoesnotreduceinfectionratesinneonates
AT rudolfgeorgascherl incorporatingantiinfectivedrugsintoperipherallyinsertedcathetersdoesnotreduceinfectionratesinneonates
AT ulrichherbertthome incorporatingantiinfectivedrugsintoperipherallyinsertedcathetersdoesnotreduceinfectionratesinneonates
AT ferdinandpulzer incorporatingantiinfectivedrugsintoperipherallyinsertedcathetersdoesnotreduceinfectionratesinneonates