Surgical Outcomes and Predictive Factors in Patients With Detrusor Underactivity Undergoing Bladder Outlet Obstruction Surgery

Purpose This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of bladder outlet surgery in patients with detrusor underactivity (DU) and to identify factors associated with successful outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of men diagnosed with DU in urodynamic studies who underwent bladd...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ming-Syun Chuang, Yin-Chien Ou, Yu-Sheng Cheng, Kuan-Yu Wu, Chang-Te Wang, Yuan-Chi Huang, Yao-Lin Kao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Continence Society 2024-03-01
Series:International Neurourology Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://einj.org/upload/pdf/inj-2346252-126.pdf
_version_ 1797224473387073536
author Ming-Syun Chuang
Yin-Chien Ou
Yu-Sheng Cheng
Kuan-Yu Wu
Chang-Te Wang
Yuan-Chi Huang
Yao-Lin Kao
author_facet Ming-Syun Chuang
Yin-Chien Ou
Yu-Sheng Cheng
Kuan-Yu Wu
Chang-Te Wang
Yuan-Chi Huang
Yao-Lin Kao
author_sort Ming-Syun Chuang
collection DOAJ
description Purpose This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of bladder outlet surgery in patients with detrusor underactivity (DU) and to identify factors associated with successful outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of men diagnosed with DU in urodynamic studies who underwent bladder outlet surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms between May 2018 and April 2023. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, uroflowmetry (UFM), and multichannel urodynamic studies were administered. Successful treatment outcomes were defined as either an IPSS improvement of at least 50% or the regaining of spontaneous voiding in patients urethral catheterization prior to surgery. Results The study included 93 male patients. Men diagnosed with significant or equivocal bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) experienced significant postoperative improvements in IPSS (from 20.6 to 6.0 and from 17.4 to 6.5, respectively), maximum urine flow rate (from 5.0 mL/sec to 14.4 mL/sec and from 8.8 mL/sec to 12.2 mL/sec, respectively) and voiding efficiency (from 48.8% to 86.0% and from 61.2% to 85.1%, respectively). However, in the group without obstruction, the improvements in IPSS and UFM results were not significant. The presence of detrusor overactivity (odds ratio [OR], 3.152; P=0.025) and preoperative urinary catheterization (OR, 2.756; P=0.040) were associated with favorable treatment outcomes. Conversely, an unobstructed bladder outlet was identified as a negative prognostic factor. Conclusions In men with DU accompanied by equivocal or significant BOO, surgical intervention to alleviate the obstruction may enhance the IPSS, quality of life, and UFM results. However, those with DU and an unobstructed bladder outlet face a comparatively high risk of treatment failure. Preoperative detrusor overactivity and urinary catheterization are associated with more favorable surgical outcomes. Consequently, active deobstructive surgery should be considered for patients with DU who are experiencing urinary retention.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T13:53:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7cd4400f6bc045faaf50d5ded2fe0f5f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2093-4777
2093-6931
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:53:41Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Korean Continence Society
record_format Article
series International Neurourology Journal
spelling doaj.art-7cd4400f6bc045faaf50d5ded2fe0f5f2024-04-04T00:09:27ZengKorean Continence SocietyInternational Neurourology Journal2093-47772093-69312024-03-01281596610.5213/inj.2346252.1261103Surgical Outcomes and Predictive Factors in Patients With Detrusor Underactivity Undergoing Bladder Outlet Obstruction SurgeryMing-Syun Chuang0Yin-Chien Ou1Yu-Sheng Cheng2Kuan-Yu Wu3Chang-Te Wang4Yuan-Chi Huang5Yao-Lin Kao6 Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, TaiwanPurpose This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of bladder outlet surgery in patients with detrusor underactivity (DU) and to identify factors associated with successful outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of men diagnosed with DU in urodynamic studies who underwent bladder outlet surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms between May 2018 and April 2023. