Efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implants versus the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the conservative treatment of adenomyosis

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implant (ENG-SCI) with that of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUD) for adenomyosis treatment. A prospective randomized cohort study was conducted including 108 patients (50 patients in ENG-SCI group and 58 in the L...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei Anwen, Tang Xuedong, Yang Wenjuan, Zhou Jianqing, Zhu Weili, Pan Shan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2024-03-01
Series:Open Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-0914
_version_ 1797246600510177280
author Wei Anwen
Tang Xuedong
Yang Wenjuan
Zhou Jianqing
Zhu Weili
Pan Shan
author_facet Wei Anwen
Tang Xuedong
Yang Wenjuan
Zhou Jianqing
Zhu Weili
Pan Shan
author_sort Wei Anwen
collection DOAJ
description To evaluate the clinical efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implant (ENG-SCI) with that of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUD) for adenomyosis treatment. A prospective randomized cohort study was conducted including 108 patients (50 patients in ENG-SCI group and 58 in the LNG-IUD group) with adenomyosis from January 2019 to July 2021. After 3 months of treatment, both ENG-SCI group and LNG-IUD group showed significant improvement in patients’ visual analog scale, pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC), and uterine volume (P < 0.05). The uterine volume of patients in LNG-IUD group decreased more significantly than that in the ENG-SCI group since 3 months of treatment. The PBAC score in the LNG-IUD group improved better than that in the ENG-SCI group since 6 months of treatment (P < 0.05). No significant difference in the occurrence rate of ideal vaginal bleeding patterns and the hemoglobin levels between the two groups was observed. The ENG-SCI group had a higher probability of weight gain and progesterone-related side effects (P < 0.05). Both ENG-SCI and LNG-IUD were effective in treatment of adenomyosis. However, LNG-IUD had a more significant effect in treating adenomyosis-related dysmenorrhea, excessive menstrual flow, anemia, and uterine enlargement, with relatively fewer side effects.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T19:45:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7cd64099aa5c4d579fb76c9a0d45ce1d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2391-5463
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:45:23Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Open Medicine
spelling doaj.art-7cd64099aa5c4d579fb76c9a0d45ce1d2024-03-25T07:29:05ZengDe GruyterOpen Medicine2391-54632024-03-0119141729.e110.1515/med-2024-0914Efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implants versus the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the conservative treatment of adenomyosisWei Anwen0Tang Xuedong1Yang Wenjuan2Zhou Jianqing3Zhu Weili4Pan Shan5Department of Gynecology, Jiaxing Women and Children’s Hospital Wenzhou Medical University, Jiaxing314051, ChinaDepartment of Gynecology, Jiaxing Women and Children’s Hospital Wenzhou Medical University, Jiaxing314051, ChinaDepartment of Gynecology, Jiaxing Women and Children’s Hospital Wenzhou Medical University, Jiaxing314051, ChinaDepartment of Gynecology, Jiaxing Women and Children’s Hospital Wenzhou Medical University, Jiaxing314051, ChinaDepartment of Gynecology, Jiaxing Women and Children’s Hospital Wenzhou Medical University, Jiaxing314051, ChinaDepartment of Gynecology, Jiaxing Women and Children’s Hospital Wenzhou Medical University, Jiaxing314051, ChinaTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implant (ENG-SCI) with that of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUD) for adenomyosis treatment. A prospective randomized cohort study was conducted including 108 patients (50 patients in ENG-SCI group and 58 in the LNG-IUD group) with adenomyosis from January 2019 to July 2021. After 3 months of treatment, both ENG-SCI group and LNG-IUD group showed significant improvement in patients’ visual analog scale, pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC), and uterine volume (P < 0.05). The uterine volume of patients in LNG-IUD group decreased more significantly than that in the ENG-SCI group since 3 months of treatment. The PBAC score in the LNG-IUD group improved better than that in the ENG-SCI group since 6 months of treatment (P < 0.05). No significant difference in the occurrence rate of ideal vaginal bleeding patterns and the hemoglobin levels between the two groups was observed. The ENG-SCI group had a higher probability of weight gain and progesterone-related side effects (P < 0.05). Both ENG-SCI and LNG-IUD were effective in treatment of adenomyosis. However, LNG-IUD had a more significant effect in treating adenomyosis-related dysmenorrhea, excessive menstrual flow, anemia, and uterine enlargement, with relatively fewer side effects.https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-0914adenomyosisetonogestrelimplantlevonorgestreldysmenorrheamenorrhagia
spellingShingle Wei Anwen
Tang Xuedong
Yang Wenjuan
Zhou Jianqing
Zhu Weili
Pan Shan
Efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implants versus the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the conservative treatment of adenomyosis
Open Medicine
adenomyosis
etonogestrel
implant
levonorgestrel
dysmenorrhea
menorrhagia
title Efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implants versus the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the conservative treatment of adenomyosis
title_full Efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implants versus the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the conservative treatment of adenomyosis
title_fullStr Efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implants versus the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the conservative treatment of adenomyosis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implants versus the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the conservative treatment of adenomyosis
title_short Efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implants versus the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the conservative treatment of adenomyosis
title_sort efficacy of etonogestrel subcutaneous implants versus the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system in the conservative treatment of adenomyosis
topic adenomyosis
etonogestrel
implant
levonorgestrel
dysmenorrhea
menorrhagia
url https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-0914
work_keys_str_mv AT weianwen efficacyofetonogestrelsubcutaneousimplantsversusthelevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemintheconservativetreatmentofadenomyosis
AT tangxuedong efficacyofetonogestrelsubcutaneousimplantsversusthelevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemintheconservativetreatmentofadenomyosis
AT yangwenjuan efficacyofetonogestrelsubcutaneousimplantsversusthelevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemintheconservativetreatmentofadenomyosis
AT zhoujianqing efficacyofetonogestrelsubcutaneousimplantsversusthelevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemintheconservativetreatmentofadenomyosis
AT zhuweili efficacyofetonogestrelsubcutaneousimplantsversusthelevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemintheconservativetreatmentofadenomyosis
AT panshan efficacyofetonogestrelsubcutaneousimplantsversusthelevonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemintheconservativetreatmentofadenomyosis