Investigating Iranians’ ethos during the famine of World War I using a qualitative fuzzy method

The Iranians’ Ethos is one of the issues that have been taken into account by researchers in recent decades. This article takes up the issue using a fuzzy method and attempts to show that ethos like many other concepts is fuzzy. For that purpose, break points and sensitive historical events were sel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. Ghasemi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Iranian Institute for Social and Cultural Studies 2022-03-01
Series:Taḥqīqāt-i Farhangī-i Īrān
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jicr.ir/article_463_cc6e6a120f6b860e1f02de997583e460.pdf
_version_ 1797937254840139776
author A. Ghasemi
author_facet A. Ghasemi
author_sort A. Ghasemi
collection DOAJ
description The Iranians’ Ethos is one of the issues that have been taken into account by researchers in recent decades. This article takes up the issue using a fuzzy method and attempts to show that ethos like many other concepts is fuzzy. For that purpose, break points and sensitive historical events were selected that had a great impact on the mood of Iranians, including the famine during the First World War. The war in the early 20th century had also adversely impacted the economic, social and cultural life of Iranians, which in this study specifically examines as the Ethos of Iranians. The results show that the people during the famine demonstrated characteristics such as individualism, collectivism, anti-authoritarianism and lawlessness, each of which too prevailed to some extent among Iranians. Collectivism emerged in the form of two indicators of generosity and social participation, individualism as consideration to material and immaterial interests, with the material having a higher membership score (0.48). On the discussion of lawlessness, various crimes emerged and overcharging had the highest score with 0.52 points of fuzzy membership. Anti-authoritarianism was also manifested in the form of indicators such as interference in the government’s affairs and accountability, in which the latter received the highest score with 0.18 member score. The final analysis of the concepts also shows that overcharging was the main Ethos during the famine of the First World War. Finally, it can be said that Ethos is like many fuzzy concepts and using this method can provide more appropriate results.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T18:41:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7ccd6c5c7079476aab4b2cd1eaf9e9f5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-1847
2476-5058
language fas
last_indexed 2024-04-10T18:41:49Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Iranian Institute for Social and Cultural Studies
record_format Article
series Taḥqīqāt-i Farhangī-i Īrān
spelling doaj.art-7ccd6c5c7079476aab4b2cd1eaf9e9f52023-02-01T12:51:09ZfasIranian Institute for Social and Cultural StudiesTaḥqīqāt-i Farhangī-i Īrān2008-18472476-50582022-03-01151699510.22035/jicr.2022.2910.3261463Investigating Iranians’ ethos during the famine of World War I using a qualitative fuzzy methodA. Ghasemi0PhD Student, Faculty of Social Science and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, IranThe Iranians’ Ethos is one of the issues that have been taken into account by researchers in recent decades. This article takes up the issue using a fuzzy method and attempts to show that ethos like many other concepts is fuzzy. For that purpose, break points and sensitive historical events were selected that had a great impact on the mood of Iranians, including the famine during the First World War. The war in the early 20th century had also adversely impacted the economic, social and cultural life of Iranians, which in this study specifically examines as the Ethos of Iranians. The results show that the people during the famine demonstrated characteristics such as individualism, collectivism, anti-authoritarianism and lawlessness, each of which too prevailed to some extent among Iranians. Collectivism emerged in the form of two indicators of generosity and social participation, individualism as consideration to material and immaterial interests, with the material having a higher membership score (0.48). On the discussion of lawlessness, various crimes emerged and overcharging had the highest score with 0.52 points of fuzzy membership. Anti-authoritarianism was also manifested in the form of indicators such as interference in the government’s affairs and accountability, in which the latter received the highest score with 0.18 member score. The final analysis of the concepts also shows that overcharging was the main Ethos during the famine of the First World War. Finally, it can be said that Ethos is like many fuzzy concepts and using this method can provide more appropriate results.http://www.jicr.ir/article_463_cc6e6a120f6b860e1f02de997583e460.pdfiranians’ ethosfamineworld war 1qualitative fuzzy method
spellingShingle A. Ghasemi
Investigating Iranians’ ethos during the famine of World War I using a qualitative fuzzy method
Taḥqīqāt-i Farhangī-i Īrān
iranians’ ethos
famine
world war 1
qualitative fuzzy method
title Investigating Iranians’ ethos during the famine of World War I using a qualitative fuzzy method
title_full Investigating Iranians’ ethos during the famine of World War I using a qualitative fuzzy method
title_fullStr Investigating Iranians’ ethos during the famine of World War I using a qualitative fuzzy method
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Iranians’ ethos during the famine of World War I using a qualitative fuzzy method
title_short Investigating Iranians’ ethos during the famine of World War I using a qualitative fuzzy method
title_sort investigating iranians ethos during the famine of world war i using a qualitative fuzzy method
topic iranians’ ethos
famine
world war 1
qualitative fuzzy method
url http://www.jicr.ir/article_463_cc6e6a120f6b860e1f02de997583e460.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT aghasemi investigatingiraniansethosduringthefamineofworldwariusingaqualitativefuzzymethod