Contrasting Plasmodium infection rates and insecticide susceptibility profiles between the sympatric sibling species Anopheles parensis and Anopheles funestus s.s: a potential challenge for malaria vector control in Uganda

Abstract Background Although the An. funestus group conceals one of the major malaria vectors in Africa, little is known about the dynamics of members of this group across the continent. Here, we investigated the species composition, infection rate and susceptibility to insecticides of this species...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charles Mulamba, Helen Irving, Jacob M Riveron, Louis G Mukwaya, Josephine Birungi, Charles S Wondji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2014-02-01
Series:Parasites & Vectors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-71
_version_ 1827933563927920640
author Charles Mulamba
Helen Irving
Jacob M Riveron
Louis G Mukwaya
Josephine Birungi
Charles S Wondji
author_facet Charles Mulamba
Helen Irving
Jacob M Riveron
Louis G Mukwaya
Josephine Birungi
Charles S Wondji
author_sort Charles Mulamba
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Although the An. funestus group conceals one of the major malaria vectors in Africa, little is known about the dynamics of members of this group across the continent. Here, we investigated the species composition, infection rate and susceptibility to insecticides of this species group in Uganda. Methods Indoor resting blood-fed Anopheles adult female mosquitoes were collected from 3 districts in Uganda. Mosquitoes morphologically belonging to the An. funestus group were identified to species by PCR. The sporozoite infection rates were determined by TaqMan and a nested PCR. Susceptibility to major insecticides was assessed using WHO bioassays. The potential role of four candidate resistance genes was assessed using qRT-PCR. Results An. funestus s.s. and An. parensis, were the only members of the An. funestus group identified. Both species were sympatric in Masindi (North-West), whereas only An. parensis was present in Mityana (Central) and Ntungamo (South-West). The Plasmodium falciparum infection detected in An. parensis (4.2%) by TaqMan could not be confirmed by nested PCR, whereas the 5.3% infection in An. funestus s.s. was confirmed. An. parensis was susceptible to most insecticides, however, a moderate resistance was observed against deltamethrin and DDT. In the sympatric population of Masindi, resistance was observed to pyrethroids (permethrin and deltamethrin) and DDT, but all the resistant mosquitoes belonged to An. funestus s.s. No significant over-expression was observed for the four P450 candidate genes CYP6M7, CYP9K1, CYP6P9 and CYP6AA4 between deltamethrin resistant and control An. parensis. However, when compared with the susceptible FANG An. funestus s.s strain, the CYP9K1 is significantly over-expressed in An. parensis (15-fold change; P < 0.001), suggesting it could play a role in the deltamethrin resistance. Conclusion The contrasting infection rates and insecticide susceptibility profiles of both species highlights the importance of accurate species identification for successful vector control programs.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T07:26:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7ce3825bbb954125bcb60d52e2dacd34
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-3305
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T07:26:28Z
publishDate 2014-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Parasites & Vectors
spelling doaj.art-7ce3825bbb954125bcb60d52e2dacd342023-06-04T11:20:20ZengBMCParasites & Vectors1756-33052014-02-01711910.1186/1756-3305-7-71Contrasting Plasmodium infection rates and insecticide susceptibility profiles between the sympatric sibling species Anopheles parensis and Anopheles funestus s.s: a potential challenge for malaria vector control in UgandaCharles Mulamba0Helen Irving1Jacob M Riveron2Louis G Mukwaya3Josephine Birungi4Charles S Wondji5Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineUganda Virus Research InstituteUganda Virus Research InstituteVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineAbstract Background Although the An. funestus group conceals one of the major malaria vectors in Africa, little is known about the dynamics of members of this group across the continent. Here, we investigated the species composition, infection rate and susceptibility to insecticides of this species group in Uganda. Methods Indoor resting blood-fed Anopheles adult female mosquitoes were collected from 3 districts in Uganda. Mosquitoes morphologically belonging to the An. funestus group were identified to species by PCR. The sporozoite infection rates were determined by TaqMan and a nested PCR. Susceptibility to major insecticides was assessed using WHO