En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt

Abstract: A Chinese Railway to the Arctic? The Story of Belkomur – so Far The further development of the Northern Sea Route, including the associated logistical chains and infrastructure, enjoys high priority in Russia, and inadequate south–north transportation capacity is recognized as a problem. C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Arild Moe
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2021-09-01
Series:Nordisk Østforum
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tidsskriftet-nof.no/index.php/noros/article/view/3122/5704
_version_ 1818335421444128768
author Arild Moe
author_facet Arild Moe
author_sort Arild Moe
collection DOAJ
description Abstract: A Chinese Railway to the Arctic? The Story of Belkomur – so Far The further development of the Northern Sea Route, including the associated logistical chains and infrastructure, enjoys high priority in Russia, and inadequate south–north transportation capacity is recognized as a problem. China has shown increasing interest in Arctic shipping over the past ten years. The construction of a railway from the Urals, with connections to China, to a deep-water port with access to the Arctic Ocean appeared attractive, both as a strategic opportunity for China and as a natural area for Chinese engagement in Russia, given announcements of the close partnership and common interests between the two countries. Since 2012 various Chinese companies have shown interest in investing, and the conclusion of a concession agreement has been announced several times. The Russian federal authorities have voiced support, without committing budget funding. Increasingly, however, critical remarks have been heard from the federal government, although regional support remains strong. As of mid-2021 no firm agreement had been signed, and the project was put on hold. Reviewing the history of the project since Chinese companies were first engaged, this article offers insights on Russian regional authorities’ scope for manoeuvre and the relationship between central and regional power. It also reveals Russian misinterpretations of Chinese interest in the project.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T14:23:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7cd5d8bbd7ab4a1a9aa22fe97f4367a7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1891-1773
language Danish
last_indexed 2024-12-13T14:23:10Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
record_format Article
series Nordisk Østforum
spelling doaj.art-7cd5d8bbd7ab4a1a9aa22fe97f4367a72022-12-21T23:42:02ZdanCappelen Damm Akademisk NOASPNordisk Østforum1891-17732021-09-0135012614310.23865/noros.v35.3122noros.v35.3122En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langtArild MoeAbstract: A Chinese Railway to the Arctic? The Story of Belkomur – so Far The further development of the Northern Sea Route, including the associated logistical chains and infrastructure, enjoys high priority in Russia, and inadequate south–north transportation capacity is recognized as a problem. China has shown increasing interest in Arctic shipping over the past ten years. The construction of a railway from the Urals, with connections to China, to a deep-water port with access to the Arctic Ocean appeared attractive, both as a strategic opportunity for China and as a natural area for Chinese engagement in Russia, given announcements of the close partnership and common interests between the two countries. Since 2012 various Chinese companies have shown interest in investing, and the conclusion of a concession agreement has been announced several times. The Russian federal authorities have voiced support, without committing budget funding. Increasingly, however, critical remarks have been heard from the federal government, although regional support remains strong. As of mid-2021 no firm agreement had been signed, and the project was put on hold. Reviewing the history of the project since Chinese companies were first engaged, this article offers insights on Russian regional authorities’ scope for manoeuvre and the relationship between central and regional power. It also reveals Russian misinterpretations of Chinese interest in the project.https://tidsskriftet-nof.no/index.php/noros/article/view/3122/5704russiachinarailwayarcticportinfrastructure
spellingShingle Arild Moe
En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt
Nordisk Østforum
russia
china
railway
arctic
port
infrastructure
title En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt
title_full En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt
title_fullStr En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt
title_full_unstemmed En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt
title_short En kinesisk jernbane til Arktis? Historien om Belkomur – så langt
title_sort en kinesisk jernbane til arktis historien om belkomur sa langt
topic russia
china
railway
arctic
port
infrastructure
url https://tidsskriftet-nof.no/index.php/noros/article/view/3122/5704
work_keys_str_mv AT arildmoe enkinesiskjernbanetilarktishistorienombelkomursalangt