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, uroflowmetry (UFM), and multichannel urodynamic studies were administered. Successful treatment outcomes were defined as either an IPSS improvement of at least 50% or the regaining of spontaneous voiding in patients urethral catheterization prior to surgery. Results The study included 93 male patients. Men diagnosed with significant or equivocal bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) experienced significant postoperative improvements in IPSS (from 20.6 to 6.0 and from 17.4 to 6.5, respectively), maximum urine flow rate (from 5.0 mL/sec to 14.4 mL/sec and from 8.8 mL/sec to 12.2 mL/sec, respectively) and voiding efficiency (from 48.8% to 86.0% and from 61.2% to 85.1%, respectively). However, in the group without obstruction, the improvements in IPSS and UFM results were not significant. The presence of detrusor overactivity (odds ratio [OR], 3.152; P=0.025) and preoperative urinary catheterization (OR, 2.756; P=0.040) were associated with favorable treatment outcomes. Conversely, an unobstructed bladder outlet was identified as a negative prognostic factor. Conclusions In men with DU accompanied by equivocal or significant BOO, surgical intervention to alleviate the obstruction may enhance the IPSS, quality of life, and UFM results. However, those with DU and an unobstructed bladder outlet face a comparatively high risk of treatment failure. Preoperative detrusor overactivity and urinary catheterization are associated with more favorable surgical outcomes. Consequently, active deobstructive surgery should be considered for patients with DU who are experiencing urinary retention.http://einj.org/upload/pdf/inj-2346252-126.pdfdetrusor underactivitybladder outlet obstructionurodynamicsprostateoveractive detrusor
spellingShingle Ming-Syun Chuang
Yin-Chien Ou
Yu-Sheng Cheng
Kuan-Yu Wu
Chang-Te Wang
Yuan-Chi Huang
Yao-Lin Kao
Surgical Outcomes and Predictive Factors in Patients With Detrusor Underactivity Undergoing Bladder Outlet Obstruction Surgery
International Neurourology Journal
detrusor underactivity
bladder outlet obstruction
urodynamics
prostate
overactive detrusor
title Surgical Outcomes and Predictive Factors in Patients With Detrusor Underactivity Undergoing Bladder Outlet Obstruction Surgery
title_full Surgical Outcomes and Predictive Factors in Patients With Detrusor Underactivity Undergoing Bladder Outlet Obstruction Surgery
title_fullStr Surgical Outcomes and Predictive Factors in Patients With Detrusor Underactivity Undergoing Bladder Outlet Obstruction Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Outcomes and Predictive Factors in Patients With Detrusor Underactivity Undergoing Bladder Outlet Obstruction Surgery
title_short Surgical Outcomes and Predictive Factors in Patients With Detrusor Underactivity Undergoing Bladder Outlet Obstruction Surgery
title_sort surgical outcomes and predictive factors in patients with detrusor underactivity undergoing bladder outlet obstruction surgery
topic detrusor underactivity
bladder outlet obstruction
urodynamics
prostate
overactive detrusor
url http://einj.org/upload/pdf/inj-2346252-126.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mingsyunchuang surgicaloutcomesandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithdetrusorunderactivityundergoingbladderoutletobstructionsurgery
AT yinchienou surgicaloutcomesandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithdetrusorunderactivityundergoingbladderoutletobstructionsurgery
AT yushengcheng surgicaloutcomesandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithdetrusorunderactivityundergoingbladderoutletobstructionsurgery
AT kuanyuwu surgicaloutcomesandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithdetrusorunderactivityundergoingbladderoutletobstructionsurgery
AT changtewang surgicaloutcomesandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithdetrusorunderactivityundergoingbladderoutletobstructionsurgery
AT yuanchihuang surgicaloutcomesandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithdetrusorunderactivityundergoingbladderoutletobstructionsurgery
AT yaolinkao surgicaloutcomesandpredictivefactorsinpatientswithdetrusorunderactivityundergoingbladderoutletobstructionsurgery