bioassays. The potential role of four candidate resistance genes was assessed using qRT-PCR. Results An. funestus s.s. and An. parensis, were the only members of the An. funestus group identified. Both species were sympatric in Masindi (North-West), whereas only An. parensis was present in Mityana (Central) and Ntungamo (South-West). The Plasmodium falciparum infection detected in An. parensis (4.2%) by TaqMan could not be confirmed by nested PCR, whereas the 5.3% infection in An. funestus s.s. was confirmed. An. parensis was susceptible to most insecticides, however, a moderate resistance was observed against deltamethrin and DDT. In the sympatric population of Masindi, resistance was observed to pyrethroids (permethrin and deltamethrin) and DDT, but all the resistant mosquitoes belonged to An. funestus s.s. No significant over-expression was observed for the four P450 candidate genes CYP6M7, CYP9K1, CYP6P9 and CYP6AA4 between deltamethrin resistant and control An. parensis. However, when compared with the susceptible FANG An. funestus s.s strain, the CYP9K1 is significantly over-expressed in An. parensis (15-fold change; P < 0.001), suggesting it could play a role in the deltamethrin resistance. Conclusion The contrasting infection rates and insecticide susceptibility profiles of both species highlights the importance of accurate species identification for successful vector control programs.https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-71An. parensisAn. funestusMalariaInsecticide resistanceVector controlUganda
spellingShingle Charles Mulamba
Helen Irving
Jacob M Riveron
Louis G Mukwaya
Josephine Birungi
Charles S Wondji
Contrasting Plasmodium infection rates and insecticide susceptibility profiles between the sympatric sibling species Anopheles parensis and Anopheles funestus s.s: a potential challenge for malaria vector control in Uganda
Parasites & Vectors
An. parensis
An. funestus
Malaria
Insecticide resistance
Vector control
Uganda
title Contrasting Plasmodium infection rates and insecticide susceptibility profiles between the sympatric sibling species Anopheles parensis and Anopheles funestus s.s: a potential challenge for malaria vector control in Uganda
title_full Contrasting Plasmodium infection rates and insecticide susceptibility profiles between the sympatric sibling species Anopheles parensis and Anopheles funestus s.s: a potential challenge for malaria vector control in Uganda
title_fullStr Contrasting Plasmodium infection rates and insecticide susceptibility profiles between the sympatric sibling species Anopheles parensis and Anopheles funestus s.s: a potential challenge for malaria vector control in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Contrasting Plasmodium infection rates and insecticide susceptibility profiles between the sympatric sibling species Anopheles parensis and Anopheles funestus s.s: a potential challenge for malaria vector control in Uganda
title_short Contrasting Plasmodium infection rates and insecticide susceptibility profiles between the sympatric sibling species Anopheles parensis and Anopheles funestus s.s: a potential challenge for malaria vector control in Uganda
title_sort contrasting plasmodium infection rates and insecticide susceptibility profiles between the sympatric sibling species anopheles parensis and anopheles funestus s s a potential challenge for malaria vector control in uganda
topic An. parensis
An. funestus
Malaria
Insecticide resistance
Vector control
Uganda
url https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-71
work_keys_str_mv AT charlesmulamba contrastingplasmodiuminfectionratesandinsecticidesusceptibilityprofilesbetweenthesympatricsiblingspeciesanophelesparensisandanophelesfunestusssapotentialchallengeformalariavectorcontrolinuganda
AT helenirving contrastingplasmodiuminfectionratesandinsecticidesusceptibilityprofilesbetweenthesympatricsiblingspeciesanophelesparensisandanophelesfunestusssapotentialchallengeformalariavectorcontrolinuganda
AT jacobmriveron contrastingplasmodiuminfectionratesandinsecticidesusceptibilityprofilesbetweenthesympatricsiblingspeciesanophelesparensisandanophelesfunestusssapotentialchallengeformalariavectorcontrolinuganda
AT louisgmukwaya contrastingplasmodiuminfectionratesandinsecticidesusceptibilityprofilesbetweenthesympatricsiblingspeciesanophelesparensisandanophelesfunestusssapotentialchallengeformalariavectorcontrolinuganda
AT josephinebirungi contrastingplasmodiuminfectionratesandinsecticidesusceptibilityprofilesbetweenthesympatricsiblingspeciesanophelesparensisandanophelesfunestusssapotentialchallengeformalariavectorcontrolinuganda
AT charlesswondji contrastingplasmodiuminfectionratesandinsecticidesusceptibilityprofilesbetweenthesympatricsiblingspeciesanophelesparensisandanophelesfunestusssapotentialchallengeformalariavectorcontrolinuganda